Author
Listed:
- Zhu, Xuemin
- Long, Yizhu
- Zhang, Han
Abstract
Diverging perspectives persist concerning the impacts of carbon policies on forest carbon sequestration and their supply dynamics in China. This study develops a double-margin framework to assess the effect of carbon policies. The Faustmann-Hartman model and the land-use share model are first employed to show the mechanisms by which policies affect forest operators decision-making at the extensive (i.e. changes in forest area) and intensive (i.e. changes in rotation age) margins in each province. We then establish multiple scenarios to simulate the responses of forest operators to carbon policies and the functioning of the forest carbon sequestration supply. We find that policy interventions effectively modulate both intensive and extensive carbon sequestration supply through price mechanisms, generating divergent environmental benefits across policy scenarios. The marginal increase in carbon sequestration declines as the carbon price rises. Furthermore, forest carbon sequestration critically contribute to China's emission mitigation, delivering synergistic ecological and economic co-benefits. In the subsidy scenario, maintaining the standard rotation age facilitates a balance between economic and ecological benefits when the carbon price remains below 276.32 CNY/tCO2; once the carbon price surpasses the threshold of 506.64 CNY/tCO2, the harvesting of over-mature forests becomes financially sensible. In the carbon tax scenario, a tax exceeding 115.64 CNY/tCO2 enhances policy effectiveness. The forest carbon sequestration supply curve exhibits a quadratic pattern, revealing optimal carbon prices of 365.42, 457.19, and 1031.38 CNY/tCO2 for scenarios 1–3. However, the impact of these prices on promoting carbon neutrality is limited.
Suggested Citation
Zhu, Xuemin & Long, Yizhu & Zhang, Han, 2025.
"Impact of carbon policies on forest carbon sequestration supply at intensive and extensive margins,"
Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:forpol:v:181:y:2025:i:c:s1389934125002448
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103665
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:181:y:2025:i:c:s1389934125002448. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.