IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/insuma/v95y2020icp48-58.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is mortality or interest rate the most important risk in annuity models? A comparison of sensitivity analysis methods

Author

Listed:
  • Rabitti, Giovanni
  • Borgonovo, Emanuele

Abstract

Demographic and financial factors are key risk-drivers for insurance companies and pension funds. This paper proposes a systematic investigation for deepening our understanding how these risk drivers affect the annuity cost. We employ local and global sensitivity methods. For local sensitivity, we derive closed form expressions for the differential importance measures of perturbed annuities and connect them to the entropy of the annuity cost. For global sensitivity, we compare variance-based, moment-independent sensitivity measures and Shapley effects. In particular, moment-independent sensitivity measures and Shapley effects are compared for the first time in the case of dependent risk factors. Our framework encompasses and extends several previous results on the sensitivity analysis of annuity models. From a methodological viewpoint, the techniques compared in this paper can support analysts in building annuity models and in verifying the impact of risk drivers in their models. Numerical results using the U.S. 1990 and the U.K. 1990–1994 mortality tables show that the demographic factor is the most important risk source in low-interest rate contexts. However, when uncertainty on the two risk sources is taken into account, the financial factor becomes the global key-driver of risk. Also, interactions among the two factors appear quantitatively significant.

Suggested Citation

  • Rabitti, Giovanni & Borgonovo, Emanuele, 2020. "Is mortality or interest rate the most important risk in annuity models? A comparison of sensitivity analysis methods," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 48-58.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:95:y:2020:i:c:p:48-58
    DOI: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2020.09.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167668720301244
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2020.09.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karabey, Uǧur & Kleinow, Torsten & Cairns, Andrew J.G., 2014. "Factor risk quantification in annuity models," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 34-45.
    2. Sithole, Terry Z. & Haberman, Steven & Verrall, Richard J., 2000. "An investigation into parametric models for mortality projections, with applications to immediate annuitants' and life office pensioners' data," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 285-312, December.
    3. Andrea Saltelli & Stefano Tarantola & Karen Chad, 1998. "Presenting Results from Model Based Studies to Decision‐Makers: Can Sensitivity Analysis Be a Defogging Agent?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(6), pages 799-803, December.
    4. Deelstra, Griselda & Grasselli, Martino & Van Weverberg, Christopher, 2016. "The role of the dependence between mortality and interest rates when pricing Guaranteed Annuity Options," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 205-219.
    5. Yang Chang & Michael Sherris, 2018. "Longevity Risk Management and the Development of a Value-Based Longevity Index," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-20, February.
    6. Beekman, John A. & Fuelling, Clinton P., 1992. "Extra randomness in certain annuity models," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 275-287, January.
    7. Cousin, Areski & Maatouk, Hassan & Rullière, Didier, 2016. "Kriging of financial term-structures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(2), pages 631-648.
    8. Shiro Horiuchi & John Wilmoth & Scott Pletcher, 2008. "A decomposition method based on a model of continuous change," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 45(4), pages 785-801, November.
    9. Gary Parker, 1997. "Stochastic Analysis of the Interaction Between Investment and Insurance Risks," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(2), pages 55-71.
    10. Milevsky,Moshe A., 2006. "The Calculus of Retirement Income," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521842587.
    11. Van Groenendaal, Willem J. H. & Kleijnen, Jack P. C., 2002. "Deterministic versus stochastic sensitivity analysis in investment problems: An environmental case study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 8-20, August.
    12. Ermanno Pitacco, 2016. "Premiums for Long-Term Care Insurance Packages: Sensitivity with Respect to Biometric Assumptions," Risks, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-22, February.
    13. Dickson,David C. M. & Hardy,Mary R. & Waters,Howard R., 2013. "Actuarial Mathematics for Life Contingent Risks," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107044074, October.
    14. Berdin, Elia, 2016. "Interest rate risk, longevity risk and the solvency of life insurers," ICIR Working Paper Series 23/16, Goethe University Frankfurt, International Center for Insurance Regulation (ICIR).
    15. Xiaoqun Wang, 2006. "On the Effects of Dimension Reduction Techniques on Some High-Dimensional Problems in Finance," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(6), pages 1063-1078, December.
    16. Ludkovski, Mike & Risk, Jimmy & Zail, Howard, 2018. "Gaussian Process Models For Mortality Rates And Improvement Factors," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 48(3), pages 1307-1347, September.
    17. Spedicato, Giorgio Alfredo, 2013. "The lifecontingencies Package: Performing Financial and Actuarial Mathematics Calculations in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 55(i10).
    18. Noreen Goldman & Graham Lord, 1986. "A new look at entropy and the life table," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 23(2), pages 275-282, May.
    19. Pablo Antolin, 2007. "Longevity Risk and Private Pensions," Financial Market Trends, OECD Publishing, vol. 2007(1), pages 107-128.
    20. Borgonovo, E., 2010. "Sensitivity analysis with finite changes: An application to modified EOQ models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 127-138, January.
    21. Pitacco, Ermanno & Denuit, Michel & Haberman, Steven & Olivieri, Annamaria, 2009. "Modelling Longevity Dynamics for Pensions and Annuity Business," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199547272.
    22. Tietje, Olaf, 2005. "Identification of a small reliable and efficient set of consistent scenarios," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(2), pages 418-432, April.
    23. Bauer Daniel & Weber Frederik, 2008. "Assessing Investment and Longevity Risks within Immediate Annuities," Asia-Pacific Journal of Risk and Insurance, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 1-24, September.
    24. Dickson,David C. M. & Hardy,Mary R. & Waters,Howard R., 2013. "Solutions Manual for Actuarial Mathematics for Life Contingent Risks," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107620261, February.
    25. Isadora Antoniano‐Villalobos & Emanuele Borgonovo & Sumeda Siriwardena, 2018. "Which Parameters Are Important? Differential Importance Under Uncertainty," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(11), pages 2459-2477, November.
    26. Borgonovo, E., 2007. "A new uncertainty importance measure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(6), pages 771-784.
    27. E. Borgonovo & S. Tarantola & E. Plischke & M. D. Morris, 2014. "Transformations and invariance in the sensitivity analysis of computer experiments," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 76(5), pages 925-947, November.
    28. Olivieri, Annamaria, 2001. "Uncertainty in mortality projections: an actuarial perspective," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 231-245, October.
    29. Edward Frees, 1998. "Relative Importance of Risk Sources in Insurance Systems," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(2), pages 34-49.
    30. Gerstner, Thomas & Griebel, Michael & Holtz, Markus, 2009. "Efficient deterministic numerical simulation of stochastic asset-liability management models in life insurance," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 434-446, June.
    31. Borgonovo, Emanuele & Plischke, Elmar, 2016. "Sensitivity analysis: A review of recent advances," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 869-887.
    32. Haberman, Steven & Khalaf-Allah, Marwa & Verrall, Richard, 2011. "Entropy, longevity and the cost of annuities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 197-204, March.
    33. Apicella, Giovanna & Dacorogna, Michel M, 2016. "A General framework for modelling mortality to better estimate its relationship with interest rate risks," MPRA Paper 75788, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    34. Ronald L. Iman & Stephen C. Hora, 1990. "A Robust Measure of Uncertainty Importance for Use in Fault Tree System Analysis," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(3), pages 401-406, September.
    35. Xiaoming Liu, 2013. "Annuity Uncertainty with Stochastic Mortality and Interest Rates," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 136-152.
    36. Christiansen, Marcus C., 2008. "A sensitivity analysis of typical life insurance contracts with respect to the technical basis," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 787-796, April.
    37. Montserrat Guillen & Antoni Vidiella‐i‐Anguera, 2005. "Forecasting Spanish Natural Life Expectancy," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5), pages 1161-1170, October.
    38. Hári, Norbert & De Waegenaere, Anja & Melenberg, Bertrand & Nijman, Theo E., 2008. "Longevity risk in portfolios of pension annuities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 505-519, April.
    39. Ludkovski, Mike & Risk, Jimmy & Zail, Howard, 2018. "Gaussian Process Models For Mortality Rates And Improvement Factors €“ Corrigendum," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 48(3), pages 1349-1349, September.
    40. Maria Bruno & Emanuela Camerini & Alvaro Tomassetti, 2000. "Financial and Demographic Risks of a Portfolio of Life Insurance Policies with Stochastic Interest Rates," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(4), pages 44-55.
    41. Plischke, Elmar & Borgonovo, Emanuele & Smith, Curtis L., 2013. "Global sensitivity measures from given data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(3), pages 536-550.
    42. Zhao, Yixing & Mamon, Rogemar, 2018. "An efficient algorithm for the valuation of a guaranteed annuity option with correlated financial and mortality risks," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1-12.
    43. Andrea Saltelli, 2002. "Sensitivity Analysis for Importance Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3), pages 579-590, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tsai, Pei-Hsuan & Wang, Ying-Wei & Chang, Wen-Chang, 2023. "Hybrid MADM-based study of key risk factors in house-for-pension reverse mortgage lending in Taiwan's banking industry," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    2. Makam, Vaishno Devi & Millossovich, Pietro & Tsanakas, Andreas, 2021. "Sensitivity analysis with χ2-divergences," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 372-383.
    3. Tang, Qihe & Tong, Zhiwei & Yang, Yang, 2021. "Large portfolio losses in a turbulent market," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(2), pages 755-769.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Borgonovo, Emanuele & Plischke, Elmar, 2016. "Sensitivity analysis: A review of recent advances," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 869-887.
    2. Mirko Ginocchi & Ferdinanda Ponci & Antonello Monti, 2021. "Sensitivity Analysis and Power Systems: Can We Bridge the Gap? A Review and a Guide to Getting Started," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-59, December.
    3. S. Cucurachi & E. Borgonovo & R. Heijungs, 2016. "A Protocol for the Global Sensitivity Analysis of Impact Assessment Models in Life Cycle Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(2), pages 357-377, February.
    4. Plischke, Elmar & Borgonovo, Emanuele, 2019. "Copula theory and probabilistic sensitivity analysis: Is there a connection?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 1046-1059.
    5. Emanuele Borgonovo & Gordon B. Hazen & Elmar Plischke, 2016. "A Common Rationale for Global Sensitivity Measures and Their Estimation," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(10), pages 1871-1895, October.
    6. Barry Anderson & Emanuele Borgonovo & Marzio Galeotti & Roberto Roson, 2014. "Uncertainty in Climate Change Modeling: Can Global Sensitivity Analysis Be of Help?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(2), pages 271-293, February.
    7. Elmar Plischke & Emanuele Borgonovo, 2020. "Fighting the Curse of Sparsity: Probabilistic Sensitivity Measures From Cumulative Distribution Functions," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(12), pages 2639-2660, December.
    8. Tatsuya Sakurahara & Seyed Reihani & Ernie Kee & Zahra Mohaghegh, 2020. "Global importance measure methodology for integrated probabilistic risk assessment," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(2), pages 377-396, April.
    9. Yun, Wanying & Lu, Zhenzhou & Feng, Kaixuan & Li, Luyi, 2019. "An elaborate algorithm for analyzing the Borgonovo moment-independent sensitivity by replacing the probability density function estimation with the probability estimation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 99-108.
    10. Raj Kumari Bahl & Sotirios Sabanis, 2017. "General Price Bounds for Guaranteed Annuity Options," Papers 1707.00807, arXiv.org.
    11. Pesenti, Silvana M. & Millossovich, Pietro & Tsanakas, Andreas, 2019. "Reverse sensitivity testing: What does it take to break the model?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(2), pages 654-670.
    12. Derennes, Pierre & Morio, Jérôme & Simatos, Florian, 2019. "A nonparametric importance sampling estimator for moment independent importance measures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 3-16.
    13. Kucherenko, Sergei & Song, Shufang & Wang, Lu, 2019. "Quantile based global sensitivity measures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 35-48.
    14. Makam, Vaishno Devi & Millossovich, Pietro & Tsanakas, Andreas, 2021. "Sensitivity analysis with χ2-divergences," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 372-383.
    15. Stefano Cucurachi & Carlos Felipe Blanco & Bernhard Steubing & Reinout Heijungs, 2022. "Implementation of uncertainty analysis and moment‐independent global sensitivity analysis for full‐scale life cycle assessment models," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(2), pages 374-391, April.
    16. Marchioni, Andrea & Magni, Carlo Alberto, 2018. "Investment decisions and sensitivity analysis: NPV-consistency of rates of return," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(1), pages 361-372.
    17. Wenbin Ruan & Zhenzhou Lu & Pengfei Wei, 2013. "Estimation of conditional moment by moving least squares and its application for importance analysis," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 227(6), pages 641-650, December.
    18. Li, Haihe & Wang, Pan & Huang, Xiaoyu & Zhang, Zheng & Zhou, Changcong & Yue, Zhufeng, 2021. "Vine copula-based parametric sensitivity analysis of failure probability-based importance measure in the presence of multidimensional dependencies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    19. López-Benito, Alfredo & Bolado-Lavín, Ricardo, 2017. "A case study on global sensitivity analysis with dependent inputs: The natural gas transmission model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 11-21.
    20. Yun, Wanying & Lu, Zhenzhou & Jiang, Xian, 2019. "An efficient method for moment-independent global sensitivity analysis by dimensional reduction technique and principle of maximum entropy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 174-182.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Uncertainty quantification; Local and global sensitivity methods; Risk contribution of dependent risks; Differential importance measure; Actuarial mathematical model;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G22 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Insurance; Insurance Companies; Actuarial Studies
    • C60 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:95:y:2020:i:c:p:48-58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505554 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.