IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v170y2024ics0148296323007063.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Entrepreneurial Orientation, political Ties, and corporate Reputation: The moderating roles of institutional environments

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Aiqing
  • Shu, Chengli
  • Xiao, Zhenxin

Abstract

In emerging markets, corporate reputation are important assets contributing to a firm’s competitive advantage. When building corporate reputation, emerging market firms (EMFs) must usually address interests related to the market and the government, which requires EMFs to embrace an entrepreneurial orientation (EO) and establish political ties (PTs). However, as EO follows a market logic while PTs follow a state logic, tensions between different institutional logics may occur and damage corporate reputation. This study examines how EO and PTs together influence corporate reputation and considers government intervention and religious intensity as boundary conditions. Empirical results of an analysis of survey data and secondary data reveal that EO and PTs together are negatively associated with corporate reputation, and this negative relationship is strengthened by government intervention but weakened by religious intensity. The research findings have significant implications for research and practice related to corporate reputation building in emerging markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Aiqing & Shu, Chengli & Xiao, Zhenxin, 2024. "Entrepreneurial Orientation, political Ties, and corporate Reputation: The moderating roles of institutional environments," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:170:y:2024:i:c:s0148296323007063
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114347
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296323007063
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114347?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:170:y:2024:i:c:s0148296323007063. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.