IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v212y2025ics0040162525000150.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring idea selection in open innovation communities: A stochastic cusp catastrophe model perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Na
  • Zhao, Yuxiang Chris
  • Zhang, Jundong
  • Yan, Ying
  • Huang, Qi

Abstract

With the spread of crowdsourcing models, open innovation communities are able to collect ideas quickly, but it is still a major challenge to select high-quality ideas from a large number of user contributions. Adopting a nonlinear and complex perspective, this study employs a stochastic cusp catastrophe model to shed light on idea selection. We utilised a unique dataset from 12 years of LEGO IDEAS to track the idea selection process over a six-month period at weekly intervals. First, we applied machine learning methods to identify three key factors influencing idea selection: “view,” “comment,” and “update.” Then, we performed a coordinate transformation based on the equilibrium surface in the cusp catastrophe model to build an idea selected catastrophe model. This model illustrates that idea selection in open innovation communities exhibits discontinuous catastrophe. Through catastrophe analysis, we categorized ideas into four types, each with distinct managerial value, highlighting the importance of focusing on “promising ideas” near the selection threshold. Furthermore, adjusting control variables along feasible paths can make previously unselected ideas into selected ones, facilitating the identification of high-quality ideas. Our research contributes to the existing literature on idea selection in open innovation communities, and provides practical insights for innovation managers.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Na & Zhao, Yuxiang Chris & Zhang, Jundong & Yan, Ying & Huang, Qi, 2025. "Exploring idea selection in open innovation communities: A stochastic cusp catastrophe model perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:212:y:2025:i:c:s0040162525000150
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2025.123984
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162525000150
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2025.123984?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:212:y:2025:i:c:s0040162525000150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.