IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v206y2026ics0148296325007799.html

Synergistic effect and differential effect: The impact of managerial outcome and process feedback fairness on continuous user innovation in innovation communities

Author

Listed:
  • Pan, Zhao
  • Yang, Yonghong
  • Shi, Zujun
  • Chen, Kehang
  • Yang, Dongshan

Abstract

This study examines the synergistic and differential effects of managerial feedback fairness in open innovation communities, where users easily compare outcome and process feedback from managers. Drawing on relevant literature, we investigate how outcome and process feedback fairness interact with each other and with peer recognition to impact user innovation. Through a mixed-methods design, combining qualitative interviews and quantitative study of 135,822 ideas from 22,925 Xiaomi community users, we reveal: (1) both fairness types positively impact continuous user innovation; (2) these fairness types exhibit two distinct synergistic effects, emphasizing the importance of a balance; and (3) with increased peer recognition, outcome feedback fairness’s impact strengthens while process feedback fairness’s impact weakens. Our research contributes by introducing a new framework for understanding managerial feedback fairness, empirically demonstrating its synergistic and differential effects. These findings underscore the critical role of balanced feedback fairness in sustaining innovation communities and guiding effective management strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Pan, Zhao & Yang, Yonghong & Shi, Zujun & Chen, Kehang & Yang, Dongshan, 2026. "Synergistic effect and differential effect: The impact of managerial outcome and process feedback fairness on continuous user innovation in innovation communities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:206:y:2026:i:c:s0148296325007799
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115956
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325007799
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115956?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:206:y:2026:i:c:s0148296325007799. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.