IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/iburev/v9y2000i6p755-770.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reconciling positive and interpretative international management research: a native category approach

Author

Listed:
  • Harris, Simon

Abstract

The use of 'native categories' in management research avoids the input of researchers' a priori understandings into the research process. The rich, unobservable and subjective perceptions of managers may be explored through interpretative research approaches, but these do not meet the positive aspiration of generating findings of generalisable application. A gulf exists between these two research approaches. An approach is described and evaluated which, in attempting to address the 'native category' problem in a comparative management research study, reconciles many of the objectives of interpretative and positive research. It explicitly recognises imperfection in all research approaches, and strikes a range of appropriate compromises. It is a way of accessing managers' 'native category' data results that is amenable to interpretative and positive, qualitative and quantitative analysis. The approach presented shows that the gulf between interpretative and positive approaches may be bridged, and other 'bridges' may be developed for other research enquiries.

Suggested Citation

  • Harris, Simon, 2000. "Reconciling positive and interpretative international management research: a native category approach," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 9(6), pages 755-770, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:iburev:v:9:y:2000:i:6:p:755-770
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969593100000305
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Buckley, Peter J. & Chapman, Malcolm, 1996. "Theory and method in international business research," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 5(3), pages 233-245, June.
    2. Linda Rouleau & Francine Séguin, 1995. "Strategy And Organization Theories: Common Forms Of Discourse," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 101-117, January.
    3. Allen S. Lee, 1991. "Integrating Positivist and Interpretive Approaches to Organizational Research," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(4), pages 342-365, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lauring, Jakob & Selmer, Jan, 2010. "The supportive expatriate spouse: An ethnographic study of spouse involvement in expatriate careers," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 59-69, February.
    2. Child, John & Hsieh, Linda & Elbanna, Said & Karmowska, Joanna & Marinova, Svetla & Puthusserry, Pushyarag & Tsai, Terence & Narooz, Rose & Zhang, Yunlu, 2017. "SME international business models: The role of context and experience," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 52(5), pages 664-679.
    3. Yunxia Zhu & Herbert W. Hildebrandt, 2013. "Effective Persuasion of International Business Sales Letters," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 391-418, June.
    4. Niels G. Noorderhaven & Jos Benders & Arjan B. Keizer, 2007. "Comprehensiveness versus Pragmatism: Consensus at the Japanese–Dutch Interface," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(8), pages 1349-1370, December.
    5. Sigfusson, Thor & Harris, Simon, 2013. "Domestic market context and international entrepreneurs’ relationship portfolios," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 243-258.
    6. Coviello, Nicole E. & Jones, Marian V., 2004. "Methodological issues in international entrepreneurship research," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 485-508, July.
    7. Gavin Jack & Robert Westwood, 2006. "Postcolonialism and the politics of qualitative research in international business," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 481-501, August.
    8. Riviere, Monica & Suder, Gabriele & Bass, A. Erin, 2018. "Exploring the role of internationalization knowledge in fostering strategic renewal: A dynamic capabilities perspective," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 66-77.
    9. Park, Jeong-Yang & Harris, Simon, 2014. "Microfoundations for learning within international joint ventures," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 490-503.
    10. Harris, Simon & Wheeler, Colin, 2005. "Entrepreneurs' relationships for internationalization: functions, origins and strategies," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 187-207, April.
    11. Agnieszka Chidlow & Pervez N. Ghauri, 2011. "Establishing Data Collection Procedures Equivalence in International Business Research," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series wp1013, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan.
    12. Clinton, Eric & McAdam, Maura & Gamble, Jordan Robert, 2018. "Transgenerational entrepreneurial family firms: An examination of the business model construct," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 269-285.
    13. Hsieh, Linda & Child, John & Narooz, Rose & Elbanna, Said & Karmowska, Joanna & Marinova, Svetla & Puthusserry, Pushyarag & Tsai, Terence & Zhang, Yunlu, 2019. "A multidimensional perspective of SME internationalization speed: The influence of entrepreneurial characteristics," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 268-283.
    14. Fiona Moore, 2012. "The Diorama," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 52(5), pages 619-642, October.
    15. Chapman, Malcolm & Gajewska-De Mattos, Hanna & Clegg, Jeremy & Jennings Buckley, Peter, 2008. "Close neighbours and distant friends--perceptions of cultural distance," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 217-234, June.
    16. Gamble, Jordan Robert & Brennan, Michael & McAdam, Rodney, 2017. "A rewarding experience? Exploring how crowdfunding is affecting music industry business models," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 25-36.
    17. Nitish Singh & Surender Munjal & Sumit Kundu & K. Rangarajan, 2023. "Platform-Based Internationalization of Smaller Firms: The Role of Government Policy," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 91-115, February.
    18. Georgios Stamos & Dimosthenis Kotsopoulos, 2024. "Applying IS-Enabled Telework during COVID-19 Lockdown Periods and Beyond: Insights from Employees in a Greek Banking Institution," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-48, February.
    19. Shi, Xinping & Wright, Philip C., 2003. "The potential impacts of national feelings on international business negotiations: a study in the China context," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 311-328, June.
    20. Bradley J. Koch & Pamela Tremain Koch & Yiheng Deng, 2023. "China and U.S. organizational culture via value statements: an emic-etic yin-yang approach," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(3), pages 1094-1130, July.
    21. Thor Sigfusson & Simon Harris, 2012. "The relationship formation paths of international entrepreneurs," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 325-349, December.
    22. Howe-Walsh, Liza & Turnbull, Sarah & Budhwar, Pawan, 2019. "An investigation into on-sourcing of advertising creativity in an emerging economy: The case of the United Arab Emirates," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 356-364.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Coviello, Nicole E. & Jones, Marian V., 2004. "Methodological issues in international entrepreneurship research," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 485-508, July.
    2. Kübra Mert, 2020. "Türk Yazınında Uluslararası İşletmecilik: 1990-2019 Yıllarına Dair Bir İçerik Analizi," Istanbul Management Journal, Istanbul University Business School, vol. 0(89), pages 97-132, December.
    3. Nagy, A., 2009. "Adoption of interorganizational information systems : The adoption position model," Other publications TiSEM af471297-bf03-43bf-88c1-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    4. Pierre Berthon & Leyland Pitt & Michael Ewing & Christopher L. Carr, 2002. "Potential Research Space in MIS: A Framework for Envisioning and Evaluating Research Replication, Extension, and Generation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(4), pages 416-427, December.
    5. Koppius, O.R. & Ozdemir, O. & van der Laan, E.A., 2011. "Beyond Waste Reduction: Creating Value with Information Systems in Closed-Loop Supply Chains," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2011-024-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    6. David S. A. Guttormsen & Fiona Moore, 2023. "‘Thinking About How We Think’: Using Bourdieu’s Epistemic Reflexivity to Reduce Bias in International Business Research," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 63(4), pages 531-559, August.
    7. A’ang Subiyakto & Abd. Rahman Ahlan & Syopiansyah Jaya Putra & Mira Kartiwi, 2015. "Validation of Information System Project Success Model," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(2), pages 21582440155, April.
    8. Ajnesh Prasad & Albert Mills, 2010. "Critical Management Studies and Business Ethics: A Synthesis and Three Research Trajectories for the Coming Decade," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 94(2), pages 227-237, August.
    9. Arvin Sahaym & Joseph Vithayathil & Suprateek Sarker & Saonee Sarker & Niels Bjørn-Andersen, 2023. "Value Destruction in Information Technology Ecosystems: A Mixed-Method Investigation with Interpretive Case Study and Analytical Modeling," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 508-531, June.
    10. Xuequn Wang & Leonard M. Jessup, 2014. "A Review and Synthesis of Entrepreneurship Research: Towards an Integrative Model of Dependent Variables," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 23(2), pages 163-199, September.
    11. Joerg Becker & Bjoern Niehaves & Karsten Klose, 2005. "A Framework for Epistemological Perspectives on Simulation," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 8(4), pages 1-1.
    12. Colombo, Massimo G. & Rabbiosi, Larissa, 2014. "Technological similarity, post-acquisition R&D reorganization, and innovation performance in horizontal acquisitions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(6), pages 1039-1054.
    13. Zhan, Ge, 2013. "Statistical power in international business research: Study levels and data types," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 678-686.
    14. Kapil Dev Singh, 2015. "Creating Your Own Qualitative Research Approach: Selecting, Integrating and Operationalizing Philosophy, Methodology and Methods," Vision, , vol. 19(2), pages 132-146, June.
    15. Jansen, E. Pieter, 2002. "The use of performance information case studies in local social services departments," Research Report 02A19, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    16. Allen S. Lee & Richard L. Baskerville, 2003. "Generalizing Generalizability in Information Systems Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 14(3), pages 221-243, September.
    17. Imran Khan & Guo Xitong & Zeeshan Ahmad & Fakhar Shahzad, 2019. "Investigating Factors Impelling the Adoption of e-Health: A Perspective of African Expats in China," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(3), pages 21582440198, July.
    18. Wolfgang Breuer & Jannis Bischof & Christian Hofmann & Jochen Hundsdoerfer & Hans-Ulrich Küpper & Marko Sarstedt & Philipp Schreck & Tim Weitzel & Peter Witt, 2023. "Recent developments in Business Economics," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(6), pages 989-1013, August.
    19. Kevin Hindle, 2004. "Choosing Qualitative Methods for Entrepreneurial Cognition Research: A Canonical Development Approach," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 28(6), pages 575-607, November.
    20. Bradley C. Wheeler, 2002. "NEBIC: A Dynamic Capabilities Theory for Assessing Net-Enablement," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(2), pages 125-146, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:iburev:v:9:y:2000:i:6:p:755-770. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/133/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.