IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v203y2026ics096585642500391x.html

Modeling heterogeneous individual choices for multi-person household MaaS bundles

Author

Listed:
  • Tang, Hongyu
  • Feng, Tao

Abstract

Mobility as a Service (MaaS) has been investigated broadly regarding its potential market share through individual-oriented bundles or pay-as-you-go offerings. However, its potential for individual-specific offerings within multi-person households remains underexplored. This study attempts to investigate individual heterogeneous choice behavior in household-level MaaS, where bundles are specified both for the decision-maker and for their partner. Using data from a dedicated stated choice experiment involving 402 couples, we applied a latent class and latent variable model incorporating attitudinal factors such as altruism, egoism, empowerment, and household task responsibility, and socio-demographic characteristics. Results show that prioritizing mobility services for husbands may be more effective in promoting household-level MaaS adoption. Furthermore, three distinct decision-maker profiles were identified: male-dominant individualists, female-dominant individualists, and non-individualists. The significant preference heterogeneity highlights how individuals differently weigh their own versus their partner’s utility when evaluating household-level MaaS bundles. These findings provide valuable insights for designing more inclusive and targeted MaaS products that account for behavioral diversity at the individual level.

Suggested Citation

  • Tang, Hongyu & Feng, Tao, 2026. "Modeling heterogeneous individual choices for multi-person household MaaS bundles," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:203:y:2026:i:c:s096585642500391x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2025.104758
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096585642500391X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2025.104758?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:203:y:2026:i:c:s096585642500391x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.