IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jouret/v96y2020i3p397-410.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Upside of Down: Presenting a Price in a Low or High Location Influences How Consumers Evaluate It

Author

Listed:
  • Barone, Michael J.
  • Coulter, Keith S.
  • Li, Xingbo

Abstract

Can changing the vertical location of a price (e.g., presenting it above or below a product image in an advertisement or retail display) influence consumer response? Drawing from conceptual metaphor theory, we propose that a price’s vertical location can activate metaphors that relate vertical locations to magnitudinal concepts. These “down=less” and “up=more” metaphors can subsequently influence evaluations of a target price as being monetarily low or high in magnitude. Consistent with this premise, several lab and field investigations demonstrate that prices provided in low (vs. high) locations lead to lower price perceptions, more favorable purchase intentions, and higher in-store sales. Two final studies directly implicate the role of “down=less” and “up=more” metaphors by demonstrating that such price location effects a) arise only among individuals who associate down with less and up with more and b) are attenuated when inconsistent spatial-magnitude associations (i.e., those relating down with more and up with less) are primed. The theoretical and managerial implications of these findings are discussed as are future research directions.

Suggested Citation

  • Barone, Michael J. & Coulter, Keith S. & Li, Xingbo, 2020. "The Upside of Down: Presenting a Price in a Low or High Location Influences How Consumers Evaluate It," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 96(3), pages 397-410.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jouret:v:96:y:2020:i:3:p:397-410
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jretai.2020.02.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022435920300130
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jretai.2020.02.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grewal, Dhruv & Roggeveen, Anne L. & Nordfält, Jens, 2017. "The Future of Retailing," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 1-6.
    2. Babin, Barry J. & Hardesty, David M. & Suter, Tracy A., 2003. "Color and shopping intentions: The intervening effect of price fairness and perceived affect," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(7), pages 541-551, July.
    3. Manoj Thomas, 2013. "Commentary on behavioral price research: the role of subjective experiences in price cognition," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 3(3), pages 141-145, September.
    4. Wagner, Alfred, 1891. "Marshall's Principles of Economics," History of Economic Thought Articles, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, vol. 5, pages 319-338.
    5. Luca Cian, 2017. "Verticality and Conceptual Metaphors: A Systematic Review," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 2(4), pages 444-459.
    6. Valenzuela, Ana & Raghubir, Priya & Mitakakis, Chrissy, 2013. "Shelf space schemas: Myth or reality?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(7), pages 881-888.
    7. Anneleen Van Kerckhove & Maggie Geuens & Iris Vermeir, 2015. "The Floor Is Nearer than the Sky: How Looking Up or Down Affects Construal Level," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 41(6), pages 1358-1371.
    8. DelVecchio, Devon & Lakshmanan, Arun & Krishnan, H. Shanker, 2009. "The Effects of Discount Location and Frame on Consumers’ Price Estimates," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 85(3), pages 336-346.
    9. Puccinelli, Nancy M. & Chandrashekaran, Rajesh & Grewal, Dhruv & Suri, Rajneesh, 2013. "Are Men Seduced by Red? The Effect of Red Versus Black Prices on Price Perceptions," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 89(2), pages 115-125.
    10. Giessner, S.R. & Schubert, T.W., 2007. "High in the Hierarchy: How Vertical Location and Judgments of Leaders' Power are Interrelated," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2007-021-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    11. Giessner, Steffen R. & Schubert, Thomas W., 2007. "High in the hierarchy: How vertical location and judgments of leaders' power are interrelated," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 104(1), pages 30-44, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Jie & Zhang, Xiadan & Jiang, Jing, 2022. "Healthy-Angular, unhealthy-circular: Effects of the fit between shapes and healthiness on consumer food preferences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 740-750.
    2. Katina Kulow & Keith S. Coulter & Michael J. Barone & Xingbo (Bo) Li, 2022. "How internal reference prices determine when a price’s location will influence consumer judgments," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 563-575, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chan, Eugene Y. & Northey, Gavin, 2021. "Luxury goods in online retail: How high/low positioning influences consumer processing fluency and preference," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 136-145.
    2. Machiels, Casparus J.A. & Orth, Ulrich R., 2017. "Verticality in product labels and shelves as a metaphorical cue to quality," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 195-203.
    3. Aparna Sundar & James J. Kellaris, 2017. "How Logo Colors Influence Shoppers’ Judgments of Retailer Ethicality: The Mediating Role of Perceived Eco-Friendliness," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 146(3), pages 685-701, December.
    4. Grandi, Benedetta & Cardinali, Maria Grazia, 2022. "Colours and price offers: How different price communications can affect sales and customers’ perceptions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    5. Aitao Lu & Meichao Zhang & Yulan Shao & Yanping Yu & Shuang Zheng & Jing Ye & Hui Yi & Lu Wang, 2015. "What Directions Do We Look at Power from? Up-Down, Left-Right, and Front-Back," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, July.
    6. Liang, Yongyi & Yan, Ming & Law, Kenneth S. & Wang, Haibo & Chen, Yuanyi, 2021. "Integrating the bright and dark sides of leadership: An investigation of the intragroup and intergroup effects of leader group prototypicality," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 89-97.
    7. Edward Bishop Smith & Tanya Menon & Leigh Thompson, 2012. "Status Differences in the Cognitive Activation of Social Networks," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 67-82, February.
    8. Geng, Liuna & Liu, Ting & Zhou, Kexin & Yang, Genmao, 2018. "Can power affect environmental risk attitude toward nuclear energy?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 87-93.
    9. Menon, Tanya & Sim, Jessica & Fu, Jeanne Ho-Ying & Chiu, Chi-yue & Hong, Ying-yi, 2010. "Blazing the trail versus trailing the group: Culture and perceptions of the leader's position," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 51-61, September.
    10. Nicole Koschate-Fischer & Katharina Wüllner, 2017. "New developments in behavioral pricing research," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(6), pages 809-875, August.
    11. Elena Beketova & Irina Leontyeva & Svetlana Zubanova & Aleksandr Gryaznukhin & Vasily Movchun, 2020. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Creating an optimal environment for distance learning in higher education: discovering leadership issues," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 1-6, June.
    12. Kelting, Katie & Berry, Christopher & van Horen, Femke, 2019. "The presence of copycat private labels in a product set increases consumers' choice ease when shopping with an abstract mindset," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 264-274.
    13. Bittmann, Felix, 2020. "The relationship between height and leadership: Evidence from across Europe," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 36(C).
    14. Mead, James A. & Richerson, Rob & Li, Wenjing, 2020. "Dynamic Right-Slanted Fonts Increase the Effectiveness of Promotional Retail Advertising," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 282-296.
    15. González, Eva M. & Meyer, Jan-Hinrich & Paz Toldos, M., 2021. "What women want? How contextual product displays influence women’s online shopping behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 625-641.
    16. Michael J. Barone & Xingbo Li & Karen Page Winterich & Keith B. Lyle, 2018. "Social-Spatial Effects in Pricing: When and How Vertical Orientations Shape Processing of Price Comparisons," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 5(3), pages 137-145, December.
    17. Hsieh, Yi-Ching & Chiu, Hung-Chang & Tang, Yun-Chia & Lee, Monle, 2018. "Do Colors Change Realities in Online Shopping?," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 14-27.
    18. Schaerer, Michael & du Plessis, Christilene & Yap, Andy J. & Thau, Stefan, 2018. "Low power individuals in social power research: A quantitative review, theoretical framework, and empirical test," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 73-96.
    19. Elmashhara, Maher Georges & Soares, Ana Maria, 2022. "Linking atmospherics to shopping outcomes: The role of the desire to stay," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    20. van Quaquebeke, N. & Giessner, S.R., 2010. "How Embodied Cognitions Affect Judgments: Height-Related Attribution Bias in Football Foul Calls," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2010-006-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jouret:v:96:y:2020:i:3:p:397-410. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.