IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finlet/v88y2026ics1544612325024158.html

Biodiversity reporting and Staggered Board

Author

Listed:
  • Treepongkaruna, Sirimon
  • Suttipun, Muttanachai
  • Padungsaksawasdi, Chaiyuth

Abstract

This paper explores the effect of staggered board on company’s biodiversity reporting for the U.S. firms over the period of 2002 to 2018. Together with and without selected control variables, evidence from the pooled regression and the panel regressions with the fixed effect and the random effect clearly demonstrates that firms with staggered board are less likely to report on biodiversity. The negative effect of staggered board on biodiversity provides evidence of adverse effects on environmental sustainability. The results of the two-stage least squares regression show that endogeneity is not of concern, implying unbiased and valid estimations of the main results. Our findings support the agency theory and managerial entrenchment hypothesis.

Suggested Citation

  • Treepongkaruna, Sirimon & Suttipun, Muttanachai & Padungsaksawasdi, Chaiyuth, 2026. "Biodiversity reporting and Staggered Board," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:88:y:2026:i:c:s1544612325024158
    DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2025.109166
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612325024158
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.frl.2025.109166?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:88:y:2026:i:c:s1544612325024158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/frl .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.