IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Creating alternative spaces and articulating needs: Challenging gendered notions of forestry and forest ownership through women's networks

Listed author(s):
  • Andersson, Elias
  • Lidestav, Gun
Registered author(s):

    The forest industry continues to be men dominated, dependent on forest owners' supply of raw material and of significant importance to the national and local economy and economic development in Sweden. The interconnection between masculinity and the work, knowledge, forest owners and professionals in the sector contributes to exclusion of women. In response to this, women forest owners have formed networks in different local areas. Through focus group interviews, this study examined the strategies, functions and positions of these networks, both in their individual locations and the overall policy processes of gender mainstreaming of the sector, to scrutinise the reproduction of gender inequities and the gendered notion of forestry. The results show how the networks are acting to expand the discursive space, establish alternative publics and empower their members by inventing and circulating counterdiscourses. The different strategies adopted by the networks appear to have emerged in response to contemporary political processes. The conclusion is that one single public sphere cannot encompass the diversity of the contemporary forestry sector, indicating a need to contain a multiplicity of publics, both to challenge the modes of deliberation that mask domination and to facilitate transformative processes.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Forest Policy and Economics.

    Volume (Year): 67 (2016)
    Issue (Month): C ()
    Pages: 38-44

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:67:y:2016:i:c:p:38-44
    DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.03.014
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. Storch, Sabine, 2011. "Forestry professionalism overrides gender: A case study of nature perception in Germany," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 171-175, March.
    2. anonymous, 2005. "Monetary policy report to the Congress," Federal Reserve Bulletin, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.), issue Spr, pages 117-142.
    3. anonymous, 2005. "The implementation of monetary policy," Monograph, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.), number 2005tiom.
    4. Anonymous, 2005. "Drug Policy 1986," Working Papers id:80, eSocialSciences.
    5. Anonymous, 2005. "Review of National Competition Policy Reforms," Inquiry Reports 31898, Productivity Commission.
    6. ., 2005. "Politics and the Pact," Chapters,in: Fiscal Policy in Economic and Monetary Union, chapter 9 Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Nuggehalli, Roshni K. & Prokopy, Linda Stalker, 2009. "Motivating factors and facilitating conditions explaining women's participation in co-management of Sri Lankan forests," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 288-293, July.
    8. Piper Coutinho-Sledge, 2015. "Feminized Forestry: The Promises and Pitfalls of Change in a Masculine Organization," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(4), pages 375-389, July.
    9. anonymous, 2005. "Monetary policy report to the Congress," Federal Reserve Bulletin, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.), issue Sum, pages 319-343.
    10. Anonymous, 2005. "Modifications in Drug Policy 1986," Working Papers id:81, eSocialSciences.
    11. ., 2005. "Policy Challenges Facing Public Utilities," Chapters,in: Public Utilities, chapter 2 Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. Dmitry Sorokin, 2005. "On The Russian Economic Political Map of the World," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 1(1), pages 1-37.
    13. Anonymous, 2005. "Pharmaceutical Policy, 2002," Working Papers id:84, eSocialSciences.
    14. Buijs, Arjen & Lawrence, Anna, 2013. "Emotional conflicts in rational forestry: Towards a research agenda for understanding emotions in environmental conflicts," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 104-111.
    15. ., 2005. "Schumpeter: The Preconditions for Politics," Chapters,in: Democracy and Exchange, chapter 4 Edward Elgar Publishing.
    16. Oecd, 2006. "Decoupling: Policy Implications," OECD Papers, OECD Publishing, vol. 5(11), pages 1-29.
    17. Alison Woodward, 2003. "European Gender Mainstreaming: Promises and Pitfalls of Transformative Policy -super-1," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 20(1), pages 65-88, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:67:y:2016:i:c:p:38-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.