IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/iburev/v32y2023i6s0969593123000185.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Co-evolutions in global decoupling: Learning from the global semiconductor industry

Author

Listed:
  • Gao, Hongzhi
  • Ren, Monica
  • Shih, Tsui-Yii

Abstract

Discussion of deglobalization in recent years appears to be focused on decoupling the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from the US-led global value chains (GVCs). While country policies co-evolve with one another in decoupling, firm strategic responses co-evolve with government policies. In this study, we explore key co-evolutionary conditions of reciprocally coupled ecosystems, diversity and selective stress in the context of the global semiconductor industry. We apply co-evolutionary constructs of bidirectional causality, qualitatively new system, and niche specialization to make sense of adaptive responses of third-party manufacturers (Taiwanese foundry businesses) in the US-PRC decoupling. Our study posits that a third-party manufacturer can survive, and even enhance their strategic and competitive advantages, despite political disruptions in international markets. Third-party manufacturers can engage in symbolic decentralization and balancing strategies with regard to their manufacturing locations in their co-evolutions with the policy changes during the US-PRC decoupling.

Suggested Citation

  • Gao, Hongzhi & Ren, Monica & Shih, Tsui-Yii, 2023. "Co-evolutions in global decoupling: Learning from the global semiconductor industry," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(6).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:iburev:v:32:y:2023:i:6:s0969593123000185
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2023.102118
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969593123000185
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2023.102118?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guangshun Qiao & Zhan-ao Wang, 2021. "Vertical integration vs. specialization: a nonparametric conditional efficiency estimate for the global semiconductor industry," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 139-150, December.
    2. Tung, An-Chi, 2001. "Taiwan's Semiconductor Industry: What the State Did and Did Not," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(2), pages 266-288, June.
    3. Gary Gereffi, 2014. "Global value chains in a post-Washington Consensus world," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 9-37, February.
    4. Jay B. Barney, 1996. "The Resource-Based Theory of the Firm," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(5), pages 469-469, October.
    5. Tan, Hao & Yang, Mengying, 2021. "The New Liability of Origin in Global Decoupling," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(3), pages 624-629, July.
    6. Geels, Frank W., 2014. "Reconceptualising the co-evolution of firms-in-industries and their environments: Developing an inter-disciplinary Triple Embeddedness Framework," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 261-277.
    7. Witt, Michael A. & Li, Peter Ping & Välikangas, Liisa & Lewin, Arie Y., 2021. "De-globalization and Decoupling: Game Changing Consequences?," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(1), pages 6-15, February.
    8. An‐Chi Tung, 2001. "Taiwan’s Semiconductor Industry: What the State Did and Did Not," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(2), pages 266-288, June.
    9. Andrew Delios, 2017. "The Death and Rebirth (?) of International Business Research," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(3), pages 391-397, May.
    10. Winder, Nick & McIntosh, Brian S. & Jeffrey, Paul, 2005. "The origin, diagnostic attributes and practical application of co-evolutionary theory," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(4), pages 347-361, September.
    11. Song, Yiru & Yu, Chunjiao & Hao, Lulu & Chen, Xi, 2021. "Path for China's high-tech industry to participate in the reconstruction of global value chains," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    12. Catherine Welch & Rebecca Piekkari & Emmanuella Plakoyiannaki & Eriikka Paavilainen-Mantymaki, 2011. "Theorising from case studies: Towards a pluralist future for international business research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 42(5), pages 740-762, June.
    13. Michael A. Witt, 2019. "De-globalization: Theories, predictions, and opportunities for international business research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(7), pages 1053-1077, September.
    14. Jörg Nowak, 2022. "Do choke points provide workers in logistics with power? A critique of the power resources approach in light of the 2018 truckers’ strike in Brazil," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(5), pages 1675-1697, September.
    15. David Ahlstrom & Jean‐Luc Arregle & Michael A. Hitt & Gongming Qian & Xufei Ma & Dries Faems, 2020. "Managing Technological, Sociopolitical, and Institutional Change in the New Normal," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(3), pages 411-437, May.
    16. Williamson, Peter, 2021. "De-Globalisation and Decoupling: Post-COVID-19 Myths versus Realities," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(1), pages 29-34, February.
    17. Hongzhi Gao & Monica Ren, 2020. "Overreliance on China and dynamic balancing in the shift of global value chains in response to global pandemic COVID-19: an Australian and New Zealand perspective," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(3), pages 306-310, July.
    18. Leonard K. Cheng & Gregory W. Whitten & Jingbo Hua, 2019. "The national security argument for protection of domestic industries," Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 365-388, October.
    19. Henry Wai-chung Yeung, 2022. "Explaining Geographic Shifts of Chip Making toward East Asia and Market Dynamics in Semiconductor Global Production Networks," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 98(3), pages 272-298, May.
    20. Wei Yin, 2021. "A comparison of the US and EU regulatory responses to China’s state capitalism: implication, issue and direction," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 1-25, March.
    21. Luciano Ciravegna & Snejina Michailova, 2022. "Why the world economy needs, but will not get, more globalization in the post-COVID-19 decade," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(1), pages 172-186, February.
    22. Hu, Yimei & Tian, Kailan & Wu, Tian & Yang, Cuihong, 2021. "The Lose-Lose Consequence: Assessing US-China Trade Decoupling through the Lens of Global Value Chains," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(2), pages 429-446, May.
    23. Witt, Michael A. & Lewin, Arie Y. & Li, Peter Ping & Gaur, Ajai, 2023. "Decoupling in international business: Evidence, drivers, impact, and implications for IB research," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 58(1).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fjellström, Daniella & Bai, Wensong & Oliveira, Luis & Fang, Tony, 2023. "Springboard internationalisation in times of geopolitical tensions," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(6).
    2. Victor Cui & Ilan Vertinsky & Yonggui Wang & Dongsheng Zhou, 2023. "Decoupling in international business: The ‘new’ vulnerability of globalization and MNEs’ response strategies," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 54(8), pages 1562-1576, October.
    3. Meyer, Klaus E. & Fang, Tony & Panibratov, Andrei Y. & Peng, Mike W. & Gaur, Ajai, 2023. "International business under sanctions," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 58(2).
    4. Sergio Mariotti, 2022. "A warning from the Russian–Ukrainian war: avoiding a future that rhymes with the past," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 49(4), pages 761-782, December.
    5. Witt, Michael A. & Lewin, Arie Y. & Li, Peter Ping & Gaur, Ajai, 2023. "Decoupling in international business: Evidence, drivers, impact, and implications for IB research," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 58(1).
    6. Delios, Andrew & Perchthold, Gordon & Capri, Alex, 2021. "Cohesion, COVID-19 and contemporary challenges to globalization," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 56(3).
    7. Agramont Lechín, Daniel, 2022. "China-US economic war: opportunities for the Andean Community beyond the decoupling process," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 116642, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Farkas, Beáta & Pelle, Anita & Somosi, Sarolta, 2023. "Az Európai Unió és a geoökonómiai kihívások - ipar- és versenypolitikai válaszok [The European Union and geoeconomic challenges: industrial and competition policy responses]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(11), pages 1193-1212.
    9. Jun Hong Park & Hyunseog Chung & Ki Hong Kim & Jin Ju Kim & Chulung Lee, 2021. "The Impact of Technological Capability on Financial Performance in the Semiconductor Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.
    10. Cheung, Zeerim & Aalto, Eero & Nevalainen, Pasi, 2020. "Institutional Logics and the Internationalization of a State-Owned Enterprise: Evaluation of International Venture Opportunities by Telecom Finland 1987–1998," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 55(6).
    11. Catherine Welch & Eriikka Paavilainen-Mäntymäki & Rebecca Piekkari & Emmanuella Plakoyiannaki, 2022. "Reconciling theory and context: How the case study can set a new agenda for international business research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(1), pages 4-26, February.
    12. David S. A. Guttormsen & Fiona Moore, 2023. "‘Thinking About How We Think’: Using Bourdieu’s Epistemic Reflexivity to Reduce Bias in International Business Research," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 63(4), pages 531-559, August.
    13. Puhr, Harald & Müllner, Jakob, 2022. "Foreign to all but fluent in many: The effect of multinationality on shock resilience," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 57(6).
    14. Tiina Ritvala & Nina Granqvist & Rebecca Piekkari, 2021. "A processual view of organizational stigmatization in foreign market entry: The failure of Guggenheim Helsinki," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(2), pages 282-305, March.
    15. Mike W. Peng & Joyce C. Wang & Nishant Kathuria & Jia Shen & Miranda J. Welbourne Eleazar, 2023. "Toward an institution-based paradigm," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 353-382, June.
    16. Rosalie L. Tung & Gary Knight & Pervez Ghauri & Shameen Prashantham & Tony Fang, 2023. "Disruptive knowledge in international business research: A pipe dream or attainable target?," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 54(9), pages 1589-1598, December.
    17. Wang, Chi-Tai & Chiu, Chui-Sheng, 2014. "Competitive strategies for Taiwan's semiconductor industry in a new world economy," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 60-73.
    18. Anne Bartel-Radic & Fabienne Munch, 2023. "Cross-cultural boundary spanning activities in a global team," Post-Print halshs-04148890, HAL.
    19. Röell, Christiaan & Osabutey, Ellis & Rodgers, Peter & Arndt, Felix & Khan, Zaheer & Tarba, Shlomo, 2022. "Managing socio-political risk at the subnational level: Lessons from MNE subsidiaries in Indonesia," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 57(3).
    20. Huiwen Gong & Robert Hassink & Christopher Foster & Martin Hess & Harry Garretsen, 2022. "Globalisation in reverse? Reconfiguring the geographies of value chains and production networks [Does Covid-19 Spark the End of Globalisation?]," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 15(2), pages 165-181.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:iburev:v:32:y:2023:i:6:s0969593123000185. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/133/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.