IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ijrema/v40y2023i2p378-397.html

How institutional logics shape fairness in crowdsourcing: The case of Threadless

Author

Listed:
  • Grant, Annetta
  • Weijo, Henri
  • Dacin, Peter A.

Abstract

Fairness is essential for successful crowdsourcing. Without it, companies run the risk of consumers not participating, or worse, sabotaging the crowdsourcing initiative. Yet little is known about how consumers determine what is fair in crowdsourcing. Building on theories of organizational justice and institutional logics, and using a longitudinal netnography of Threadless, a popular crowdsourcing platform, this paper shows how experiences of fairness stem from the interaction between two conflicting crowdsourcing logics: the logic of renewal and the logic of community. The two logics inform notions of fairness in crowdsourcing contests across procedural, distributive, and interactional justice dimensions. A balance between the two logics is ideal for maintaining fairness among a crowdsourcing community. We show the conditions in which crowdsourcing participants tolerate transgressions to each justice dimension, consequently emphasizing one logic over the other. Overall, our study advances theory on crowdsourcing logics and how they guide notions of procedural, distributive, and interactional fairness in crowdsourcing. Our study also offers new guidance on how to manage fairness in crowdsourcing.

Suggested Citation

  • Grant, Annetta & Weijo, Henri & Dacin, Peter A., 2023. "How institutional logics shape fairness in crowdsourcing: The case of Threadless," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 378-397.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ijrema:v:40:y:2023:i:2:p:378-397
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2022.10.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167811622000714
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2022.10.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nishikawa, Hidehiko & Schreier, Martin & Ogawa, Susumu, 2013. "User-generated versus designer-generated products: A performance assessment at Muji," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 160-167.
    2. Vargo, Stephen L. & Lusch, Robert F., 2017. "Service-dominant logic 2025," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 46-67.
    3. Spiggle, Susan, 1994. "Analysis and Interpretation of Qualitative Data in Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(3), pages 491-503, December.
    4. Gebauer, Johannes & Füller, Johann & Pezzei, Roland, 2013. "The dark and the bright side of co-creation: Triggers of member behavior in online innovation communities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1516-1527.
    5. Kannan, P.K. & Li, Hongshuang “Alice”, 2017. "Digital marketing: A framework, review and research agenda," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 22-45.
    6. Weijo, Henri & Bean, Jonathan & Rintamäki, Jukka, 2019. "Brand community coping," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 128-136.
    7. Ramaswamy, Venkat & Ozcan, Kerimcan, 2016. "Brand value co-creation in a digitalized world: An integrative framework and research implications," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 93-106.
    8. Chou, En-Yi & Lin, Cheng-Yu & Huang, Heng-Chiang, 2016. "Fairness and devotion go far: Integrating online justice and value co-creation in virtual communities," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 60-72.
    9. Darren W. Dahl & Christoph Fuchs & Martin Schreier, 2015. "Why and When Consumers Prefer Products of User-Driven Firms: A Social Identification Account," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(8), pages 1978-1988, August.
    10. Julia Bauer & Nikolaus Franke & Philipp Tuertscher, 2016. "Intellectual Property Norms in Online Communities: How User-Organized Intellectual Property Regulation Supports Innovation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 724-750, December.
    11. Lars Bo Jeppesen & Lars Frederiksen, 2006. "Why Do Users Contribute to Firm-Hosted User Communities? The Case of Computer-Controlled Music Instruments," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 45-63, February.
    12. Johanna F. Gollnhofer & Katharina Hellwig & Felicitas Morhart, 2016. "Fair Is Good, but What Is Fair? Negotiations of Distributive Justice in an Emerging Nonmonetary Sharing Model," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(2), pages 226-245.
    13. Gry Høngsmark Knudsen & Yun Mi Antorini, 2021. "Hard Work: Unanticipated Collaboration in Co-creation Processes," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 6(4), pages 435-446.
    14. Andrea C. Morales, 2005. "Giving Firms an "E" for Effort: Consumer Responses to High-Effort Firms," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 31(4), pages 806-812, March.
    15. Fournier, Susan & Avery, Jill, 2011. "The uninvited brand," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 193-207, May.
    16. Barry L. Bayus, 2013. "Crowdsourcing New Product Ideas over Time: An Analysis of the Dell IdeaStorm Community," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(1), pages 226-244, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Preece, Chloe & Kerrigan, Finola & O’Reilly, Daragh, 2025. "Theorizing regressive nostalgia: Understanding exclusionary consumers as a brand threat," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 411-432.
    2. Debenedetti, Alain & Philippe, Déborah & Dion, Delphine, 2025. "Balancing exclusivity and inclusivity through the strategic domestication of the luxury retail experience," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 32-54.
    3. Pescher, Christian & Tellis, Gerard J. & Füller, Johann, 2025. "Ideators’ success in innovation tournaments: Participation, productivity, or pressure?," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 335-364.
    4. Alain Debenedetti & Déborah Philippe & Delphine Dion, 2025. "Balancing exclusivity and inclusivity through the strategic domestication of the luxury retail experience," Post-Print hal-04593576, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pollok, Patrick & Amft, André & Diener, Kathleen & Lüttgens, Dirk & Piller, Frank T., 2021. "Knowledge diversity and team creativity: How hobbyists beat professional designers in creating novel board games," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(8).
    2. Cambier, Fanny & Poncin, Ingrid, 2020. "Inferring brand integrity from marketing communications: The effects of brand transparency signals in a consumer empowerment context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 260-270.
    3. Pescher, Christian & Tellis, Gerard J. & Füller, Johann, 2025. "Ideators’ success in innovation tournaments: Participation, productivity, or pressure?," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 335-364.
    4. repec:eee:respol:v:48:y:2019:i:8:p:- is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Alfonso Gambardella & Christina Raasch & Eric von Hippel, 2017. "The User Innovation Paradigm: Impacts on Markets and Welfare," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(5), pages 1450-1468, May.
    6. Donthu, Naveen & Reinartz, Werner & Kumar, Satish & Pattnaik, Debidutta, 2021. "A retrospective review of the first 35 years of the International Journal of Research in Marketing," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 232-269.
    7. Yang, Mu & Ooi, Yat Ming & Han, Chunjia, 2022. "Lead users as idea supplier in online community platform: How to choose the right ideas to implement?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    8. Elina H. Hwang & Param Vir Singh & Linda Argote, 2019. "Jack of All, Master of Some: Information Network and Innovation in Crowdsourcing Communities," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(2), pages 389-410, June.
    9. Renton, Michelle & Richard, James E., 2020. "Entrepreneurship in marketing: Socializing partners for brand governance in EM firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 180-188.
    10. Jiao, Yuanyuan & Wu, Yepeng & Lu, Steven, 2021. "The role of crowdsourcing in product design: The moderating effect of user expertise and network connectivity," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    11. Salgado, Stéphane & Hemonnet-Goujot, Aurelie & Henard, David H. & de Barnier, Virginie, 2020. "The dynamics of innovation contest experience: An integrated framework from the customer’s perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 29-43.
    12. Ryu, Sann & Park, JungKun, 2020. "The effects of benefit-driven commitment on usage of social media for shopping and positive word-of-mouth," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    13. Hollebeek, Linda D. & Belk, Russell, 2021. "Consumers’ technology-facilitated brand engagement and wellbeing: Positivist TAM/PERMA- vs. Consumer Culture Theory perspectives," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 387-401.
    14. Gielens, Katrijn & Steenkamp, Jan-Benedict E.M., 2019. "Branding in the era of digital (dis)intermediation," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 367-384.
    15. Imran Bashir Dar & Muhammad Bashir Khan & Abdul Zahid Khan & Bahaudin G. Mujtaba, 2021. "A qualitative analysis of the marketing analytics literature: where would ethical issues and legality rank?," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(3), pages 242-261, September.
    16. Kimmy Wa Chan & Stella Yiyan Li & Jian Ni & John JianJun Zhu, 2021. "What Feedback Matters? The Role of Experience in Motivating Crowdsourcing Innovation," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(1), pages 103-126, January.
    17. Wang Kai & Tao Yu & Wang Hui, 2017. "Combining Ideas in Crowdsourced Idea Generation," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 9(1), pages 203-212, February.
    18. Dongmei Han & Zhiliang Pang & Lifeng He & Xiaohang Zhou & Shaohua Zhang, 2023. "Management response and user idea generation: evidence from an online open innovation community," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 381-400, December.
    19. repec:wsi:acsxxx:v:21:y:2019:i:08:n:s1363919619500142 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Broekhuizen, T.L.J. & Emrich, O. & Gijsenberg, M.J. & Broekhuis, M. & Donkers, B. & Sloot, L.M., 2021. "Digital platform openness: Drivers, dimensions and outcomes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 902-914.
    21. Piepponen, Amanda & Ritala, Paavo & Keränen, Joona & Maijanen, Päivi, 2022. "Digital transformation of the value proposition: A single case study in the media industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 311-325.
    22. Jones, Scott & Cronin, James & Piacentini, Maria G., 2022. "Celebrity brand break-up: Fan experiences of para-loveshock," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 720-731.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ijrema:v:40:y:2023:i:2:p:378-397. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-research-in-marketing/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.