IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0333922.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public discourses of alternative protein foods in Facebook public pages’ posts, 2014–2024

Author

Listed:
  • Weiyu Zhang
  • Bingyan Wang
  • Jingyi Xie
  • Lai Peng Leong
  • Tai Wei David Leong
  • Max Jing Rui Tham
  • Wee Han Ang

Abstract

“Alternative protein” (AP) refers to protein sources that are different from conventional animal-based proteins. This category encompasses a variety of highly processed plant-based proteins, cultured or cell-based meat, and is primarily driven by factors like sustainability, health, ethical concerns about animal welfare, and the need to feed a growing global population. The aim of this study is to map and understand public discourses around AP foods through social monitoring, in particular, computational analyses of social media big data. Through analyzing the topics and sentiments of Facebook public pages’ English content in the decade of 2014–2024, we found that (1) public attention on plant-based AP foods dropped since 2021, while attention on cell-based AP foods showed an uneven growth; (2) public sentiments towards plant-based AP foods were consistently positive, while sentiments towards cell-based AP foods were clearly more mixed; (3) discussion topics under plant-based AP foods were more practical and diverse than topics under cell-based AP foods; (4) the leading actors talking about AP foods were enterprises & industry, media, and organizations. Overall, plant-based AP foods have generated a more established and diverse public discourse, while cell-based AP foods are still emerging in public conversations and continue to face greater barriers to widespread understanding and acceptance.

Suggested Citation

  • Weiyu Zhang & Bingyan Wang & Jingyi Xie & Lai Peng Leong & Tai Wei David Leong & Max Jing Rui Tham & Wee Han Ang, 2025. "Public discourses of alternative protein foods in Facebook public pages’ posts, 2014–2024," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(10), pages 1-14, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0333922
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0333922
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0333922
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0333922&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0333922?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Delmastro, Marco & Zollo, Fabiana, 2021. "Viewpoint: Social monitoring for food policy and research: Directions and implications," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Caroll Hermann & Melanie Govender, 2022. "eHealth Engagement on Facebook during COVID-19: Simplistic Computational Data Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Enock Siankwilimba & Chisoni Mumba & Bernard Mudenda Hang’ombe & Joshua Munkombwe & Jacqueline Hiddlestone-Mumford & Munyaradzi A. Dzvimbo & Md Enamul Hoque, 2024. "Bioecosystems towards sustainable agricultural extension delivery: effects of various factors," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(9), pages 21801-21843, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0333922. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.