IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jfpoli/v116y2023ics0306919223000350.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Captive school markets, industry self-regulation, and public-private partnerships: Narratives shaping the development of alternative proteins in the United States, 1965–1982

Author

Listed:
  • von Kaufmann, Freddie
  • Skafida, Valeria

Abstract

This paper examines the interplay between government, industry and other stakeholders, and the key narratives shaping the development and regulation of alternative protein products in the US in the 1960s to early 1980s, paying particular attention to how the US National School Lunch Programme was used for the development of these products. Using internal food industry documents sourced from the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) Food Industry Documents Archive, we find that the US government proactively paved the way for industry to develop alternative protein products by: (a) providing government funding for textured vegetable protein product research and development; (b) opening the doors to lucrative markets; and (c) supporting a lenient regulatory environment for alternative protein products to be developed. A key market for textured vegetable protein products was the US National School Lunch Programme, which was treated as a captive market for developing new products and formulations. The motivations for introducing textured vegetable proteins in schools differed between government and industry, principally between: offering cost-savings and alleviating malnutrition and food insecurity versus developing profitable new food products. Industry actors actively sought to modify the regulatory environment to favour commercial interests, and the government was slow to regulate the alternative protein industry and relied on industry self-regulation. Our research is particularly relevant, because of what appears to be renewed interest in recent years in using school meal programs for the development of alternative-proteins, a phenomenon not limited to the US.

Suggested Citation

  • von Kaufmann, Freddie & Skafida, Valeria, 2023. "Captive school markets, industry self-regulation, and public-private partnerships: Narratives shaping the development of alternative proteins in the United States, 1965–1982," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:116:y:2023:i:c:s0306919223000350
    DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102437
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919223000350
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102437?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bishai, David & Nalubola, Ritu, 2002. "The History of Food Fortification in the United States: Its Relevance for Current Fortification Efforts in Developing Countries," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 51(1), pages 37-53, October.
    2. Ronette R. Briefel & Mary Kay Crepinsek & Charlotte Cabili & Ander Wilson & Philip M. Gleason, 2009. "School Food Environments and Practices Affect Dietary Behaviors of US Public School Children," Mathematica Policy Research Reports c6dbf718e7a54cb0ab738b653, Mathematica Policy Research.
    3. Knai, C. & Petticrew, M. & Durand, M.A. & Eastmure, E. & James, L. & Mehrotra, A. & Scott, C. & Mays, N., 2015. "Has a public–private partnership resulted in action on healthier diets in England? An analysis of the Public Health Responsibility Deal food pledges," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1-10.
    4. Elie Dolgin, 2019. "Sizzling interest in lab-grown meat belies lack of basic research," Nature, Nature, vol. 566(7743), pages 161-162, February.
    5. Price, Charlene & Kuhn, Betsey, 1996. "Public and Private Efforts for the National School Lunch Program," Food Review/ National Food Review, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 19(2), pages 1-7.
    6. de Boer, Joop & Aiking, Harry, 2011. "On the merits of plant-based proteins for global food security: Marrying macro and micro perspectives," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(7), pages 1259-1265, May.
    7. Mello, M.M. & Pomeranz, J. & Moran, P., 2008. "The interplay of public health law and industry self-regulation: The case of sugar-sweetened beverage sales in schools," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 98(4), pages 595-604.
    8. Carters-White, Lauren & Chambers, Stephanie & Skivington, Kathryn & Hilton, Shona, 2021. "Whose rights deserve protection? Framing analysis of responses to the 2016 Committee of Advertising Practice consultation on the non-broadcast advertising of foods and soft drinks to children," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    9. Sharma, L.L. & Teret, S.P. & Brownell, K.D., 2010. "The food industry and self-regulation: Standards to promote success and to avoid public health failures," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 100(2), pages 240-246.
    10. Landwehr, Stefanie C. & Hartmann, Monika, 2020. "Industry self-regulation of food advertisement to children: Compliance versus effectiveness of the EU Pledge," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    11. repec:mpr:mprres:6160 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Landman, A. & Ling, P.M. & Glantz, S.A., 2002. "Tobacco industry youth smoking prevention programs: Protecting the industry and hurting tobacco control," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 92(6), pages 917-930.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Susan L. Prescott & Christopher R. D’Adamo & Kathleen F. Holton & Selena Ortiz & Nina Overby & Alan C. Logan, 2023. "Beyond Plants: The Ultra-Processing of Global Diets Is Harming the Health of People, Places, and Planet," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(15), pages 1-21, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Henry, Doug & Partin, Kelly & LoParco, Cassidy R & Rossheim, Matthew, 2023. "The U.S. hemp-derived cannabinoid industry and the potential of self-regulation: Using social media to assess an evolving health risk," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 334(C).
    2. Ariun Ishdorj & Mary Kay Crepinsek & Helen H. Jensen, 2013. "Children's Consumption of Fruits and Vegetables: Do School Environment and Policies Affect Choices at School and Away from School?," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 35(2), pages 341-359.
    3. Nader Hamdi & Brenna Ellison & Jennifer McCaffrey & Jessica Jarick Metcalfe & Ashley Hoffman & Pamela Haywood & Melissa Pflugh Prescott, 2020. "Implementation of a Multi-Component School Lunch Environmental Change Intervention to Improve Child Fruit and Vegetable Intake: A Mixed-Methods Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-17, June.
    4. Barraclough, Simon & Morrow, Martha, 2008. "A grim contradiction: The practice and consequences of corporate social responsibility by British American Tobacco in Malaysia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(8), pages 1784-1796, April.
    5. Austgulen, Marthe H. & Skuland, Silje & Schjøll, Alexander & Alfnes, Frode, 2015. "Consumer readiness to reduce meat consumptions and eat more climate friendly," 143rd Joint EAAE/AAEA Seminar, March 25-27, 2015, Naples, Italy 202757, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Feyrer, James & Politi, Dimitra & Weil, David N., 2010. "The Economic Effects of Micronutrient Deficiency: Evidence from Salt Iodization in the United States," SIRE Discussion Papers 2010-10, Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE).
    7. Kraak, Vivica I. & Swinburn, Boyd & Lawrence, Mark & Harrison, Paul, 2014. "A Q methodology study of stakeholders’ views about accountability for promoting healthy food environments in England through the Responsibility Deal Food Network," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(P1), pages 207-218.
    8. Luc Brès & Sébastien Mena & Marie‐Laure Salles‐Djelic, 2019. "Exploring the formal and informal roles of regulatory intermediaries in transnational multistakeholder regulation," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(2), pages 127-140, June.
    9. Kaleb S. Jada & Mequanint B. Melesse & Marrit Berg, 2023. "The effects of safety certification and nutrition messaging on the demand for nutritionally enhanced food in urban Ethiopia," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 15(2), pages 395-409, April.
    10. Knai, C. & Petticrew, M. & Durand, M.A. & Eastmure, E. & James, L. & Mehrotra, A. & Scott, C. & Mays, N., 2015. "Has a public–private partnership resulted in action on healthier diets in England? An analysis of the Public Health Responsibility Deal food pledges," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1-10.
    11. Gian-Andrea Egeler & Priska Baur, 2022. "Menu Choice and Meat-Eating Habits: Results of a Field Experiment in Two University Canteens," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-13, March.
    12. Marthe Hårvik Austgulen & Silje Elisabeth Skuland & Alexander Schjøll & Frode Alfnes, 2018. "Consumer Readiness to Reduce Meat Consumption for the Purpose of Environmental Sustainability: Insights from Norway," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-24, August.
    13. Hoek, Janet & Newcombe, Rhiannon & Walker, Sue, 2011. "Promoting youth smokefree behaviour: An evaluation of a social norms campaign," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 58-64.
    14. Julie V. Stanton & Deirdre T. Guion, 2013. "Taking Advantage of a Vulnerable Group? Emotional Cues in Ads Targeting Parents," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(3), pages 485-517, November.
    15. Michael Stahlman & Laura McCann, 2012. "Technology characteristics, choice architecture, and farmer knowledge: the case of phytase," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 29(3), pages 371-379, September.
    16. Anis Suriati Ahmad & Zuriadah Ismail, 2016. "A Grim Reality: The Practice of CSR by Tobacco Company," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 6(11), pages 1-15, November.
    17. Emily Savell & Anna B Gilmore & Gary Fooks, 2014. "How Does the Tobacco Industry Attempt to Influence Marketing Regulations? A Systematic Review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-10, February.
    18. Andres Silva & Lindsey M. Higgins & Micaela M. Kulesz, 2016. "Nutritional Impact of Child-Directed TV Food Advertising Regulation: Are We Rearranging the Deck Chairs on the Titanic?," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(3), pages 422-444.
    19. Evita Pangaribowo & Nicolas Gerber & Pascal Tillie, 2013. "Assessing the FNS impacts of technological and institutional innovations and future innovation trends," FOODSECURE Working papers 11, LEI Wageningen UR.
    20. Kevin C. Davis & Matthew C. Farrelly & Peter Messeri & Jennifer Duke, 2009. "The Impact of National Smoking Prevention Campaigns on Tobacco-Related Beliefs, Intentions to Smoke and Smoking Initiation: Results from a Longitudinal Survey of Youth in the United States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-19, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:116:y:2023:i:c:s0306919223000350. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/foodpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.