IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jfpoli/v105y2021ics0306919221001263.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Viewpoint: Social monitoring for food policy and research: Directions and implications

Author

Listed:
  • Delmastro, Marco
  • Zollo, Fabiana

Abstract

In the new digital ecosystem, consumers are overwhelmed with information, sometimes unreliable, and participate in the public debate through social media based on their perceptions and beliefs. For these reasons, the monitoring of social media has become an essential and powerful tool for understanding dynamically and in real-time the information set available to the public, the perceptions of consumers, the presence of any biases and false beliefs. The large availability of data generated online enables the unveiling and analysis of socio-cognitive factors behind food information consumption and processing. In this paper, we provide an overview of issues, methods, and techniques for quantitative social monitoring and discuss benefits and implications for food policy and research.

Suggested Citation

  • Delmastro, Marco & Zollo, Fabiana, 2021. "Viewpoint: Social monitoring for food policy and research: Directions and implications," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:105:y:2021:i:c:s0306919221001263
    DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919221001263
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102147?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Meyer, Christian & Hamer, Martin & Terlau, Wiltrud & Raithel, Johannes & Pongratz, Patrick, 2015. "Web Data Mining and Social Media Analysis for better Communication in Food Safety Crises," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 6(3), pages 1-10, July.
    2. Carl Shapiro, 1982. "Consumer Information, Product Quality, and Seller Reputation," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 13(1), pages 20-35, Spring.
    3. Carmen Valor, 2008. "Can Consumers Buy Responsibly? Analysis and Solutions for Market Failures," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 315-326, September.
    4. Shanto Iyengar & Sean J. Westwood, 2015. "Fear and Loathing Across Party Lines: New Evidence on Group Polarization," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 59(3), pages 690-707, July.
    5. Stefano Castriota & Marco Delmastro, 2015. "The Economics of Collective Reputation: Evidence from the Wine Industry," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 97(2), pages 469-489.
    6. Sinan Aral & Dylan Walker, 2014. "Tie Strength, Embeddedness, and Social Influence: A Large-Scale Networked Experiment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(6), pages 1352-1370, June.
    7. Cox, D.R. & Kartsonaki, Christiana & Keogh, Ruth H., 2018. "Big data: Some statistical issues," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 111-115.
    8. Christopher A. Bail & Lisa P. Argyle & Taylor W. Brown & John P. Bumpus & Haohan Chen & M. B. Fallin Hunzaker & Jaemin Lee & Marcus Mann & Friedolin Merhout & Alexander Volfovsky, 2018. "Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 115(37), pages 9216-9221, September.
    9. Henson, Spencer & Traill, Bruce, 1993. "The demand for food safety : Market imperfections and the role of government," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 152-162, April.
    10. Robert Eiss, 2020. "Confusion over Europe’s data-protection law is stalling scientific progress," Nature, Nature, vol. 584(7822), pages 498-498, August.
    11. Meyer, Christian & Hamer, Martin & Terlau, Wiltrud & Raithel, Johannes & Pongratz, Patrick, 2015. "Web Data Mining and Social Media Analysis for better Communication in Food Safety Crises," 2015 International European Forum (144th EAAE Seminar), February 9-13, 2015, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 206212, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    12. Schroeder Ted C. & Tonsor Glynn T. & Pennings Joost M.E. & Mintert James, 2007. "Consumer Food Safety Risk Perceptions and Attitudes: Impacts on Beef Consumption across Countries," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 1-29, December.
    13. Schroeder, Ted C. & Tonsor, Glynn T. & Pennings, Joost M.E. & Mintert, James R., 2007. "The Role of Consumer Risk Perceptions and Attitudes in Cross Cultural Beef Consumption Changes," 2007 Annual Meeting, July 29-August 1, 2007, Portland, Oregon 10254, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    14. Robert M. Bond & Christopher J. Fariss & Jason J. Jones & Adam D. I. Kramer & Cameron Marlow & Jaime E. Settle & James H. Fowler, 2012. "A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization," Nature, Nature, vol. 489(7415), pages 295-298, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Caroll Hermann & Melanie Govender, 2022. "eHealth Engagement on Facebook during COVID-19: Simplistic Computational Data Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-15, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Soojong Kim, 2019. "Directionality of information flow and echoes without chambers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-22, May.
    2. Yuho Chung & Yiwei Li & Jianmin Jia, 2021. "Exploring embeddedness, centrality, and social influence on backer behavior: the role of backer networks in crowdfunding," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(5), pages 925-946, September.
    3. Patrizia Fanasch, 2019. "Survival of the fittest: The impact of eco‐certification and reputation on firm performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(4), pages 611-628, May.
    4. Jan Hk{a}z{l}a & Yan Jin & Elchanan Mossel & Govind Ramnarayan, 2019. "A Geometric Model of Opinion Polarization," Papers 1910.05274, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2021.
    5. Gil Appel & Lauren Grewal & Rhonda Hadi & Andrew T. Stephen, 2020. "The future of social media in marketing," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 79-95, January.
    6. Pyo, Tae-Hyung & Tamrakar, Chanchal & Lee, Jae Young & Choi, Yun Seob, 2023. "Is social capital always “Capital”?: Measuring and leveraging social capital in online user communities for in-group diffusion," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    7. Che, X. & Katayama, H. & Lee, P., 2020. "Willingness to Pay for Brand Reputation: Lessons from the Volkswagen Diesel Emissions Scandal," Working Papers 20/02, Department of Economics, City University London.
    8. Abhishek Samantray & Paolo Pin, 2019. "Credibility of climate change denial in social media," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-8, December.
    9. Marco A Janssen & Allen Lee & Hari Sundaram, 2016. "Stimulating Contributions to Public Goods through Information Feedback: Some Experimental Results," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, July.
    10. Nadav Rakocz & Sindhu Ernala & Israel Nir & Udi Weinsberg & Amit Bahl, 2023. "The heterogeneous effects of social support on the adoption of Facebook’s vaccine profile frames feature," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    11. Ventura, Vera & Iacus, Stefano & Ceron, Andrea & Curini, Luigi & Frisio, Dario, 2016. "Expo Milano 2015: Legacies in Tweets," 2016 International European Forum (151st EAAE Seminar), February 15-19, 2016, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 244534, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    12. Irz, Xavier & Mazzocchi, Mario & Réquillart, Vincent & Soler, Louis-Georges, 2015. "Research in Food Economics: past trends and new challenges," Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, Editions NecPlus, vol. 96(01), pages 187-237, March.
    13. Liu, Jian-Guo & Li, Ren-De & Guo, Qiang & Zhang, Yi-Cheng, 2018. "Collective iteration behavior for online social networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 499(C), pages 490-497.
    14. Thomas Fujiwara & Karsten Müller & Carlo Schwarz, 2021. "The Effect of Social Media on Elections: Evidence from the United States," NBER Working Papers 28849, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Platania, Marco & Spadoni, Roberta, 2018. "How People Share Information about Food: Insights from Tweets Regarding two Italian Regions," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 9(2), March.
    16. Pérez-Martínez, H. & Bauzá Mingueza, F. & Soriano-Paños, D. & Gómez-Gardeñes, J. & Floría, L.M., 2023. "Polarized opinion states in static networks driven by limited information horizons," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 175(P1).
    17. Michele Coscia & Luca Rossi, 2022. "How minimizing conflicts could lead to polarization on social media: An agent-based model investigation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-23, January.
    18. Shan Huang & Sinan Aral & Yu Jeffrey Hu & Erik Brynjolfsson, 2020. "Social Advertising Effectiveness Across Products: A Large-Scale Field Experiment," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(6), pages 1142-1165, November.
    19. Yeomans, Michael & Minson, Julia & Collins, Hanne & Chen, Frances & Gino, Francesca, 2020. "Conversational receptiveness: Improving engagement with opposing views," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 131-148.
    20. Hui Zhu & Fumin Deng, 2020. "How to Influence Rural Tourism Intention by Risk Knowledge during COVID-19 Containment in China: Mediating Role of Risk Perception and Attitude," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-23, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:105:y:2021:i:c:s0306919221001263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/foodpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.