IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v283y2023ics0360544223018017.html

Who Embraces shared mobility and why? A survey in Beijing and Shanghai, China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhao, Xingrong
  • Shao, Shuai
  • Ma, Ye
  • Ma, Tieju

Abstract

Shared mobility (SM) provides a feasible solution for reducing the private cars use. However, SM is not widely accepted in China's mobility market. Based on scenario choice experiments, we explore the potential user sources of SM and analyze the factors that influence users' choice of SM by comparing SM and traditional travel modes. First, we divide users into four categories based on their travel habits and examine heterogeneous users' travel inertia and preference differences for SM. Second, we use a discrete choice model to analyze the effects of demographic characteristics and travel attributes on users' mode choices. Third, we explore the potential user sources and the development potential of SM. The results indicate that Beijing has a greater positive potential for SM. To be specific, car users are the main potential users of SM in Beijing, while the primary source in Shanghai is bus users, implying that promoting SM may exacerbate the traffic congestion in Shanghai. Attribute analysis suggests that fewer transfers and more carpoolers are the two most important factors driving users to choose SM. Meanwhile, time-related attributes have a significant impact on bus users, and exorbitant parking fees will encourage car users to choose SM.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhao, Xingrong & Shao, Shuai & Ma, Ye & Ma, Tieju, 2023. "Who Embraces shared mobility and why? A survey in Beijing and Shanghai, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:283:y:2023:i:c:s0360544223018017
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.128407
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544223018017
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2023.128407?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yin, Xiang & Chen, Wenying & Eom, Jiyong & Clarke, Leon E. & Kim, Son H. & Patel, Pralit L. & Yu, Sha & Kyle, G. Page, 2015. "China's transportation energy consumption and CO2 emissions from a global perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 233-248.
    2. Di, Xuan & Ban, Xuegang Jeff, 2019. "A unified equilibrium framework of new shared mobility systems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 50-78.
    3. Yu, Biying & Ma, Ye & Xue, Meimei & Tang, Baojun & Wang, Bin & Yan, Jinyue & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2017. "Environmental benefits from ridesharing: A case of Beijing," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 141-152.
    4. Lai, Kexing & Chen, Tao & Natarajan, Balasubramaniam, 2020. "Optimal scheduling of electric vehicles car-sharing service with multi-temporal and multi-task operation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    5. Tirachini, Alejandro & del Río, Mariana, 2019. "Ride-hailing in Santiago de Chile: Users’ characterisation and effects on travel behaviour," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 46-57.
    6. Hassan, Syed Tauseef & Khan, Danish & Zhu, Bangzhu & Batool, Bushra, 2022. "Is public service transportation increase environmental contamination in China? The role of nuclear energy consumption and technological change," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PC).
    7. Chen, Zhenni & Du, Huibin & Li, Jianglong & Southworth, Frank & Ma, Shoufeng, 2019. "Achieving low-carbon urban passenger transport in China: Insights from the heterogeneous rebound effect," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 1029-1041.
    8. Burghard, Uta & Scherrer, Aline, 2022. "Sharing vehicles or sharing rides - Psychological factors influencing the acceptance of carsharing and ridepooling in Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    9. Ran, Cuiling & Zhang, Yanzi & Yin, Ying, 2021. "Demand response to improve the shared electric vehicle planning: Managerial insights, sustainable benefits," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    10. Hsieh, I-Yun Lisa & Pan, Menghsuan Sam & Green, William H., 2020. "Transition to electric vehicles in China: Implications for private motorization rate and battery market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    11. Lavieri, Patrícia S. & Bhat, Chandra R., 2019. "Modeling individuals’ willingness to share trips with strangers in an autonomous vehicle future," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 242-261.
    12. Gheorghiu, Alexandra & Delhomme, Patricia, 2018. "For which types of trips do French drivers carpool? Motivations underlying carpooling for different types of trips," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 460-475.
    13. Felipe F. Dias & Patrícia S. Lavieri & Venu M. Garikapati & Sebastian Astroza & Ram M. Pendyala & Chandra R. Bhat, 2017. "A behavioral choice model of the use of car-sharing and ride-sourcing services," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(6), pages 1307-1323, November.
    14. Shaheen, Susan & Cohen, Adam & Zohdy, Ismail & Kock, Beaudry, 2016. "Shared Mobility: Current Practices and Guiding Principles Brief," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt0gz3b3fx, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    15. Jifu Guo & Mingzheng Sun & Ting Wang & Lu Lu, 2015. "Transportation development and congestion mitigation measures of Beijing, China," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 20(5), pages 651-663, June.
    16. Brown, Anne E., 2020. "Who and where rideshares? Rideshare travel and use in Los Angeles," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 120-134.
    17. Yu Wang & Shanyong Wang & Jing Wang & Jiuchang Wei & Chenglin Wang, 2020. "An empirical study of consumers’ intention to use ride-sharing services: using an extended technology acceptance model," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 397-415, February.
    18. Wu, Tian & Shen, Qu & Xu, Ming & Peng, Tianduo & Ou, Xunmin, 2018. "Development and application of an energy use and CO2 emissions reduction evaluation model for China's online car hailing services," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 298-307.
    19. Alejandro Tirachini, 2020. "Ride-hailing, travel behaviour and sustainable mobility: an international review," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 2011-2047, August.
    20. Fan, Jing-Li & Wang, Jia-Xing & Zhang, Xian, 2020. "An innovative subsidy model for promoting the sharing of Electric Vehicles in China: A pricing decisions analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    21. Leroutier, Marion & Quirion, Philippe, 2022. "Air pollution and CO2 from daily mobility: Who emits and Why? Evidence from Paris," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guo, Zhangdong & Zhang, Xiaoning, 2024. "Has the healthy city pilot policy improved urban air quality in China? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ghimire, Subid & Bardaka, Eleni, 2025. "The role of system design attributes and community characteristics in microtransit use: Evidence from five microtransit systems," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    2. Sun, Yite & Liu, Xiaobing & Wang, Rui & Wang, Yun & Yan, Xuedong, 2025. "Nonlinear effects of built environment on ridesplitting ratio: Discrepancies across sharing motivations," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    3. Wu, Tian & Wang, Shouyang & Wang, Lining & Tang, Xiao, 2022. "Contribution of China's online car-hailing services to its 2050 carbon target: Energy consumption assessment based on the GCAM-SE model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    4. Kumar, Akshay & Gupta, Akshay & Parida, Manoranjan & Chauhan, Vivek, 2022. "Service quality assessment of ride-sourcing services: A distinction between ride-hailing and ride-sharing services," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 61-79.
    5. Hasnine, Md Sami & Hawkins, Jason & Habib, Khandker Nurul, 2021. "Effects of built environment and weather on demands for transportation network company trips," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 171-185.
    6. Soltani, Ali & Allan, Andrew & Khalaj, Fahimeh & Pojani, Dorina & Mehdizadeh, Milad, 2021. "Ridesharing in Adelaide: Segmentation of users," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    7. Anne Aguiléra & Eléonore Pigalle, 2021. "The Future and Sustainability of Carpooling Practices. An Identification of Research Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, October.
    8. Khaloei, Moein & Oshanreh, Mohammad Mehdi & Tu, Yuanjie & Gurumurthy, Krishna Murthy & MacKenzie, Don, 2026. "Automating ridehailing services would reduce pooling, especially among women," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    9. Wang, Hai & Yang, Hai, 2019. "Ridesourcing systems: A framework and review," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 122-155.
    10. Zhang, Xin & Zhong, Shiquan & Ling, Shuai & Jia, Ning & Qi, Hang & He, Zhengbing, 2022. "How to promote the transition from solo driving to mobility services delivery? An empirical study focusing on ridesharing," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 176-187.
    11. Ghimire, Subid & Bardaka, Eleni, 2025. "Examining the determinants of microtransit use and ridesharing based on trip microdata," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    12. Soria, Jason & Stathopoulos, Amanda, 2021. "Investigating socio-spatial differences between solo ridehailing and pooled rides in diverse communities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    13. Ong, Felita & Loa, Patrick & Nurul Habib, Khandker, 2024. "Ride-sourcing demand in Metro Vancouver: Looking through the lens of disability," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    14. Wårell, Linda & Ek, Kristina, 2024. "Male lone wolves and sociable females – Preferences for shared and AV transport services," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    15. Zheng, Zhicheng & Li, Yang & Rong, Peijun & Zhang, Lijun & Qin, Yaochen & Liu, Gangjun, 2025. "Spatio-temporal dynamic characteristics of the substitution effect of ride-hailing travel and its multi-activity network: a case study of Chengdu," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    16. Abouelela, Mohamed & Durán-Rodas, David & Antoniou, Constantinos, 2024. "Do we all need shared E-scooters? An accessibility-centered spatial equity evaluation approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    17. Vij, Akshay & Ryan, Stacey & Sampson, Spring & Harris, Susan, 2020. "Consumer preferences for on-demand transport in Australia," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 823-839.
    18. Noruzoliaee, Mohamadhossein & Zou, Bo, 2022. "One-to-many matching and section-based formulation of autonomous ridesharing equilibrium," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 72-100.
    19. Du, Mingyang & Cheng, Lin & Li, Xuefeng & Liu, Qiyang & Yang, Jingzong, 2022. "Spatial variation of ridesplitting adoption rate in Chicago," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 13-37.
    20. Ngoc, An Minh & Nishiuchi, Hiroaki, 2025. "Understanding travel patterns of ride-hailing service sub-population groups and effects of transit investment on ride-hailing users’ potential mode switching: A case study of Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 456-476.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:283:y:2023:i:c:s0360544223018017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.