IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceps/v102y2025ics0038012125001661.html

Efficiency evaluation of the forest sector in China: A meta-frontier DEA approach

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Dawei
  • Yang, Feng
  • Zhang, Xiaoqi
  • Sun, Yu

Abstract

Evaluating forest resource performance supports sustainable development goals. Considering regional heterogeneity, this study develops an improved meta-frontier SBM model to assess forest performance. The improved meta-frontier SBM model effectively handles regional heterogeneity caused by differences in forest resource endowments and overcomes both the issue of infeasible targets and the problem of unreasonable technology gap ratio (TGR) values in non-radial meta-frontier approach, thus providing meaningful information (such as meta-efficiency, group efficiency, and TGR) to guide the development of effective policies to improve performance. This study's empirical results indicate that forest performance was not equalized among the provinces over the study period. Specifically, with some provinces, such as Chongqing consistently achieved the maximum group efficiency score of 1.000 and some consistently performing worse. In the two areas analyzed, non-forest rich areas demonstrated rapid technological improvement, with the TGR increasing from 0.639 in 2016 to 0.883 in 2020. Additionally, we found that the traditional TGR model underestimates the value of the technology gap in provinces compared to the proposed model. Finally, improvement strategies are proposed for inefficient provinces to enhance management efficiency and reduce regional technology gaps.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Dawei & Yang, Feng & Zhang, Xiaoqi & Sun, Yu, 2025. "Efficiency evaluation of the forest sector in China: A meta-frontier DEA approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:102:y:2025:i:c:s0038012125001661
    DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2025.102317
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012125001661
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.seps.2025.102317?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Młynarski, Wojciech & Prędki, Artur & Kaliszewski, Adam, 2021. "Efficiency and factors influencing it in forest districts in southern Poland: Application of Data Envelopment Analysis," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    2. Amirteimoori, Alireza & Allahviranloo, Tofigh & Zadmirzaei, Majid, 2025. "Exploring technical efficiency in the European forest sector: A two-stage chance-constrained data envelopment analysis," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    3. Chuang-Min Chao & Ming-Miin Yu & Nan-Hsing Hsiung & Li-Hsueh Chen, 2018. "Profitability efficiency, marketability efficiency and technology gaps in Taiwan’s banking industry: meta-frontier network data envelopment analysis," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(3), pages 233-250, January.
    4. Yu, Ming-Miin & Rakshit, Ipsita, 2023. "Assessing the dynamic efficiency and technology gap of airports under different ownerships: A union dynamic NDEA approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    5. Qunwei Wang & Ye Hang & Jin‐Li Hu & Ching‐Ren Chiu, 2018. "An alternative metafrontier framework for measuring the heterogeneity of technology," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 65(5), pages 427-445, August.
    6. Christopher O’Donnell & D. Rao & George Battese, 2008. "Metafrontier frameworks for the study of firm-level efficiencies and technology ratios," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 231-255, March.
    7. Meeusen, Wim & van den Broeck, Julien, 1977. "Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 18(2), pages 435-444, June.
    8. Chiu, Ching-Ren & Liou, Je-Liang & Wu, Pei-Ing & Fang, Chen-Ling, 2012. "Decomposition of the environmental inefficiency of the meta-frontier with undesirable output," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 1392-1399.
    9. Ester Gutiérrez & Sebastián Lozano, 2022. "Cross-country comparison of the efficiency of the European forest sector and second stage DEA approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 314(2), pages 471-496, July.
    10. Chen, Lei & Wang, Ying-Ming, 2023. "Game directional distance function in meta-frontier data envelopment analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    11. Sun, Yu & Yang, Feng & Wang, Dawei & Ang, Sheng, 2023. "Efficiency evaluation for higher education institutions in China considering unbalanced regional development: A meta-frontier Super-SBM model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    12. Orlando Gomes, 2023. "Economic Growth Theory in the Twenty-First Century," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 24(1), pages 39-67, May.
    13. Lou, Jia & Yang, Guo-liang & Song, Lijian & Liu, Kai-di, 2024. "From resources to capital: Investigating the efficiency of forest ecosystem products value realization in China," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    14. Ding, Tao & Yang, Jie & Wu, Huaqing & Liang, Liang, 2022. "Land use efficiency and technology gaps of urban agglomerations in China: An extended non-radial meta-frontier approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    15. Zha, Yong & Liang, Nannan & Wu, Maoguo & Bian, Yiwen, 2016. "Efficiency evaluation of banks in China: A dynamic two-stage slacks-based measure approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 60-72.
    16. Barnabe Walheer, 2024. "Meta-frontier: literature review and toolkit," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 1-28, June.
    17. Amirteimoori, Alireza & Cezar, Asunur & Zadmirzaei, Majid & Susaeta, Andres, 2024. "Environmental performance evaluation in the forest sector: An extended stochastic data envelopment analysis approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    18. Feng, Chao & Wang, Miao, 2018. "Analysis of energy efficiency in China's transportation sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 565-575.
    19. Md. Abul Kalam Azad & Susila Munisamy & Abdul Kadar Muhammad Masum & Paolo Saona & Peter Wanke, 2017. "Bank efficiency in Malaysia: a use of malmquist meta-frontier analysis," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 7(2), pages 287-311, August.
    20. Fei, Rilong & Lin, Boqiang, 2016. "Energy efficiency and production technology heterogeneity in China's agricultural sector: A meta-frontier approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 25-34.
    21. Shunsuke Managi, 2010. "Productivity measures and effects from subsidies and trade: an empirical analysis for Japan's forestry," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(30), pages 3871-3883.
    22. Wang, Changbo & Yan, Xilong & Chang, Yuan & Wang, Qunwei & Wang, Yafei & Malik, Arunima, 2023. "Understanding the impact of interprovincial trade on forest resources in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    23. Yu, Junqing & Zhou, Kaile & Yang, Shanlin, 2019. "Regional heterogeneity of China's energy efficiency in “new normal”: A meta-frontier Super-SBM analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    24. Torben Tiedemann & Tammo Francksen & Uwe Latacz-Lohmann, 2011. "Assessing the performance of German Bundesliga football players: a non-parametric metafrontier approach," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 19(4), pages 571-587, December.
    25. Yu, Ming-Miin & See, Kok Fong & Hsiao, Bo, 2022. "Integrating group frontier and metafrontier directional distance functions to evaluate the efficiency of production units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(1), pages 254-276.
    26. Yu, Yantuan & Huang, Jianhuan & Zhang, Ning, 2019. "Modeling the eco-efficiency of Chinese prefecture-level cities with regional heterogeneities: A comparative perspective," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 402(C), pages 1-17.
    27. Tone, Kaoru, 2001. "A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(3), pages 498-509, May.
    28. Wang, Qunwei & Su, Bin & Zhou, Peng & Chiu, Ching-Ren, 2016. "Measuring total-factor CO2 emission performance and technology gaps using a non-radial directional distance function: A modified approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 475-482.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Ning & Zhao, Yu & Wang, Na, 2022. "Is China's energy policy effective for power plants? Evidence from the 12th Five-Year Plan energy saving targets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    2. Ching-Ren Chiu & Ming-Chung Chang & Jin-Li Hu, 2022. "Energy intensity improvement and energy productivity changes: an analysis of BRICS and G7 countries," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 297-311, June.
    3. Yu, Ming-Miin & Rakshit, Ipsita, 2024. "How to establish input and output targets for airlines with heterogeneous production technologies: A nash bargaining DEA approach within the meta-frontier framework," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    4. Mergoni, Anna & Emrouznejad, Ali & De Witte, Kristof, 2025. "Fifty years of Data Envelopment Analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 326(3), pages 389-412.
    5. Chen, Lei & Luo, Cuiyun & Liao, Li-Huan & Wang, Suhui, 2024. "Classified evaluation of R&D activities in Chinese universities: An application of new meta-frontier directional distance function framework," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    6. Yu, Ming-Miin & See, Kok Fong & Hsiao, Bo, 2022. "Integrating group frontier and metafrontier directional distance functions to evaluate the efficiency of production units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(1), pages 254-276.
    7. Bin Zhang & Minmin Ma & Yung-ho Chiu, 2024. "Considering the impact of geographic location and climate on China’s environmental efficiency based on a meta dynamic non-radial DDF," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 7903-7926, March.
    8. Hao Zhang & Jianxin You & Xuekelaiti Haiyirete & Tianyu Zhang, 2020. "Measuring Logistics Efficiency in China Considering Technology Heterogeneity and Carbon Emission through a Meta-Frontier Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-18, October.
    9. Lin, Ruiyue & Peng, Yudan, 2024. "A new cross-efficiency meta-frontier analysis method with good ability to identify technology gaps," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(2), pages 735-746.
    10. Chen, Lei & Wang, Ying-Ming, 2023. "Game directional distance function in meta-frontier data envelopment analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    11. Cheng, Zhonghua & Liu, Jun & Li, Lianshui & Gu, Xinbei, 2020. "Research on meta-frontier total-factor energy efficiency and its spatial convergence in Chinese provinces," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    12. Li, Mingquan & Wang, Qi, 2014. "International environmental efficiency differences and their determinants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 411-420.
    13. Wang, Qunwei & Chiu, Yung-Ho & Chiu, Ching-Ren, 2017. "Non-radial metafrontier approach to identify carbon emission performance and intensity," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 664-672.
    14. Yu, Ming-Miin & Lin, Chung-I & Chen, Kuan-Chen & Chen, Li-Hsueh, 2021. "Measuring Taiwanese bank performance: A two-system dynamic network data envelopment analysis approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    15. Xingle Long & Yusen Luo & Huaping Sun & Gang Tian, 2018. "Fertilizer using intensity and environmental efficiency for China’s agriculture sector from 1997 to 2014," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 92(3), pages 1573-1591, July.
    16. Ding, Tao & Yang, Jie & Wu, Huaqing & Liang, Liang, 2022. "Land use efficiency and technology gaps of urban agglomerations in China: An extended non-radial meta-frontier approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    17. Ming‐Miin Yu & Yongli Guo & Kok Fong See, 2025. "Analysing group‐ and metatechnology efficiencies and technology gap of airlines for a sustainable future," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(2), pages 1649-1669, April.
    18. Asif Khan & Anju Goswami & Tonmoy Choudhury, 2025. "Technology gaps, social outreach and financial sustainability of South Asian MFIs: bootstrap DEA meta-frontier approach," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 1577-1606, June.
    19. Xiongfeng Pan & Jing Zhang & Changyu Li & Xianyou Pan & Jinbo Song, 2019. "Analysis of China’s regional wind power generation efficiency and its influencing factors," Energy & Environment, , vol. 30(2), pages 254-271, March.
    20. Zhang, Hui & Zhou, Peng & Sun, Xiumei & Ni, Guanqun, 2024. "Disparities in energy efficiency and its determinants in Chinese cities: From the perspective of heterogeneity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:102:y:2025:i:c:s0038012125001661. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/seps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.