IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v206y2026ics0148296325007799.html

Synergistic effect and differential effect: The impact of managerial outcome and process feedback fairness on continuous user innovation in innovation communities

Author

Listed:
  • Pan, Zhao
  • Yang, Yonghong
  • Shi, Zujun
  • Chen, Kehang
  • Yang, Dongshan

Abstract

This study examines the synergistic and differential effects of managerial feedback fairness in open innovation communities, where users easily compare outcome and process feedback from managers. Drawing on relevant literature, we investigate how outcome and process feedback fairness interact with each other and with peer recognition to impact user innovation. Through a mixed-methods design, combining qualitative interviews and quantitative study of 135,822 ideas from 22,925 Xiaomi community users, we reveal: (1) both fairness types positively impact continuous user innovation; (2) these fairness types exhibit two distinct synergistic effects, emphasizing the importance of a balance; and (3) with increased peer recognition, outcome feedback fairness’s impact strengthens while process feedback fairness’s impact weakens. Our research contributes by introducing a new framework for understanding managerial feedback fairness, empirically demonstrating its synergistic and differential effects. These findings underscore the critical role of balanced feedback fairness in sustaining innovation communities and guiding effective management strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Pan, Zhao & Yang, Yonghong & Shi, Zujun & Chen, Kehang & Yang, Dongshan, 2026. "Synergistic effect and differential effect: The impact of managerial outcome and process feedback fairness on continuous user innovation in innovation communities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:206:y:2026:i:c:s0148296325007799
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115956
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325007799
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115956?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Behnaz Bojd & Xiaolong Song & Yong Tan & Xiangbin Yan, 2022. "Gamified Challenges in Online Weight-Loss Communities," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 718-736, June.
    2. Min Qin & Shuqin Li & Fangtong Cai & Wei Zhu & Shanshan Qiu, 2023. "Where are your ideas going? Idea adoption in online user innovation communities," European Journal of Innovation Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 27(6), pages 2122-2148, March.
    3. Pallab Sanyal & Shun Ye, 2024. "An Examination of the Dynamics of Crowdsourcing Contests: Role of Feedback Type," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 394-413, March.
    4. Ogink, Timko & Dong, John Qi, 2019. "Stimulating innovation by user feedback on social media: The case of an online user innovation community," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 295-302.
    5. Yan Chen & F. Maxwell Harper & Joseph Konstan & Sherry Xin Li, 2010. "Social Comparisons and Contributions to Online Communities: A Field Experiment on MovieLens," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(4), pages 1358-1398, September.
    6. Gebauer, Johannes & Füller, Johann & Pezzei, Roland, 2013. "The dark and the bright side of co-creation: Triggers of member behavior in online innovation communities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1516-1527.
    7. Eugene Kim & Choong C. Lee & Jaeyoung An, 2024. "Examining how online store managers’ responses to negative reviews affect potential shoppers," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 863-900, June.
    8. Zi-Lin He & Poh-Kam Wong, 2004. "Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 481-494, August.
    9. Chou, En-Yi & Lin, Cheng-Yu & Huang, Heng-Chiang, 2016. "Fairness and devotion go far: Integrating online justice and value co-creation in virtual communities," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 60-72.
    10. Sparks, Beverley A. & So, Kevin Kam Fung & Bradley, Graham L., 2016. "Responding to negative online reviews: The effects of hotel responses on customer inferences of trust and concern," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 74-85.
    11. Han, Xintong & Li, Yushen & Wang, Tong, 2023. "Peer recognition, badge policies, and content contribution: An empirical study," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 691-707.
    12. Min Qin & Su Liang, 2019. "User recognition mechanism and user contribution behavior in enterprise-hosted online product innovation communities," Nankai Business Review International, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(1), pages 17-41, January.
    13. Swanand J. Deodhar & Samrat Gupta, 2023. "The Impact of Social Reputation Features in Innovation Tournaments: Evidence from a Natural Experiment," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 178-193, March.
    14. Yang, Mu & Han, Chunjia, 2021. "Stimulating innovation: Managing peer interaction for idea generation on digital innovation platforms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 456-465.
    15. Christoph Riedl & Victor P. Seidel, 2018. "Learning from Mixed Signals in Online Innovation Communities," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(6), pages 1010-1032, December.
    16. Aidin Namin & Rambod Dargahi & Andrew J. Rohm, 2024. "The role of feedback source and valence in crowdsourced idea innovation," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(3), pages 458-474, February.
    17. Ling Jiang & Christian Wagner, 2015. "Perceptions of justice or injustice as determinants of contributor defections from online communities," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 66(7), pages 1477-1493, July.
    18. Kimmy Wa Chan & Stella Yiyan Li & Jian Ni & John JianJun Zhu, 2021. "What Feedback Matters? The Role of Experience in Motivating Crowdsourcing Innovation," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(1), pages 103-126, January.
    19. Fuller, Johann & Jawecki, Gregor & Muhlbacher, Hans, 2007. "Innovation creation by online basketball communities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 60-71, January.
    20. Lin, Jie & Wang, Chao & Zhou, Lixin & Jiang, Xiaoyan, 2022. "Converting consumer-generated content into an innovation resource: A user ideas processing framework in online user innovation communities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    21. Wang, Xia & Yu, Chunling & Wei, Yujie, 2012. "Social Media Peer Communication and Impacts on Purchase Intentions: A Consumer Socialization Framework," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 198-208.
    22. Liao, Junyun & Chen, Jiawen & Mou, Jian, 2021. "Examining the antecedents of idea contribution in online innovation communities: A perspective of creative self-efficacy," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    23. Qian Liu & Zhengfa Yang & Xiaofang Cai & Qianzhou Du & Weiguo Fan, 2022. "The more, the better? The effect of feedback and user's past successes on idea implementation in open innovation communities," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(3), pages 376-392, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Na & Zhao, Yuxiang Chris & Zhang, Jundong & Yan, Ying & Huang, Qi, 2025. "Exploring idea selection in open innovation communities: A stochastic cusp catastrophe model perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    2. Tat Koon Koh, 2025. "“Optimal” Feedback Use in Crowdsourcing Contests: Source Effect and Priming Intervention," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(4), pages 1489-1508, July.
    3. Morana Fudurić & Andreina Mandelli, 2017. "Corporate and Non-Profit Social Media Policies: A Content Analysis," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 29(1), pages 7-22.
    4. Đurđana Ozretić Došen, 2017. "Editorial preface," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 29(1), pages 5-6.
    5. Christoph Riedl & Tom Grad & Christopher Lettl, 2024. "Competition and Collaboration in Crowdsourcing Communities: What happens when peers evaluate each other?," Papers 2404.14141, arXiv.org.
    6. Pescher, Christian & Tellis, Gerard J. & Füller, Johann, 2025. "Ideators’ success in innovation tournaments: Participation, productivity, or pressure?," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 335-364.
    7. Oh, Ga-Eun (Grace) & Aliyev, Murod & Kafouros, Mario & Au, Alan Kai Ming, 2022. "The role of consumer characteristics in explaining product innovation performance: Evidence from emerging economies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 713-727.
    8. Grant, Annetta & Weijo, Henri & Dacin, Peter A., 2023. "How institutional logics shape fairness in crowdsourcing: The case of Threadless," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 378-397.
    9. Hsieh, Sara H. & Chang, Aihwa, 2016. "The Psychological Mechanism of Brand Co-creation Engagement," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 13-26.
    10. Qi Yao & Jianjian Du & Zhijie Zhou, 2025. "Impact of Internet Community, Consumer Creativity, Enterprise Utilization, and Exploratory Dynamic Equilibrium on Product Innovation Performance," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(1), pages 2119-2146, March.
    11. Schweitzer, Fiona & Mai, Robert, 2022. "Does one rotten apple always spoil the barrel? The role of perceptions of empowerment when consumers observe destructive others in online co-creation activities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 436-446.
    12. Liu, Jialing & Wei, Jiang & Liu, Yang & Jin, Duo, 2022. "How to channel knowledge coproduction behavior in an online community: Combining machine learning and narrative analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    13. Yang, Mu & Ooi, Yat Ming & Han, Chunjia, 2022. "Lead users as idea supplier in online community platform: How to choose the right ideas to implement?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    14. Shi, Xiaoxiao & Evans, Richard & Shan, Wei, 2022. "Solver engagement in online crowdsourcing communities: The roles of perceived interactivity, relationship quality and psychological ownership," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    15. Kick, Markus, 2015. "Social Media Research: A Narrative Review," EconStor Preprints 182506, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    16. Berthinier-Poncet, Anne & Dubouloz, Sandra & Ruiz, Émilie & Thévenard-Puthod, Catherine, 2023. "Innovation communities' contributions throughout firms’ innovation processes: An outdoor sports industry case study," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 575-589.
    17. Ren, Jie & Han, Yue & Genc, Yegin & Yeoh, William & Popovič, Aleš, 2021. "The boundary of crowdsourcing in the domain of creativity✰," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    18. Merz, Michael A. & Zarantonello, Lia & Grappi, Silvia, 2018. "How valuable are your customers in the brand value co-creation process? The development of a Customer Co-Creation Value (CCCV) scale," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 79-89.
    19. Dineva, Denitsa & Breitsohl, Jan & Garrod, Brian & Megicks, Philip, 2020. "Consumer Responses to Conflict-Management Strategies on Non-Profit Social Media Fan Pages," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 118-136.
    20. Mattarelli, Elisa & Schecter, Aaron & Hinds, Pamela & Contractor, Noshir, 2025. "Secondhand social capital and idea quality in open innovation communities," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(10).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:206:y:2026:i:c:s0148296325007799. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.