IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eurman/v40y2022i2p151-162.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Societal effects of social media in organizations: Reflective points deriving from a systematic literature review and a bibliometric meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Vrontis, Demetris
  • Siachou, Evangelia
  • Sakka, Georgia
  • Chatterjee, Sheshadri
  • Chaudhuri, Ranjan
  • Ghosh, Arka

Abstract

Social media provides its users with uninterrupted access to information for a variety of matters. On the one hand, social media helps people to express themselves freely and access various content, thus, forming a global view. On the other hand, social media may easily lead individuals to form polarized attitudes by impacting their behaviour in various contexts (e.g., organizational contexts). Such contradiction cannot be neglected. It is found to be an essential societal phenomenon that needs further investigation. The study first aims at realizing how existing literature of different domains analyse and conceptualize the effects of social media. Then, it leverages such societal effects on organizations. A total of 231 articles were used for a systematic literature review (SLR) and bibliometric meta-analysis on this topic and were further analysed with VOSviewer software. The study organizes the existing literature on this topic and provides issues, perceptions, and theories that are used to explain the effects of social media in society, and then it reflects on the potential impact on organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Vrontis, Demetris & Siachou, Evangelia & Sakka, Georgia & Chatterjee, Sheshadri & Chaudhuri, Ranjan & Ghosh, Arka, 2022. "Societal effects of social media in organizations: Reflective points deriving from a systematic literature review and a bibliometric meta-analysis," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 151-162.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:40:y:2022:i:2:p:151-162
    DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2022.01.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237322000196
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.emj.2022.01.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Woon, Jonathan, 2018. "Primaries and Candidate Polarization: Behavioral Theory and Experimental Evidence," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 112(4), pages 826-843, November.
    2. Sakka, Georgia & Ahammad, Mohammad Faisal, 2020. "Unpacking the relationship between employee brand ambassadorship and employee social media usage through employee wellbeing in workplace: A theoretical contribution," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 354-363.
    3. Mutz, Diana C., 2002. "Cross-cutting Social Networks: Testing Democratic Theory in Practice," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 96(1), pages 111-126, March.
    4. Ali, Maged & Azab, Nahed & Sorour, M. Karim & Dora, Manoj, 2019. "Integration v. polarisation among social media users: Perspectives through social capital theory on the recent Egyptian political landscape," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 461-473.
    5. George A. Akerlof, 1997. "Social Distance and Social Decisions," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 65(5), pages 1005-1028, September.
    6. Vicente, María Rosalía & López, Ana Jesús, 2011. "Assessing the regional digital divide across the European Union-27," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 220-237, April.
    7. Iandoli, Luca & Primario, Simonetta & Zollo, Giuseppe, 2021. "The impact of group polarization on the quality of online debate in social media: A systematic literature review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    8. Charles S. Taber & Milton Lodge, 2006. "Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 50(3), pages 755-769, July.
    9. Ebonya Washington & Sendhil Mullainathan, 2009. "Sticking with Your Vote: Cognitive Dissonance and Political Attitudes," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 1(1), pages 86-111, January.
    10. Caterina Liberati & Furio Camillo, 2015. "Discovering Hidden Concepts in Predictive Models for Texts' Polarization," International Journal of Data Warehousing and Mining (IJDWM), IGI Global, vol. 11(4), pages 29-48, October.
    11. repec:plo:pone00:0087986 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Kaplan, Andreas M. & Haenlein, Michael, 2010. "Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 59-68, January.
    13. Gordon Anderson, 2018. "Measuring Aspects of Mobility, Polarization and Convergence in the Absence of Cardinality: Indices Based Upon Transitional Typology," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 139(3), pages 887-907, October.
    14. Mostaghel, Rana, 2016. "Innovation and technology for the elderly: Systematic literature review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 4896-4900.
    15. Korzynski, Pawel & Mazurek, Grzegorz & Haenlein, Michael, 2020. "Leveraging employees as spokespeople in your HR strategy: How company-related employee posts on social media can help firms to attract new talent," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 204-212.
    16. Matthew Gentzkow & Jesse M. Shapiro, 2008. "Competition and Truth in the Market for News," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 22(2), pages 133-154, Spring.
    17. Mary M. Crossan & Marina Apaydin, 2010. "A Multi‐Dimensional Framework of Organizational Innovation: A Systematic Review of the Literature," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(6), pages 1154-1191, September.
    18. Macpherson, Allan & Holt, Robin, 2007. "Knowledge, learning and small firm growth: A systematic review of the evidence," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 172-192, March.
    19. Nees Jan Eck & Ludo Waltman, 2010. "Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 84(2), pages 523-538, August.
    20. Małgorzata J Krawczyk & Krzysztof Kułakowski & Janusz A Hołyst, 2018. "Hierarchical partitions of social networks between rivaling leaders," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-13, March.
    21. Pisani, Niccolò & Kourula, Arno & Kolk, Ans & Meijer, Renske, 2017. "How global is international CSR research? Insights and recommendations from a systematic review," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 52(5), pages 591-614.
    22. Valentina A Assenova, 2018. "Modeling the diffusion of complex innovations as a process of opinion formation through social networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, May.
    23. Alsaad, Abdallah & Taamneh, Abdallah & Al-Jedaiah, Mohamad Noor, 2018. "Does social media increase racist behavior? An examination of confirmation bias theory," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 41-46.
    24. Nino Abzianidze, 2020. "Us vs. Them as Structural Equivalence: Analysing Nationalist Discourse Networks in the Georgian Print Media," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 243-256.
    25. Nino Abzianidze, 2020. "Us vs. Them as Structural Equivalence: Analysing Nationalist Discourse Networks in the Georgian Print Media," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 243-256.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fares, Julian, 2024. "A multi-level typology for stakeholder influence: A systematic literature review using the structural approach," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 462-478.
    2. Rodriguez-Pomeda, Jesus & Casani, Fernando & Serrano-López, Antonio Eleazar, 2023. "Reflections on the diffusion of management and organization research in the context of open science in Europe," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 664-672.
    3. Nawaz, Asif & Gilal, Faheem Gul & Channa, Khalil Ahmed & Gilal, Rukhsana Gul, 2023. "Going deep into a leader's integrity: A systematic review and the way forward," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 845-863.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leonidou, Erasmia & Christofi, Michael & Vrontis, Demetris & Thrassou, Alkis, 2020. "An integrative framework of stakeholder engagement for innovation management and entrepreneurship development," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 245-258.
    2. Siachou, Evangelia & Trichina, Eleni & Papasolomou, Ioanna & Sakka, Georgia, 2021. "Why do employees hide their knowledge and what are the consequences? A systematic literature review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 195-213.
    3. Piñeiro-Chousa, Juan & López-Cabarcos, M. Ángeles & Romero-Castro, Noelia María & Pérez-Pico, Ada María, 2020. "Innovation, entrepreneurship and knowledge in the business scientific field: Mapping the research front," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 475-485.
    4. Yucheng Zhang & Zhiling Wang & Lin Xiao & Lijun Wang & Pei Huang, 2023. "Discovering the evolution of online reviews: A bibliometric review," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-22, December.
    5. Barrera, Oscar & Guriev, Sergei & Henry, Emeric & Zhuravskaya, Ekaterina, 2020. "Facts, alternative facts, and fact checking in times of post-truth politics," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    6. Mishra, Nidhi & Bharti, Teena & Tiwari, Aviral Kumar & Pfajfar, Gregor, 2024. "Public and scholarly interest in social robots: An investigation through Google Trends, bibliometric analysis, and systematic literature review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    7. Philip Leifeld, 2020. "Policy Debates and Discourse Network Analysis: A Research Agenda," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 180-183.
    8. Vrontis, Demetris & Christofi, Michael, 2021. "R&D internationalization and innovation: A systematic review, integrative framework and future research directions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 812-823.
    9. Carmona-Lavado, Antonio & Gimenez-Fernandez, Elena M. & Vlaisavljevic, Vesna & Cabello-Medina, Carmen, 2023. "Cross-industry innovation: A systematic literature review," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    10. Magdalena Mucowska, 2021. "Trends of Environmentally Sustainable Solutions of Urban Last-Mile Deliveries on the E-Commerce Market—A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-26, May.
    11. Maria Elena Latino & Marta Menegoli & Martina De Giovanni, 2021. "Evaluating the Sustainability Dimensions in the Food Supply Chain: Literature Review and Research Routes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-25, October.
    12. Demir, Robert & Wennberg, Karl & McKelvie, Alexander, 2016. "The Strategic Management of High-Growth Firms: A Review and Theoretical Conceptualization," Ratio Working Papers 273, The Ratio Institute.
    13. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/1dhd1b1s319fbai85khk40fudc is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Buser, Thomas, 2024. "Adversarial Economic Preferences Predict Right-Wing Voting," IZA Discussion Papers 16711, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    15. Klarin, Anton, 2020. "The decade-long cryptocurrencies and the blockchain rollercoaster: Mapping the intellectual structure and charting future directions," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    16. Pekkala, Kaisa & van Zoonen, Ward, 2022. "Work-related social media use: The mediating role of social media communication self-efficacy," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 67-76.
    17. Zahra Ghorbani & Sanaz Kargaran & Ali Saberi & Manijeh Haghighinasab & Seyedh Mahboobeh Jamali & Nader Ale Ebrahim, 2022. "Trends and patterns in digital marketing research: bibliometric analysis," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(2), pages 158-172, June.
    18. Angelo Kenneth S. Romasanta & Peter Sijde & Jacqueline Muijlwijk-Koezen, 2020. "Innovation in pharmaceutical R&D: mapping the research landscape," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(3), pages 1801-1832, December.
    19. Bucciol, Alessandro, 2018. "False claims in politics: Evidence from the US," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 196-210.
    20. Xianru Shang & Zijian Liu & Chen Gong & Zhigang Hu & Yuexuan Wu & Chengliang Wang, 2024. "Knowledge mapping and evolution of research on older adults’ technology acceptance: a bibliometric study from 2013 to 2023," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, December.
    21. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/1dhd1b1s319fbai85khk40fudc is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Christofi, Michael & Vrontis, Demetris & Thrassou, Alkis & Shams, S.M. Riad, 2019. "Triggering technological innovation through cross-border mergers and acquisitions: A micro-foundational perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 148-166.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:40:y:2022:i:2:p:151-162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/115/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.