IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v34y2026i1p131-152.html

Biodiversity Research From an Accountability Perspective: Current Gaps and Prospects for Future Research

Author

Listed:
  • Damilola Felix Eluyela
  • Rakesh Pandey
  • Craig Deegan
  • Mansi Mansi

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to apply an accountability model to systematically review the biodiversity accounting research published in accounting journals over the last 23 years (2002–2024). An instrument containing a list of questions and sub‐questions addressing four steps of an accountability model—why to report, to whom to report, what to report, and how to report—was developed to systematically review the biodiversity literature with the help of 14 biodiversity experts. A final sample of 98 articles published within 23 accounting journals was reviewed to investigate the accountability focus embodied within the biodiversity accounting literature. In addition to providing useful insights to users, managers, preparers, regulators, and standard‐setters, this study makes a valuable contribution to accounting research by identifying and addressing important gaps in the literature—and therefore important research avenues—with respect to important issues associated with organisational accountability for biodiversity.

Suggested Citation

  • Damilola Felix Eluyela & Rakesh Pandey & Craig Deegan & Mansi Mansi, 2026. "Biodiversity Research From an Accountability Perspective: Current Gaps and Prospects for Future Research," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(1), pages 131-152, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:34:y:2026:i:1:p:131-152
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.70259
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70259
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.70259?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:34:y:2026:i:1:p:131-152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.