Ordinal notions of submodularity
We consider several ordinal formulations of submodularity, defined for arbitrary binary relations on lattices. Two of these formulations are essentially due to Kreps [Kreps, D.M., 1979. A representation theorem for "Preference for Flexibility". Econometrica 47 (3), 565-578] and one is a weakening of a notion due to Milgrom and Shannon [Milgrom, P., Shannon, C., 1994. Monotone comparative statics. Econometrica 62 (1), 157-180]. We show that any reflexive binary relation satisfying either of Kreps's definitions also satisfies Milgrom and Shannon's definition, and that any transitive and monotonic binary relation satisfying the Milgrom and Shannon's condition satisfies both of Kreps's conditions.
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Chambers, Christopher P. & Echenique, Federico, 2009. "Supermodularity and preferences," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 144(3), pages 1004-1014, May.
- Epstein, Larry G. & Marinacci, Massimo, 2007.
"Mutual absolute continuity of multiple priors,"
Journal of Economic Theory,
Elsevier, vol. 137(1), pages 716-720, November.
- Milgrom, P. & Shannon, C., 1991.
"Monotone Comparative Statics,"
11, Stanford - Institute for Thoretical Economics.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:mateco:v:44:y:2008:i:11:p:1243-1245. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Zhang, Lei)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.