IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v153y2022icp185-197.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effectiveness of product recommendation framing on online retail platforms

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Junhui
  • Balaji, M.S.
  • Luo, Jun
  • Jha, Subhash

Abstract

Online retailers often display product recommendations using recommendation framing or signage. Recommendation framing—such as customers who viewed this also viewed or compared similar items—reflects user- or product-related inputs used by the algorithmic product recommender system to identify products for a target customer. The current study examined the effectiveness of norm-based recommendation framing and comparison-based recommendation framing on customers’ click-through intention of the products recommended by online retailers. Four studies were conducted to test the proposed hypotheses. Findings revealed that norm-based recommendation framing is more effective than comparison-based recommendation framing and that the perceived value of the recommendations is the underlying mechanism engendering this result. Furthermore, we observed that the effectiveness of norm-based recommendation framing was only apparent when fewer products were recommended and when the recommended products were highly substitutable for the focal product. Theoretical and managerial implications are discussed regarding online retailers’ efforts to manage improved recommendation-framing strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Junhui & Balaji, M.S. & Luo, Jun & Jha, Subhash, 2022. "Effectiveness of product recommendation framing on online retail platforms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 185-197.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:153:y:2022:i:c:p:185-197
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.08.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296322006889
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.08.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wu, Linwan, 2019. "Website interactivity may compensate for consumers’ reduced control in E-Commerce," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 253-266.
    2. Jacoby, Jacob & Speller, Donald E & Berning, Carol A Kohn, 1974. "Brand Choice Behavior as a Function of Information Load: Replication and Extension," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 1(1), pages 33-42, June.
    3. Nasiri, Mohammad Sadegh & Shokouhyar, Sajjad, 2021. "Actual consumers' response to purchase refurbished smartphones: Exploring perceived value from product reviews in online retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    4. Feifei Huang & Vincent Chi Wong & Echo Wen Wan & Pankaj Aggarwal & Vicki G Morwitz & Margaret C Campbell, 2020. "The Influence of Product Anthropomorphism on Comparative Judgment [Is That Car Smiling at Me? Schema Congruity as a Basis for Evaluating Anthropomorphized Products]," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 46(5), pages 936-955.
    5. Dokyun Lee & Kartik Hosanagar, 2019. "How Do Recommender Systems Affect Sales Diversity? A Cross-Category Investigation via Randomized Field Experiment," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(1), pages 239-259, March.
    6. John T. Gourville & Dilip Soman, 2005. "Overchoice and Assortment Type: When and Why Variety Backfires," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 382-395, July.
    7. Aner Sela & Jonah Berger & Wendy Liu, 2009. "Variety, Vice, and Virtue: How Assortment Size Influences Option Choice," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 35(6), pages 941-951, April.
    8. Aguirre, Elizabeth & Mahr, Dominik & Grewal, Dhruv & de Ruyter, Ko & Wetzels, Martin, 2015. "Unraveling the Personalization Paradox: The Effect of Information Collection and Trust-Building Strategies on Online Advertisement Effectiveness," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 34-49.
    9. Mathmann, Frank & Chylinski, Mathew & de Ruyter, Ko & Higgins, E. Tory, 2017. "When Plentiful Platforms Pay Off: Assessment Orientation Moderates the Effect of Assortment Size on Choice Engagement and Product Valuation," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 93(2), pages 212-227.
    10. Tian, Kelly Tepper & Bearden, William O & Hunter, Gary L, 2001. "Consumer's Need for Uniqueness: Scale Development and Validation," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 28(1), pages 50-66, June.
    11. Kwon, Hyorkjin & Ha, Sejin & Im, Hyunjoo, 2016. "The impact of perceived similarity to other customers on shopping mall satisfaction," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 304-309.
    12. Scholz, Michael & Dorner, Verena & Schryen, Guido & Benlian, Alexander, 2017. "A configuration-based recommender system for supporting e-commerce decisions," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 83360, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    13. Landsman, Vardit & Nitzan, Irit, 2020. "Cross-decision social effects in product adoption and defection decisions," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 213-235.
    14. Marchand, André & Marx, Paul, 2020. "Automated Product Recommendations with Preference-Based Explanations," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 96(3), pages 328-343.
    15. Dou, Xinhua & Zhu, Xiajing & Zhang, Jason Q. & Wang, Jie, 2019. "Outcomes of entrepreneurship education in China: A customer experience management perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 338-347.
    16. Wu, Laurie & Lee, Christopher, 2016. "Limited Edition for Me and Best Seller for You: The Impact of Scarcity versus Popularity Cues on Self versus Other-Purchase Behavior," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 92(4), pages 486-499.
    17. Walsh, Gianfranco & Shiu, Edward & Hassan, Louise M., 2014. "Replicating, validating, and reducing the length of the consumer perceived value scale," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 260-267.
    18. Kim, Kawon & Baker, Melissa A., 2020. "Paying it forward: The influence of other customer service recovery on future co-creation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 604-615.
    19. Lusi Li & Jianqing Chen & Srinivasan Raghunathan, 2018. "Recommender System Rethink: Implications for an Electronic Marketplace with Competing Manufacturers," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 1003-1023, December.
    20. Chinchanachokchai, Sydney & Thontirawong, Pipat & Chinchanachokchai, Punjaporn, 2021. "A tale of two recommender systems: The moderating role of consumer expertise on artificial intelligence based product recommendations," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    21. Scholz, Michael & Dorner, Verena & Schryen, Guido & Benlian, Alexander, 2017. "A configuration-based recommender system for supporting e-commerce decisions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(1), pages 205-215.
    22. Scholz, Michael & Dorner, Verena & Schryen, Guido & Benlian, Alexander, 2017. "A configuration-based recommender system for supporting e-commerce decisions," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 85453, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    23. Gerald Häubl & Valerie Trifts, 2000. "Consumer Decision Making in Online Shopping Environments: The Effects of Interactive Decision Aids," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 4-21, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guo, Wenhao & Tian, Jin & Li, Minqiang, 2023. "Price-aware enhanced dynamic recommendation based on deep learning," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    2. Suyuan Luo & Tsan‐Ming Choi, 2022. "E‐commerce supply chains with considerations of cyber‐security: Should governments play a role?," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(5), pages 2107-2126, May.
    3. Park, YoungSoo & Sim, Jeongeun & Kim, Bosung, 2022. "Online retail operations with “Try-Before-You-Buy”," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(3), pages 987-1002.
    4. Davazdahemami, Behrooz & Kalgotra, Pankush & Zolbanin, Hamed M. & Delen, Dursun, 2023. "A developer-oriented recommender model for the app store: A predictive network analytics approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    5. Zhiting Song & Yanming Sun & Jiafu Wan & Lingli Huang & Jianhua Zhu, 2019. "Smart e-commerce systems: current status and research challenges," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 29(2), pages 221-238, June.
    6. Liu, Hui-hui & Song, Yao-yao & Yang, Guo-liang, 2019. "Cross-efficiency evaluation in data envelopment analysis based on prospect theory," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(1), pages 364-375.
    7. Bernd Heinrich & Marcus Hopf & Daniel Lohninger & Alexander Schiller & Michael Szubartowicz, 2022. "Something’s Missing? A Procedure for Extending Item Content Data Sets in the Context of Recommender Systems," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 267-286, February.
    8. Gupta, Mukul & Kumar, Pradeep, 2020. "Recommendation generation using personalized weight of meta-paths in heterogeneous information networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(2), pages 660-674.
    9. K. Coussement & K. W. Bock & S. Geuens, 2022. "A decision-analytic framework for interpretable recommendation systems with multiple input data sources: a case study for a European e-tailer," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 671-694, August.
    10. Miguel Godinho de Matos & Pedro Ferreira, 2020. "The Effect of Binge-Watching on the Subscription of Video on Demand: Results from Randomized Experiments," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 1337-1360, December.
    11. Javier F. de la Ballina & Isabel de la Ballina, 2019. "Scarcity as a Desirable Attribute of Luxury Fashion Brands in Millennial Marketing," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 31(2), pages 153-170.
    12. Stefan Hoffmann & Tom Joerß & Robert Mai & Payam Akbar, 2022. "Augmented reality-delivered product information at the point of sale: when information controllability backfires," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 743-776, July.
    13. Dörnyei, Krisztina Rita & Lunardo, Renaud, 2021. "When limited edition packages backfire: The role of emotional value, typicality and need for uniqueness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 233-243.
    14. Das, Gopal & Mukherjee, Amaradri & Smith, Ronn J., 2018. "The Perfect Fit: The Moderating Role of Selling Cues on Hedonic and Utilitarian Product Types," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 203-216.
    15. Xitong Li & Jörn Grahl & Oliver Hinz, 2022. "How Do Recommender Systems Lead to Consumer Purchases? A Causal Mediation Analysis of a Field Experiment," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 620-637, June.
    16. Christina Schamp & Mark Heitmann & Robin Katzenstein, 2019. "Consideration of ethical attributes along the consumer decision-making journey," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 328-348, March.
    17. Molaie, Mir Majid & Lee, Wonjae, 2022. "Economic corollaries of personalized recommendations," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    18. Suleyman Ozarslan & P. Erhan Eren, 2018. "MobileCDP: A mobile framework for the consumer decision process," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 803-824, August.
    19. Jun Li & Serguei Netessine, 2020. "Higher Market Thickness Reduces Matching Rate in Online Platforms: Evidence from a Quasiexperiment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(1), pages 271-289, January.
    20. Thomas Kramer & Suri Spolter-Weisfeld & Maneesh Thakkar, 2007. "The Effect of Cultural Orientation on Consumer Responses to Personalization," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 246-258, 03-04.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:153:y:2022:i:c:p:185-197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.