Author
Listed:
- Chen, Shuying
- Goergen, Klaus
- Hendricks Franssen, Harrie-Jan
- Franzmann, David
- Winkler, Christoph
- Ishmam, Shitab
- Poll, Stefan
- Linssen, Jochen
- Vereecken, Harry
- Heinrichs, Heidi
Abstract
Expanding renewable energy in Africa is crucial for increasing electricity access and combating climate change, but scarce or coarse-resolution meteorological data often hinders accurate model-based renewable energy systems planning. Current assessments of the renewable energy potential and, subsequently, the design of renewable energy systems are typically based on coarse resolution reanalysis products such as ERA5 or MERRA-2. In this interdisciplinary study, we used the high-resolution validated meteorological data ICON-LAM from 2017 to 2019, based on physically consistent, atmospheric simulations with the ICON model, as an input to design cost-optimised renewable energy systems over southern Africa, and compare it to results obtained with ERA5 data. Higher wind energy potentials, averaging about 50 %, were found derived from ICON-LAM compared to ERA5, while solar energy potentials were similar. The cost-optimised energy system design using ICON-LAM inputs leads to a cost reduction of about 14 %, driven mainly by a 13 % lower battery capacity requirement, compared to using ERA5 – a result rooted in the cheaper wind energy revealed by ICON-LAM. This suggests that the cost of renewable energy systems may have been overestimated in the past, potentially hindering their efficient deployment. Hence, the study emphasises the importance of using high-resolution atmospheric modelling data sets as a decisive input for energy system planning.
Suggested Citation
Chen, Shuying & Goergen, Klaus & Hendricks Franssen, Harrie-Jan & Franzmann, David & Winkler, Christoph & Ishmam, Shitab & Poll, Stefan & Linssen, Jochen & Vereecken, Harry & Heinrichs, Heidi, 2026.
"High-resolution atmospheric modelling reveals lower costs for renewable energy systems in Southern Africa,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 342(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:342:y:2026:i:c:s0360544225052077
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.139565
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:342:y:2026:i:c:s0360544225052077. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.