IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/oprepe/v15y2025ics2214716025000326.html

Cloud seeding optimization under uncertainty: A Markov chain approach in a two-stage fuzzy-stochastic framework

Author

Listed:
  • Sadeghi, Mohammad
  • Yaghoubi, Saeed

Abstract

The occurrence of sequential droughts and various forms of water shortages globally underscores the urgent need for sustainable water management solutions. In this context, cloud seeding has gained attention for its potential to enhance precipitation, yet its effectiveness is often uncertain due to complex cloud microphysics and atmospheric conditions. Acknowledging the inherent uncertainty in this endeavor, in this study, we employ a two-stage stochastic framework, integrating strategic decisions (facility location and network design) and operational realizations (seeding planning according to storm trajectories). Additionally, our model also considers fuzzy nature of seeding parameters. Above all, we develop a Markov chain procedure to mathematically model the prediction of expected increase in precipitation across cloud seeding decision-making processes. The integration of these stochastic methods into existing deterministic models from the literature results in a multi-objective Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) model designed to maximize rain probability and coverage while minimizing system-wide costs. To enhance the scalability and efficiency of the model, valid inequalities are developed to reduce the domain of binary variables. Additionally, a Lagrangian relaxation technique is proposed, yielding exact optimal solutions within reasonable timeframes and facilitating the handling of continuous space instances. Finally, a real-world case study in Iran demonstrates significant enhancements in precipitation predictions, with the Markov chain procedure showing an average 55 % increase in expected rain probability based on optimized seeding decisions. Scenario-based stochastic programming yields an 11.7 % value of stochastic solution and 16.5 % expected value of perfect information for cloud seeding initiatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Sadeghi, Mohammad & Yaghoubi, Saeed, 2025. "Cloud seeding optimization under uncertainty: A Markov chain approach in a two-stage fuzzy-stochastic framework," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 15(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:oprepe:v:15:y:2025:i:c:s2214716025000326
    DOI: 10.1016/j.orp.2025.100356
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214716025000326
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.orp.2025.100356?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marshall L. Fisher, 2004. "The Lagrangian Relaxation Method for Solving Integer Programming Problems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(12_supple), pages 1861-1871, December.
    2. Zhalechian, M. & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. & Zahiri, B. & Mohammadi, M., 2016. "Sustainable design of a closed-loop location-routing-inventory supply chain network under mixed uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 182-214.
    3. Amir Mohammad Fathollahi-Fard & Abbas Ahmadi & Seyed Mohammad Javad Mirzapour Al-E-Hashem, 2020. "Sustainable closed-loop supply chain network for an integrated water supply and wastewater collection system under uncertainty," Post-Print hal-03004754, HAL.
    4. Mikhail A. Bragin, 2024. "Survey on Lagrangian relaxation for MILP: importance, challenges, historical review, recent advancements, and opportunities," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 333(1), pages 29-45, February.
    5. D’Ambrosio, Claudia & Lodi, Andrea & Wiese, Sven & Bragalli, Cristiana, 2015. "Mathematical programming techniques in water network optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(3), pages 774-788.
    6. Jimenez, Mariano & Arenas, Mar & Bilbao, Amelia & Rodri'guez, M. Victoria, 2007. "Linear programming with fuzzy parameters: An interactive method resolution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(3), pages 1599-1609, March.
    7. Randall, M. & Montgomery, J. & Lewis, A., 2022. "Robust temporal optimisation for a crop planning problem under climate change uncertainty," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 9(C).
    8. Pedro Henrique Liguori & A. Ridha Mahjoub & Guillaume Marques & Ruslan Sadykov & Eduardo Uchoa, 2023. "Nonrobust Strong Knapsack Cuts for Capacitated Location Routing and Related Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 71(5), pages 1577-1595, September.
    9. Sadeghi, Mohammad & Yaghoubi, Saeed, 2024. "Optimization models for cloud seeding network design and operations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(3), pages 1146-1167.
    10. Erick Delage & Sharon Arroyo & Yinyu Ye, 2014. "The Value of Stochastic Modeling in Two-Stage Stochastic Programs with Cost Uncertainty," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(6), pages 1377-1393, December.
    11. A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper, 1959. "Chance-Constrained Programming," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(1), pages 73-79, October.
    12. Correia, Isabel & Nickel, Stefan & Saldanha-da-Gama, Francisco, 2018. "A stochastic multi-period capacitated multiple allocation hub location problem: Formulation and inequalities," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 122-134.
    13. Raúl Baños & Juan Reca & Juan Martínez & Consolación Gil & Antonio Márquez, 2011. "Resilience Indexes for Water Distribution Network Design: A Performance Analysis Under Demand Uncertainty," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 25(10), pages 2351-2366, August.
    14. Marzieh Mozafari & Alireza Zabihi, 2020. "Robust Water Supply Chain Network Design under Uncertainty in Capacity," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(13), pages 4093-4112, October.
    15. Kibaek Kim & Sanjay Mehrotra, 2015. "A Two-Stage Stochastic Integer Programming Approach to Integrated Staffing and Scheduling with Application to Nurse Management," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(6), pages 1431-1451, December.
    16. Marshall L. Fisher, 2004. "Comments on ÜThe Lagrangian Relaxation Method for Solving Integer Programming ProblemsÝ," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(12_supple), pages 1872-1874, December.
    17. Liu, Dehai & Ji, Xiaoxian & Tang, Jiafu & Li, Hongyi, 2020. "A fuzzy cooperative game theoretic approach for multinational water resource spatiotemporal allocation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(3), pages 1025-1037.
    18. Dimitris Bertsimas & Nishanth Mundru, 2023. "Optimization-Based Scenario Reduction for Data-Driven Two-Stage Stochastic Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 71(4), pages 1343-1361, July.
    19. Ahmet B. Keha & Ismael R. de Farias & George L. Nemhauser, 2006. "A Branch-and-Cut Algorithm Without Binary Variables for Nonconvex Piecewise Linear Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(5), pages 847-858, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Madjid Tavana & Arash Khalili Nasr & Francisco J. Santos-Arteaga & Esmaeel Saberi & Hassan Mina, 2024. "An optimization model with a lagrangian relaxation algorithm for artificial internet of things-enabled sustainable circular supply chain networks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 342(1), pages 767-802, November.
    2. Yanling Chu & Xiaoju Zhang & Zhongzhen Yang, 2017. "Multiple quay cranes scheduling for double cycling in container terminals," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, July.
    3. An, Yu & Zhang, Yu & Zeng, Bo, 2015. "The reliable hub-and-spoke design problem: Models and algorithms," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 103-122.
    4. Dollevoet, Twan & van Essen, J. Theresia & Glorie, Kristiaan M., 2018. "Solution methods for the tray optimization problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 1070-1084.
    5. Alexandre Belloni & Mitchell J. Lovett & William Boulding & Richard Staelin, 2012. "Optimal Admission and Scholarship Decisions: Choosing Customized Marketing Offers to Attract a Desirable Mix of Customers," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 621-636, July.
    6. Zhizhu Lai & Qun Yue & Zheng Wang & Dongmei Ge & Yulong Chen & Zhihong Zhou, 2022. "The min-p robust optimization approach for facility location problem under uncertainty," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 1134-1160, September.
    7. Jiang, Yangsheng & Huangfu, Junjie & Xiao, Guosheng & Zhang, Yongxiang & Yao, Zhihong, 2025. "Energy-efficient trajectory design of connected automated vehicles platoon: A unified modeling approach using space-time-speed grid networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    8. Yokoya, Daisuke & Duin, Cees W. & Yamada, Takeo, 2011. "A reduction approach to the repeated assignment problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 210(2), pages 185-193, April.
    9. Zhang, Zheng & Wei, Yongqi & Xiong, Youming & Peng, Geng & Wang, Guorong & Lu, Jingsheng & Zhong, Lin & Wang, Jingpeng, 2022. "Influence of the location of drilling fluid loss on wellbore temperature distribution during drilling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PB).
    10. Jabbarzadeh, Armin & Fahimnia, Behnam & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing & Moghadam, Hani Shahmoradi, 2016. "Designing a supply chain resilient to major disruptions and supply/demand interruptions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 121-149.
    11. Junming Liu & Weiwei Chen & Jingyuan Yang & Hui Xiong & Can Chen, 2022. "Iterative Prediction-and-Optimization for E-Logistics Distribution Network Design," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 769-789, March.
    12. Springborn, Michael R., 2014. "Risk aversion and adaptive management: Insights from a multi-armed bandit model of invasive species risk," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 226-242.
    13. Zahra Mohammadian-Behbahani & Behrooz Karimi & Morteza Zarrabi & Ashkan mozdgir, 2025. "Designing an efficient supply chain network for public cord blood bank and quality prediction to improve performance: a case study in Iran," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 1-40, September.
    14. Li, Wenjie & Yang, Lixing & Wang, Li & Zhou, Xuesong & Liu, Ronghui & Gao, Ziyou, 2017. "Eco-reliable path finding in time-variant and stochastic networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 372-387.
    15. Zheng, Jianfeng & Meng, Qiang & Sun, Zhuo, 2014. "Impact analysis of maritime cabotage legislations on liner hub-and-spoke shipping network design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(3), pages 874-884.
    16. Wang, Shanshan & Mehrotra, Sanjay & Peng, Chun, 2025. "Robust concave utility maximization over chance constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 321(3), pages 800-813.
    17. Vasile BRĂTIAN, 2018. "Portfolio Optimization. Application of the Markowitz Model Using Lagrange and Profitability Forecast," Expert Journal of Economics, Sprint Investify, vol. 6(1), pages 26-34.
    18. Karademir, Cigdem & Beirigo, Breno A. & Atasoy, Bilge, 2025. "A two-echelon multi-trip vehicle routing problem with synchronization for an integrated water- and land-based transportation system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 322(2), pages 480-499.
    19. Zhang, Haoxiang & Huang, Zhenyu & Wang, Xuexin & Li, Chen & Liu, Youbo & Liu, Junyong, 2025. "Capacity investment portfolio optimization considering EV charging flexibility: A heuristic algorithm-informed system dynamics approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    20. Vibhute, Siddhant & Kowli, Anupama & Kulkarni, Ankur A., 2025. "Improved load approximation models and tractable solution schemes for home energy management," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 335(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:oprepe:v:15:y:2025:i:c:s2214716025000326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/operations-research-perspectives .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.