IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssb/v76y2014i5p925-947.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transformations and invariance in the sensitivity analysis of computer experiments

Author

Listed:
  • E. Borgonovo
  • S. Tarantola
  • E. Plischke
  • M. D. Morris

Abstract

type="main" xml:id="rssb12052-abs-0001"> Monotonic transformations are widely employed in statistics and data analysis. In computer experiments they are often used to gain accuracy in the estimation of global sensitivity statistics. However, one faces the question of interpreting results that are obtained on the transformed data back on the original data. The situation is even more complex in computer experiments, because transformations alter the model input–output mapping and distort the estimators. This work demonstrates that the problem can be solved by utilizing statistics which are monotonic transformation invariant. To do so, we offer an investigation into the families of metrics either based on densities or on cumulative distribution functions that are monotonic transformation invariant and we introduce a new generalized family of metrics. Numerical experiments show that transformations allow numerical convergence in the estimates of global sensitivity statistics, both invariant and not, in cases in which it would otherwise be impossible to obtain convergence. However, one fully exploits the increased numerical accuracy if the global sensitivity statistic is monotonic transformation invariant. Conversely, estimators of measures that do not have this invariance property might lead to misleading deductions.

Suggested Citation

  • E. Borgonovo & S. Tarantola & E. Plischke & M. D. Morris, 2014. "Transformations and invariance in the sensitivity analysis of computer experiments," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 76(5), pages 925-947, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:76:y:2014:i:5:p:925-947
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/rssb.2014.76.issue-5
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:76:y:2014:i:5:p:925-947. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.