IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v101y2021ics0264837719319350.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrated hedonic-utilitarian valuation of the built environment by neutrosophic INVAR method

Author

Listed:
  • Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
  • Kaklauskas, Arturas
  • Bausys, Romualdas
  • Naumcik, Andrej
  • Ubarte, Ieva

Abstract

Hedonic valuation models enable us to make relevant decisions concerning the equipage of the built environment amenities and to establish more correct price zoning and land use management. These studies examining the utilitarian and hedonic aspects of property often face issues: how can we measure and assess multisensory experiences of property buyers (their affective attitudes, emotional states and physiological parameters) in an integrated manner and make a decision? This fact was a vital goal of the integrated Neutrosophic Degree of Project Utility and Investment Value Assessments along with Recommendation Provisions (INVAR) method. About 200 million multisensory data points have been collected so far and, as a result of their correlation analysis, several tens of thousands of average and robust correlations were determined. The new Neutrosophic INVAR method offers a bigger, more detailed picture of the hedonic-utilitarian value of the property. Another benefit of the Neutrosophic INVAR method is its ability to assist in assessing any project, determining its integrated hedonic-utilitarian value and offering tips on ways to make the project better. The Neutrosophic INVAR method can also optimise any criterion of your choice to make a specific project as competitive in the market and can determine the value that would propel the project to the top among the projects discussed. The analysis performed in this research is the basis for asserting that a sustainable development policy for housing and a surrounding environment is only possible by analysing the two-way process of interactions between a built environment and its neighbourhood residents in an integrated manner.

Suggested Citation

  • Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras & Kaklauskas, Arturas & Bausys, Romualdas & Naumcik, Andrej & Ubarte, Ieva, 2021. "Integrated hedonic-utilitarian valuation of the built environment by neutrosophic INVAR method," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:101:y:2021:i:c:s0264837719319350
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105150
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837719319350
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105150?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abastante, Francesca & Corrente, Salvatore & Greco, Salvatore & Ishizaka, Alessio & Lami, Isabella M., 2018. "Choice architecture for architecture choices: Evaluating social housing initiatives putting together a parsimonious AHP methodology and the Choquet integral," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 748-762.
    2. Babin, Barry J & Darden, William R & Griffin, Mitch, 1994. "Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 20(4), pages 644-656, March.
    3. Babin, Barry J. & Griffin, Mitch & Borges, Adilson & Boles, James S., 2013. "Negative emotions, value and relationships: Differences between women and men," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 20(5), pages 471-478.
    4. Gilles Laurent & Pierre Chandon & Brian Wansink, 2000. "A Benefit Congruency Framework of Sales Promotion Effectiveness," Post-Print hal-00458440, HAL.
    5. Coro Chasco & Julie Le Gallo, 2013. "The Impact of Objective and Subjective Measures of Air Quality and Noise on House Prices: A Multilevel Approach for Downtown Madrid," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 89(2), pages 127-148, April.
    6. Taeho Yoh & Houston (Yentin) Chen & Incheol Jang, 2016. "Utilitarian and Hedonic Consumption Values on American College Students’ Athletic Footwear Purchase Intention," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 6(12), pages 307-320, December.
    7. Boris A. Portnov, 2010. "Objective Vs. Perceived Air-Pollution As A Factor Of Housing Pricing: A Case Study Of The Greater Haifa Metropolitan Area," ERES eres2010_021, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    8. Popovic, Gabrijela & Stanujkic, Dragisa & Brzakovic, Miodrag & Karabasevic, Darjan, 2019. "A multiple-criteria decision-making model for the selection of a hotel location," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 49-58.
    9. Fernandez, Mario Andres & Bucaram, Santiago, 2019. "The changing face of environmental amenities: Heterogeneity across housing submarkets and time," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 449-460.
    10. Andrew E. Clark & Sarah Flèche & Nick Powdthavee & George Ward, 2017. "The key determinants of happiness and misery," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-01513376, HAL.
    11. Yuan, Feng & Wu, Jiawei & Wei, Yehua Dennis & Wang, Lei, 2018. "Policy change, amenity, and spatiotemporal dynamics of housing prices in Nanjing, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 225-236.
    12. Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Romualdas Baušys & Marius Lazauskas, 2015. "Sustainable Assessment of Alternative Sites for the Construction of a Waste Incineration Plant by Applying WASPAS Method with Single-Valued Neutrosophic Set," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-14, December.
    13. Saira Aziz & Waseem Bahadur & Salman Zulfiqar & Binesh Sarwar & Khurram Ejaz Chandia & Muhammad Badr Iqbal, 2018. "Do emotions bring customers to an environment: Evidence from Pakistani shoppers?," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 1536305-153, January.
    14. Park, Joohyung & Ha, Sejin, 2016. "Co-creation of service recovery: Utilitarian and hedonic value and post-recovery responses," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 310-316.
    15. Kesari, Bikrant & Atulkar, Sunil, 2016. "Satisfaction of mall shoppers: A study on perceived utilitarian and hedonic shopping values," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 22-31.
    16. Łaszkiewicz, Edyta & Czembrowski, Piotr & Kronenberg, Jakub, 2019. "Can proximity to urban green spaces be considered a luxury? Classifying a non-tradable good with the use of hedonic pricing method," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 237-247.
    17. Cordera, Ruben & Coppola, Pierluigi & dell'Olio, Luigi & Ibeas, Ángel, 2019. "The impact of accessibility by public transport on real estate values: A comparison between the cities of Rome and Santander," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 308-319.
    18. Stoel, Leslie & Wickliffe, Vanessa & Lee, Kyu Hye, 2004. "Attribute beliefs and spending as antecedents to shopping value," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(10), pages 1067-1073, October.
    19. Jones, Michael A. & Reynolds, Kristy E. & Arnold, Mark J., 2006. "Hedonic and utilitarian shopping value: Investigating differential effects on retail outcomes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(9), pages 974-981, September.
    20. Sebastian Galiani & Paul J Gertler & Raimundo Undurraga, 2018. "The Half-Life of Happiness: Hedonic Adaptation in the Subjective Well-Being of Poor Slum Dwellers to the Satisfaction of Basic Housing Needs," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 16(4), pages 1189-1233.
    21. Timo Zumbro, 2014. "The Relationship Between Homeownership and Life Satisfaction in Germany," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 319-338, April.
    22. repec:arz:wpaper:eres2010-021 is not listed on IDEAS
    23. Garaus, Marion & Wagner, Udo & Manzinger, Sandra, 2017. "Happy grocery shopper: The creation of positive emotions through affective digital signage content," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 295-305.
    24. Zhang, Lei & Yi, Yimin, 2017. "Quantile house price indices in Beijing," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 85-96.
    25. Holbrook, Morris B & Hirschman, Elizabeth C, 1982. "The Experiential Aspects of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings, and Fun," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 9(2), pages 132-140, September.
    26. Holbrook, Morris B., 2006. "Consumption experience, customer value, and subjective personal introspection: An illustrative photographic essay," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(6), pages 714-725, June.
    27. Edyta Rudawska & Kristina Petljak & Ivana Stulec, 2015. "Hedonic or utilitarian buying behaviours - what values do young adult customers seek in online group buying?," International Journal of Business Performance Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(2/3), pages 182-197.
    28. Gabbi, Giampaolo & Zanotti, Giovanna, 2019. "Sex & the City. Are financial decisions driven by emotions?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 50-57.
    29. LAURENT, Gilles & CHANDON, Pierre & WANSINK, Brian, 2000. "A benefit congruency framework of sales promotion effectiveness," HEC Research Papers Series 698, HEC Paris.
    30. Babin, Barry J. & Attaway, Jill S., 2000. "Atmospheric Affect as a Tool for Creating Value and Gaining Share of Customer," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 91-99, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huré, Elodie & Picot-Coupey, Karine & Ackermann, Claire-Lise, 2017. "Understanding omni-channel shopping value: A mixed-method study," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 314-330.
    2. Atulkar, Sunil & Kesari, Bikrant, 2017. "Satisfaction, loyalty and repatronage intentions: Role of hedonic shopping values," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 23-34.
    3. Lo, Ada & Qu, Hailin, 2015. "A theoretical model of the impact of a bundle of determinants on tourists’ visiting and shopping intentions: A case of mainland Chinese tourists," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 231-243.
    4. Davis, Lizhu & Hodges, Nancy, 2012. "Consumer shopping value: An investigation of shopping trip value, in-store shopping value and retail format," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 229-239.
    5. Bhat Ishfaq Hussain & Singh Sapna, 2018. "Examining the moderating effect of shopping value on private-label and loyalty in Indian grocery stores," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 748-760, March.
    6. Kesari, Bikrant & Atulkar, Sunil, 2016. "Satisfaction of mall shoppers: A study on perceived utilitarian and hedonic shopping values," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 22-31.
    7. Han Yu & Rong Zhang & Bin Liu, 2018. "Analysis on Consumers’ Purchase and Shopping Well-Being in Online Shopping Carnivals with Two Motivational Dimensions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-18, December.
    8. Hsin-Hui Lin, 2011. "Gender differences in the linkage of online patronage behavior with TV-and-online shopping values," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 5(4), pages 295-312, December.
    9. Chiu, Hung-Chang & Hsieh, Yi-Ching & Li, Yu-Chuan & Lee, Monle, 2005. "Relationship marketing and consumer switching behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(12), pages 1681-1689, December.
    10. Ben Mimoun, Mohammed Slim & Poncin, Ingrid, 2015. "A valued agent: How ECAs affect website customers' satisfaction and behaviors," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 70-82.
    11. Khare, Arpita, 2011. "Mall shopping behaviour of Indian small town consumers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 110-118.
    12. Garaus, Marion & Wagner, Udo & Kummer, Claudia, 2015. "Cognitive fit, retail shopper confusion, and shopping value: Empirical investigation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(5), pages 1003-1011.
    13. Wen-Kuo Chen & Dong-Shang Chang & Chun-Cheng Chen, 2017. "The Role of Utilitarian and Hedonic Values on Users' Continued Usage and Purchase Intention in a Social Commerce Environment," Journal of Economics and Management, College of Business, Feng Chia University, Taiwan, vol. 13(2), pages 193-220, August.
    14. Jackson, Vanessa & Stoel, Leslie & Brantley, Aquia, 2011. "Mall attributes and shopping value: Differences by gender and generational cohort," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 1-9.
    15. Hye Jung Jung & HaeJung Kim & Kyung Wha Oh, 2016. "Green Leather for Ethical Consumers in China and Korea: Facilitating Ethical Consumption with Value–Belief–Attitude Logic," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(3), pages 483-502, May.
    16. İpek, İlayda & Aşkın, Nilay & İlter, Burcu, 2016. "Private label usage and store loyalty: The moderating impact of shopping value," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 72-79.
    17. Sammon, Rachel & Kwon, Kyoung-Nan, 2015. "Host׳s interpersonal influence on guests in a home sales party," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 32-38.
    18. Wang, Yi-Shun & Yeh, Ching-Hsuan & Liao, Yi-Wen, 2013. "What drives purchase intention in the context of online content services? The moderating role of ethical self-efficacy for online piracy," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 199-208.
    19. Scarpi, Daniele, 2012. "Work and Fun on the Internet: The Effects of Utilitarianism and Hedonism Online," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 53-67.
    20. Pedro Quelhas Brito & Peter J. McGoldrick & Umesh Ramchandra Raut, 2019. "Shopping Centre Patronage: Situational Factors Against Affect," Vision, , vol. 23(2), pages 189-196, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:101:y:2021:i:c:s0264837719319350. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.