IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v193y2025ics0148296325001493.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tokenomics: Challenges for All-Female Founding teams in accelerator cohorts

Author

Listed:
  • Kwapisz, Agnieszka
  • Hechavarria, Diana M.

Abstract

Prior research attributes gender disparities in venture capital to investor bias and gendered evaluation criteria, yet these studies do not explain why accelerators—designed to reduce such biases—yield mixed results for all-female teams. We identify an overlooked factor: accelerator cohort gender composition. Using data from the Global Accelerator Learning Initiative (GALI), we examine how the proportion of all-female teams within an accelerator affects post-acceleration funding outcomes. Drawing on tokenism theory, we show that higher proportions of all-female teams exacerbate rather than mitigate funding disadvantages through visibility, contrast, and assimilation mechanisms. As the share of all-female teams increases, these teams experience heightened scrutiny, isolation from investor networks, and pressure to conform to stereotypes, further restricting access to equity, philanthropic contributions, and new debt. These findings challenge the assumption that increasing women’s representation improves funding outcomes and highlight the need for accelerator redesign to foster equity.

Suggested Citation

  • Kwapisz, Agnieszka & Hechavarria, Diana M., 2025. "Tokenomics: Challenges for All-Female Founding teams in accelerator cohorts," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:193:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325001493
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115326
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325001493
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115326?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:193:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325001493. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.