IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finana/v106y2025ics1057521925005927.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does ecology protection conflict with corporate development? Evidence from biodiversity and corporate total factor productivity in China

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Yulei
  • Hu, Shiyang
  • Zhu, Bo

Abstract

This study uses China's National Park System policy (NPS policy) as an exogenous shock for Chinese listed firms and investigates the causal relationship between biodiversity conservation on corporate total factor productivity. Using a staggered Difference-in-Differences (DID) model, our results reveal a significant causal increase in the total factor productivity of firms treated by the NPS policy. Further analyses confirm that improving green technological innovation and optimizing the efficiency of resource allocation under environmental regulation with punitive and supportive tactics by government are important transmission channels. Moreover, this positive impact of the NPS policy on total factor productivity is more pronounced for jurisdictions with greater ecological protection motivation by local government, regions with intenser public concern for biodiversity, or firms with higher biodiversity awareness. Our findings highlight the importance of valuing biodiversity protection practices to promote a win-win situation between environment and economy development.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Yulei & Hu, Shiyang & Zhu, Bo, 2025. "Does ecology protection conflict with corporate development? Evidence from biodiversity and corporate total factor productivity in China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:106:y:2025:i:c:s1057521925005927
    DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104505
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521925005927
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104505?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:106:y:2025:i:c:s1057521925005927. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620166 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.