IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v90y2024ics0301420724001041.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The strategic role of lithium in the green energy transition: Towards an OPEC-style framework for green energy-mineral exporting countries (GEMEC)

Author

Listed:
  • Ghorbani, Yousef
  • Zhang, Steven E.
  • Bourdeau, Julie E.
  • Chipangamate, Nelson S.
  • Rose, Derek H.
  • Valodia, Imraan
  • Nwaila, Glen T.

Abstract

The energy sector is currently undergoing a transition towards increased utilization of green energy technologies. The green energy transition relies heavily on metals, such as aluminium, chromium, cobalt, copper, lithium, manganese, nickel, rare earth elements (REEs), silicon, tin, titanium, tungsten and zinc, among others. However, this transition occurs within the context of: (1) a geographical concentration of known mineral deposits and downstream capability; (2) a demand that vastly exceeds supply; (3) a strong drive to mitigate environmental and energy concerns; and (4) an increasing level of geopolitical conflicts. Consequently, the energy transition is not straightforward, as it intensifies material demand, market and geopolitical competition. This is especially true for lithium which is pivotal in this transformation. Concerns driven by material access, energy sustainability and national sufficiency are increasingly resulting in national and super-national geopolitical activities, such as resource nationalisation, forming strategic or trade alliances, encouraging near- and friend-shoring, promoting material circularity, and accelerating green technology research and deployment. This study examines the global impact of the green energy transition, from the perspective of the mineral value chain, including downstream products, its implications on the projected demand, and geopolitics. There are many potential outcomes in the future, depending on: (1) the pragmatic outcomes of the energy transition, which is only empirically realizable through implementation; (2) the strength of independence and global stability; and (3) the rise of regional or friendly trade blocs. In particular, this study examines a future scenario in which there is an emergence of an OPEC-style organisation for green energy minerals and metals (GEMMs), focusing on lithium as an example, because: (1) it has a clear and essential role in the green energy transition; (2) it is geographically concentrated in a manner that facilitates production coordination; and (3) it is overwhelmingly consumed by developed nations but supplied by developing nations. An organisation built around lithium could be a prototype to other GEMM markets. Consequently, we propose that it is possible to leverage existing circumstances and propose that such an organisation, here termed Green Energy-Mineral Exporting Countries, or “GEMEC”, could serve as a collaborative platform to enhance geopolitical positioning, maximise economic benefits through coordinated production and export policies, and address the environmental, social and governance challenges associated with the green energy transition.

Suggested Citation

  • Ghorbani, Yousef & Zhang, Steven E. & Bourdeau, Julie E. & Chipangamate, Nelson S. & Rose, Derek H. & Valodia, Imraan & Nwaila, Glen T., 2024. "The strategic role of lithium in the green energy transition: Towards an OPEC-style framework for green energy-mineral exporting countries (GEMEC)," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:90:y:2024:i:c:s0301420724001041
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104737
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420724001041
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104737?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:90:y:2024:i:c:s0301420724001041. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.