IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/riibaf/v70y2024ipas0275531924001508.html

Some searches may not work properly. We apologize for the inconvenience.

   My bibliography  Save this article

Winners and losers from financial sector openness: A Firm’s international exposure matters

Author

Listed:
  • Ding, Haoyuan
  • Jin, Yuying
  • Jin, Zeyang
  • Nie, Guangyu

Abstract

We study the effects of financial sector openness on domestic firms. To do so, we explore a policy experiment following the announcement of a broad financial sector liberalization in China. We find that this event has heterogeneous stock-market effects on domestic firms. We use foreign ownership, overseas M&As and exports as proxy variables for international exposure, and find that firms with international exposure experience lower returns than the others. In addition, this negative influence of international exposure is weaker if the firm is state-owned, large, or located in a province with relatively high institution quality. We provide a stylized model that rationalizes these results, which shows that after the financial sector opens up, firms with international exposure lose their advantage in obtaining cheap credit, and face fiercer competition than before. Our findings shed novel light on the channels through which financial sector openness affect firms in developing countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Ding, Haoyuan & Jin, Yuying & Jin, Zeyang & Nie, Guangyu, 2024. "Winners and losers from financial sector openness: A Firm’s international exposure matters," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(PA).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:70:y:2024:i:pa:s0275531924001508
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102357
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531924001508
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102357?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:70:y:2024:i:pa:s0275531924001508. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ribaf .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.