IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v176y2025ics1389934125000905.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is forest conservation a socially optimal strategy for increasing forest carbon sequestration?

Author

Listed:
  • Gong, Peichen
  • Susaeta, Andres

Abstract

Previous studies show that the optimal rotation period would be infinitely long when carbon price is sufficiently high, indicating that forest preservation could serve as an optimal strategy for mitigating global warming. This paper examines the impact of the substitution effect of harvested wood products (HWP) and the risk of natural disturbances on the optimality of infinitely long rotation period. Our analysis shows that when the substitution effects of HWP are significant, the optimal rotation remains finite regardless of how high the carbon price is. Conversely, when the substitution effects are minimal, there exists a threshold carbon price beyond which the optimal rotation period becomes infinite. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the risk of natural disturbances can either increase or decrease the likelihood that forest preservation remains the optimal choice for climate change mitigation. A numerical example illustrates that even with conservative assumptions about the substitution effect of HWP, the optimal rotation remains finite, and the risk of forest damage further reduces the optimal rotation.

Suggested Citation

  • Gong, Peichen & Susaeta, Andres, 2025. "Is forest conservation a socially optimal strategy for increasing forest carbon sequestration?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:176:y:2025:i:c:s1389934125000905
    DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103511
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934125000905
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103511?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:176:y:2025:i:c:s1389934125000905. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.