IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jhecon/v105y2026ics0167629625001377.html

Workforce impacts of subsidised mental healthcare: Evidence on supply, geographic distribution, and earnings

Author

Listed:
  • Black, Nicole
  • Harris, Anthony
  • Johnston, David W.
  • Trinh, Trong-Anh

Abstract

To improve access to affordable mental healthcare, Australia introduced a national, publicly-funded program in 2006 to subsidise psychological services, which were previously privately funded. Theory suggests that by increasing demand, subsidies should incentivise providers to expand supply, either by entering the workforce or by increasing hours. However, expansion depends on supply constraints, particularly in non-metropolitan areas with pronounced workforce shortages. This study examines the program’s effects on the size, work hours, demographic composition, location, and earnings of psychologists. Using an event-study design with administrative tax records and census data, we find that the program: (1) increased the supply of psychologists, with minimal effect on average hours worked per psychologist; (2) increased the likelihood of psychologists working in non-metropolitan areas, supporting broader access to mental healthcare; and (3) raised psychologists’ annual personal incomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Black, Nicole & Harris, Anthony & Johnston, David W. & Trinh, Trong-Anh, 2026. "Workforce impacts of subsidised mental healthcare: Evidence on supply, geographic distribution, and earnings," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jhecon:v:105:y:2026:i:c:s0167629625001377
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2025.103102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167629625001377
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2025.103102?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • I10 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - General
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jhecon:v:105:y:2026:i:c:s0167629625001377. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505560 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.