IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v213y2025ics0040162525000654.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Selection of a crowdfunding platform by entrepreneurs using a multi-criteria approach: an application to green energy investment projects

Author

Listed:
  • Rocha, Rocío
  • García-Ramos, Rebeca
  • Cobo, Ángel

Abstract

In the context of crowdfunding, one of the most important decisions entrepreneurs face is selecting an online crowdfunding platform (CFP) to seek financing for their projects. However, there is limited knowledge on the characteristics of CFPs, which are often characterized by qualitative factors that are difficult to measure. To fill this gap, this study presented an assessment framework for evaluating CFPs based on the Multiple Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) theory. We proposed an evaluation and selection model for the most suitable CFP for an investment project based on seven criteria that encompass its main characteristics. By applying the Fuzzy Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (fuzzy TOPSIS), we presented a practical application for a green energy investment project within the Spanish context. Focusing on equity CFPs, a final sample of six feasible platforms was evaluated. The results of this study could be of interest to entrepreneurs, investors, and academics as they provide information about the criteria for selecting the best CFP to obtain financing.

Suggested Citation

  • Rocha, Rocío & García-Ramos, Rebeca & Cobo, Ángel, 2025. "Selection of a crowdfunding platform by entrepreneurs using a multi-criteria approach: an application to green energy investment projects," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:213:y:2025:i:c:s0040162525000654
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124034
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162525000654
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124034?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:213:y:2025:i:c:s0040162525000654. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.