IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finana/v106y2025ics1057521925006441.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do banks price firms' biodiversity risk? Evidence from the Kunming declaration

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Jun
  • Jin, Yihang
  • Zhou, Peng

Abstract

The pricing of firms' biodiversity risk exposure, as an emerging dimension of environmental risk, remains a contentious topic. This study employs the international syndicated long loan data from 2013 to 2023 and adopts the exogenous shock of the Kunming Declaration as an identification strategy to examine the effects of biodiversity risk on firms' loan spreads. The findings reveal that: (1) Following the Kunming Declaration, firms with higher biodiversity risk are subject to significantly higher loan spreads, underscoring the presence of a biodiversity risk premium; (2) Firms with weaker debt-paying ability experience even greater increases in loan spreads when exposed to biodiversity risk. Additionally, banks with commitments to ecological sustainability, namely green banks, charge higher loan spreads to firms with higher biodiversity risk than other banks; (3) Banks weigh biodiversity transition risk more heavily than physical risk in their loan pricing processes; (4) From the perspective of the interaction between legal institutions and financial mechanisms, this paper finds that the biodiversity risk premium in syndicated loans is primarily driven by the common law system; (5) In addition to charging higher loan spreads, banks mitigate their biodiversity risk exposure by cutting loan amounts, shortening maturities, and raising fees. This study contributes new evidence to the ongoing controversy on biodiversity risk pricing and offers policy implications for policymakers, financial institutions, and firms in managing biodiversity risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Jun & Jin, Yihang & Zhou, Peng, 2025. "Do banks price firms' biodiversity risk? Evidence from the Kunming declaration," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:106:y:2025:i:c:s1057521925006441
    DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104557
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521925006441
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104557?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:106:y:2025:i:c:s1057521925006441. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620166 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.