IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v227y2013i6p641-650.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimation of conditional moment by moving least squares and its application for importance analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Wenbin Ruan
  • Zhenzhou Lu
  • Pengfei Wei

Abstract

Combined with advantages of moving least squares approximation, a new method for estimating higher-order conditional moment is established, which is useful for application in importance analysis and provides a supplement of the standard variance-based importance analysis. On the other hand, after obtaining the first four-order moments, the probability density function can be emulated by use of the Edgeworth expansion procedure, thereby a new method to compute the moment independent importance measure index δ i proposed by Borgonovo is presented in this article. Two examples are employed to demonstrate that it is necessary to analyze higher-order conditional moment in importance analysis. At the same time, we study the feasibility of the Edgeworth expansion-based method for estimating the index δ i by applying it to these examples.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenbin Ruan & Zhenzhou Lu & Pengfei Wei, 2013. "Estimation of conditional moment by moving least squares and its application for importance analysis," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 227(6), pages 641-650, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:227:y:2013:i:6:p:641-650
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X13493241
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X13493241
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X13493241?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Qiao & Homma, Toshimitsu, 2009. "A new computational method of a moment-independent uncertainty importance measure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(7), pages 1205-1211.
    2. Borgonovo, E., 2007. "A new uncertainty importance measure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(6), pages 771-784.
    3. Emanuele Borgonovo, 2006. "Measuring Uncertainty Importance: Investigation and Comparison of Alternative Approaches," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(5), pages 1349-1361, October.
    4. Ronald L. Iman & Stephen C. Hora, 1990. "A Robust Measure of Uncertainty Importance for Use in Fault Tree System Analysis," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(3), pages 401-406, September.
    5. Ratto, M. & Pagano, A. & Young, P.C., 2009. "Non-parametric estimation of conditional moments for sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 237-243.
    6. Cheng, Xixin & Li, W.K. & Yu, Philip L.H. & Zhou, Xuan & Wang, Chao & Lo, P.H., 2011. "Modeling threshold conditional heteroscedasticity with regime-dependent skewness and kurtosis," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(9), pages 2590-2604, September.
    7. Josse, J. & Pagès, J. & Husson, F., 2008. "Testing the significance of the RV coefficient," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 82-91, September.
    8. Andrea Saltelli, 2002. "Sensitivity Analysis for Importance Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3), pages 579-590, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tatsuya Sakurahara & Seyed Reihani & Ernie Kee & Zahra Mohaghegh, 2020. "Global importance measure methodology for integrated probabilistic risk assessment," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(2), pages 377-396, April.
    2. S. Cucurachi & E. Borgonovo & R. Heijungs, 2016. "A Protocol for the Global Sensitivity Analysis of Impact Assessment Models in Life Cycle Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(2), pages 357-377, February.
    3. Wenbin Ruan & Zhenzhou Lu & Longfei Tian, 2013. "A modified variance-based importance measure and its solution by state dependent parameter," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 227(1), pages 3-15, February.
    4. Yun, Wanying & Lu, Zhenzhou & Feng, Kaixuan & Li, Luyi, 2019. "An elaborate algorithm for analyzing the Borgonovo moment-independent sensitivity by replacing the probability density function estimation with the probability estimation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 99-108.
    5. Barry Anderson & Emanuele Borgonovo & Marzio Galeotti & Roberto Roson, 2014. "Uncertainty in Climate Change Modeling: Can Global Sensitivity Analysis Be of Help?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(2), pages 271-293, February.
    6. Guijie Li & Zhenzhou Lu & Longfei Tian & Jia Xu, 2013. "The importance measure on the non-probabilistic reliability index of uncertain structures," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 227(6), pages 651-661, December.
    7. Xin Xu & Zhenzhou Lu & Xiaopeng Luo, 2014. "A Stable Approach Based on Asymptotic Space Integration for Moment‐Independent Uncertainty Importance Measure," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(2), pages 235-251, February.
    8. Derennes, Pierre & Morio, Jérôme & Simatos, Florian, 2019. "A nonparametric importance sampling estimator for moment independent importance measures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 3-16.
    9. Yishang Zhang & Yongshou Liu & Xufeng Yang & Bin Zhao, 2015. "An efficient Kriging method for global sensitivity of structural reliability analysis with non-probabilistic convex model," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(5), pages 442-455, October.
    10. Wei, Pengfei & Lu, Zhenzhou & Yuan, Xiukai, 2013. "Monte Carlo simulation for moment-independent sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 60-67.
    11. Emanuele Borgonovo & Gordon B. Hazen & Elmar Plischke, 2016. "A Common Rationale for Global Sensitivity Measures and Their Estimation," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(10), pages 1871-1895, October.
    12. Emanuele Borgonovo & William Castaings & Stefano Tarantola, 2011. "Moment Independent Importance Measures: New Results and Analytical Test Cases," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 404-428, March.
    13. Luo, Xiaopeng & Lu, Zhenzhou & Xu, Xin, 2014. "Non-parametric kernel estimation for the ANOVA decomposition and sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 140-148.
    14. Pengfei Wei & Zhenzhou Lu & Jingwen Song, 2014. "Moment‐Independent Sensitivity Analysis Using Copula," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(2), pages 210-222, February.
    15. Plischke, Elmar & Borgonovo, Emanuele & Smith, Curtis L., 2013. "Global sensitivity measures from given data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(3), pages 536-550.
    16. Pengfei Wei & Zhenzhou Lu & Jingwen Song, 2014. "Uncertainty Importance Analysis Using Parametric Moment Ratio Functions," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(2), pages 223-234, February.
    17. Xing Pan & Lunhu Hu & Ziling Xin & Shenghan Zhou & Yanmei Lin & Yong Wu, 2018. "Risk Scenario Generation Based on Importance Measure Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, September.
    18. Isadora Antoniano‐Villalobos & Emanuele Borgonovo & Sumeda Siriwardena, 2018. "Which Parameters Are Important? Differential Importance Under Uncertainty," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(11), pages 2459-2477, November.
    19. Wang, Zhenqiang & Jia, Gaofeng, 2020. "Augmented sample-based approach for efficient evaluation of risk sensitivity with respect to epistemic uncertainty in distribution parameters," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    20. Elmar Plischke & Emanuele Borgonovo, 2020. "Fighting the Curse of Sparsity: Probabilistic Sensitivity Measures From Cumulative Distribution Functions," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(12), pages 2639-2660, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:227:y:2013:i:6:p:641-650. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.