IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v162y2022icp28-54.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bike-sharing inventory management for market expansion

Author

Listed:
  • Fu, Chenyi
  • Ma, Shoufeng
  • Zhu, Ning
  • He, Qiao-Chu
  • Yang, Hai

Abstract

Over the past two decades, bike-sharing systems have grown significantly worldwide. Compared with that of other business sectors, the means by which revenue is obtained in the bike-sharing industry is unique. When the market in a region or city is saturated, an efficient way for a firm to increase revenue is to enter a new market. In this study, we design a revenue maximization-oriented decision tool to support the operational decisions of a new competitor firm entering into competition against a local firm. It is assumed that operational-level information from the local firm is unknown to the competitor firm. A new multi-stage max–min–max robust maximization model is proposed. It aims to optimize the dynamic bike inventory to maximize the worst-case revenue that the competitor firm may achieve. The worst-case revenue is treated as the baseline revenue for the competitor firm according to which rational decisions can be made. Specifically, we construct an uncertainty set to capture the uncertainty in the bike distribution of the local firm. To work with this nonconvex model, we design a myopic method, inspired by a special two-stage model that can be solved with a customized constraint-and-column approach, for obtaining the upper and lower bounds of the potential optimal revenue in our multistage model. The results of numerical experiments illustrate that the approximation approach has satisfactory computational efficiency and generates a tight bound of the optimal baseline revenue. Sensitivity analyses show that the new competitor firm should not increase its investment in bikes when the local firm increases its quantity of bikes because of high depreciation costs. Moreover, the two firms would allocate a similar proportion of bikes to each zone when either of them provides a large number of bikes. When the firms both provide a small number of bikes, the allocation of bikes by the new competitor firm is widely dispersed, while the local firm tends to allocate bikes across several zones with high demand. Furthermore, on the premise of a given target, increasing the bike acquisition can improve the robustness of revenue estimation for the competitor firm.

Suggested Citation

  • Fu, Chenyi & Ma, Shoufeng & Zhu, Ning & He, Qiao-Chu & Yang, Hai, 2022. "Bike-sharing inventory management for market expansion," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 28-54.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:162:y:2022:i:c:p:28-54
    DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2022.05.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261522000868
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.trb.2022.05.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhi Chen & Melvyn Sim & Peng Xiong, 2020. "Robust Stochastic Optimization Made Easy with RSOME," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(8), pages 3329-3339, August.
    2. Li, Yanfeng & Szeto, W.Y. & Long, Jiancheng & Shui, C.S., 2016. "A multiple type bike repositioning problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 263-278.
    3. Zhaowei Hao & Long He & Zhenyu Hu & Jun Jiang, 2020. "Robust Vehicle Pre‐Allocation with Uncertain Covariates," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(4), pages 955-972, April.
    4. Qiao‐Chu He & Tiantian Nie & Yun Yang & Zuo‐Jun Shen, 2021. "Beyond Repositioning: Crowd‐Sourcing and Geo‐Fencing for Shared‐Mobility Systems," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(10), pages 3448-3466, October.
    5. Legros, Benjamin, 2019. "Dynamic repositioning strategy in a bike-sharing system; how to prioritize and how to rebalance a bike station," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(2), pages 740-753.
    6. Andrea Baggio & Margarida Carvalho & Andrea Lodi & Andrea Tramontani, 2021. "Multilevel Approaches for the Critical Node Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 69(2), pages 486-508, March.
    7. Shaheen, Susan & Guzman, Stacey & Zhang, Hua, 2010. "Bikesharing in Europe, the Americas, and Asia: Past, Present, and Future," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt79v822k5, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    8. Lode Li, 2002. "Information Sharing in a Supply Chain with Horizontal Competition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(9), pages 1196-1212, September.
    9. Tolga H. Seyhan & Lawrence V. Snyder & Ying Zhang, 2018. "A New Heuristic Formulation for a Competitive Maximal Covering Location Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(5), pages 1156-1173, October.
    10. Guangyu Cao & Ginger Zhe Jin & Xi Weng & Li‐An Zhou, 2021. "Market‐expanding or Market‐stealing? Competition with network effects in bike‐sharing," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 52(4), pages 778-814, December.
    11. Kostas Bimpikis & Shayan Ehsani & Rahmi İlkılıç, 2019. "Cournot Competition in Networked Markets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 2467-2481, June.
    12. Jia Shu & Mabel C. Chou & Qizhang Liu & Chung-Piaw Teo & I-Lin Wang, 2013. "Models for Effective Deployment and Redistribution of Bicycles Within Public Bicycle-Sharing Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(6), pages 1346-1359, December.
    13. Long He & Zhenyu Hu & Meilin Zhang, 2020. "Robust Repositioning for Vehicle Sharing," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(2), pages 241-256, March.
    14. Zhang, Dong & Yu, Chuhang & Desai, Jitamitra & Lau, H.Y.K. & Srivathsan, Sandeep, 2017. "A time-space network flow approach to dynamic repositioning in bicycle sharing systems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 188-207.
    15. Klaus Uhlenbruck & Peter Rodriguez & Jonathan Doh & Lorraine Eden, 2006. "The Impact of Corruption on Entry Strategy: Evidence from Telecommunication Projects in Emerging Economies," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 402-414, June.
    16. Bruno Albert Neumann-Saavedra & Teodor Gabriel Crainic & Bernard Gendron & Dirk Christian Mattfeld & Michael Römer, 2020. "Integrating Resource Management in Service Network Design for Bike-Sharing Systems," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(5), pages 1251-1271, September.
    17. Lei, Chao & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2018. "Continuous approximation for demand balancing in solving large-scale one-commodity pickup and delivery problems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 90-109.
    18. Rahul Nair & Elise Miller-Hooks, 2011. "Fleet Management for Vehicle Sharing Operations," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(4), pages 524-540, November.
    19. Xavier Martin & Robert Salomon, 2003. "Tacitness, Learning, and International Expansion: A Study of Foreign Direct Investment in a Knowledge-Intensive Industry," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(3), pages 297-311, June.
    20. Gérard P. Cachon & Christian Terwiesch & Yi Xu, 2008. "On the Effects of Consumer Search and Firm Entry in a Multiproduct Competitive Market," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 461-473, 05-06.
    21. Ben-Tal, Aharon & Chung, Byung Do & Mandala, Supreet Reddy & Yao, Tao, 2011. "Robust optimization for emergency logistics planning: Risk mitigation in humanitarian relief supply chains," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(8), pages 1177-1189, September.
    22. C. S. Agnes Cheng & Weihang Sun & Kangtao Ye & Ning Zhang, 2020. "The Effect of Auditing on Promoting Exports: Evidence from Private Firms in Emerging Markets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(4), pages 1692-1716, April.
    23. Kou, Zhaoyu & Cai, Hua, 2019. "Understanding bike sharing travel patterns: An analysis of trip data from eight cities," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 515(C), pages 785-797.
    24. Kai-Yu Hsieh & Freek Vermeulen, 2014. "The Structure of Competition: How Competition Between One’s Rivals Influences Imitative Market Entry," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 299-319, February.
    25. David Souder & Zeki Simsek & Scott G. Johnson, 2012. "The differing effects of agent and founder CEOs on the firm's market expansion," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 23-41, January.
    26. Ilídio Barreto, 2012. "A Behavioral Theory of Market Expansion Based on the Opportunity Prospects Rule," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 1008-1023, August.
    27. Suman Basuroy & Dung Nguyen, 1998. "Multinomial Logit Market Share Models: Equilibrium Characteristics and Strategic Implications," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(10), pages 1396-1408, October.
    28. Küçükaydin, Hande & Aras, Necati & Kuban AltInel, I., 2011. "Competitive facility location problem with attractiveness adjustment of the follower: A bilevel programming model and its solution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 208(3), pages 206-220, February.
    29. Shaheen, Susan A & Guzman, Stacey & Zhang, Hua, 2010. "Bikesharing in Europe, the Americas, and Asia: Past, Present and Future," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt6qg8q6ft, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    30. Hansen, Mark, 1990. "Airline competition in a hub-dominated environment: An application of noncooperative game theory," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 27-43, February.
    31. Schuijbroek, J. & Hampshire, R.C. & van Hoeve, W.-J., 2017. "Inventory rebalancing and vehicle routing in bike sharing systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(3), pages 992-1004.
    32. Maggioni, Francesca & Cagnolari, Matteo & Bertazzi, Luca & Wallace, Stein W., 2019. "Stochastic optimization models for a bike-sharing problem with transshipment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(1), pages 272-283.
    33. Liang Guo, 2006. "Consumption Flexibility, Product Configuration, and Market Competition," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 116-130, 03-04.
    34. Xin Chen & Yuhan Zhang, 2009. "Uncertain Linear Programs: Extended Affinely Adjustable Robust Counterparts," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(6), pages 1469-1482, December.
    35. Jiang, Zhoutong & Lei, Chao & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2020. "Optimal investment and management of shared bikes in a competitive market," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 143-155.
    36. Forma, Iris A. & Raviv, Tal & Tzur, Michal, 2015. "A 3-step math heuristic for the static repositioning problem in bike-sharing systems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 230-247.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Qingxin & Fu, Chenyi & Zhu, Ning & Ma, Shoufeng & He, Qiao-Chu, 2023. "A target-based optimization model for bike-sharing systems: From the perspective of service efficiency and equity," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 235-260.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fu, Chenyi & Zhu, Ning & Ma, Shoufeng & Liu, Ronghui, 2022. "A two-stage robust approach to integrated station location and rebalancing vehicle service design in bike-sharing systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(3), pages 915-938.
    2. Carlos M. Vallez & Mario Castro & David Contreras, 2021. "Challenges and Opportunities in Dock-Based Bike-Sharing Rebalancing: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-26, February.
    3. Çelebi, Dilay & Yörüsün, Aslı & Işık, Hanife, 2018. "Bicycle sharing system design with capacity allocations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 86-98.
    4. Chen, Qingxin & Fu, Chenyi & Zhu, Ning & Ma, Shoufeng & He, Qiao-Chu, 2023. "A target-based optimization model for bike-sharing systems: From the perspective of service efficiency and equity," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 235-260.
    5. Ye Ding & Jiantong Zhang & Jiaqing Sun, 2022. "Branch-and-Price-and-Cut for the Heterogeneous Fleet and Multi-Depot Static Bike Rebalancing Problem with Split Load," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-24, August.
    6. Gilbert Laporte & Frédéric Meunier & Roberto Wolfler Calvo, 2018. "Shared mobility systems: an updated survey," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(1), pages 105-126, December.
    7. Gu, Wei & Li, Meng & Wang, Chen & Shang, Jennifer & Wei, Lirong, 2021. "Strategic sourcing selection for bike-sharing rebalancing: An evolutionary game approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    8. Mohammed Elhenawy & Hesham A. Rakha & Youssef Bichiou & Mahmoud Masoud & Sebastien Glaser & Jack Pinnow & Ahmed Stohy, 2021. "A Feasible Solution for Rebalancing Large-Scale Bike Sharing Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-19, December.
    9. Gu, Wei & Yu, Xiaoru & Zhang, Shichen & Yan, Xiangbin & Wang, Chen, 2023. "To outsource or not: Bike-share rebalancing strategies under the service quality deviation of a third party," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(2), pages 847-859.
    10. Cheng, Yao & Wang, Junwei & Wang, Yan, 2021. "A user-based bike rebalancing strategy for free-floating bike sharing systems: A bidding model," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    11. Xue Bai & Ning Ma & Kwai-Sang Chin, 2022. "Hybrid Heuristic for the Multi-Depot Static Bike Rebalancing and Collection Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(23), pages 1-28, December.
    12. Huang, Di & Chen, Xinyuan & Liu, Zhiyuan & Lyu, Cheng & Wang, Shuaian & Chen, Xuewu, 2020. "A static bike repositioning model in a hub-and-spoke network framework," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    13. Wang, Yi-Jia & Kuo, Yong-Hong & Huang, George Q. & Gu, Weihua & Hu, Yaohua, 2022. "Dynamic demand-driven bike station clustering," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    14. Zhang, Yuhan & Shao, Yichang & Bi, Hui & Aoyong, Li & Ye, Zhirui, 2023. "Bike-sharing systems rebalancing considering redistribution proportions: A user-based repositioning approach," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 610(C).
    15. Sharon Datner & Tal Raviv & Michal Tzur & Daniel Chemla, 2019. "Setting Inventory Levels in a Bike Sharing Network," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(1), pages 62-76, February.
    16. Alain Quilliot & Antoine Sarbinowski & Hélène Toussaint, 2021. "Vehicle driven approaches for non preemptive vehicle relocation with integrated quality criterion in a vehicle sharing system," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 298(1), pages 445-468, March.
    17. Du, Mingyang & Cheng, Lin & Li, Xuefeng & Tang, Fang, 2020. "Static rebalancing optimization with considering the collection of malfunctioning bikes in free-floating bike sharing system," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    18. Shang, Wen-Long & Chen, Jinyu & Bi, Huibo & Sui, Yi & Chen, Yanyan & Yu, Haitao, 2021. "Impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on user behaviors and environmental benefits of bike sharing: A big-data analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    19. Dell’Amico, Mauro & Iori, Manuel & Novellani, Stefano & Subramanian, Anand, 2018. "The Bike sharing Rebalancing Problem with Stochastic Demands," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 362-380.
    20. Osorio, Jesus & Lei, Chao & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2021. "Optimal rebalancing and on-board charging of shared electric scooters," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 197-219.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:162:y:2022:i:c:p:28-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.