IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/retrec/v110y2025ics0739885925000216.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What factors influence Chinese Women's nighttime ride-hailing preferences? An ICLV model analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Ke
  • Yao, Dongmin
  • Pei, Mingyang

Abstract

With the rapid development of the ride-hailing industry and the rise of the nighttime economy, nighttime travel has become a new norm for urban residents in China. However, the security issues faced by women when using ride-hailing services at night have become increasingly prominent. Although existing studies have explored various factors influencing women's transportation mode choices, there remains a gap in research specifically addressing ride-hailing choices from a gender perspective. Furthermore, the factors influencing women's willingness to travel at night are still not sufficiently detailed or comprehensive, lacking an in-depth exploration of ride-hailing as a transportation option. To address these issues, this paper employs an integrated choice and latent variable model (ICLV) that combines discrete choice models and latent variable models, offering a multidimensional analysis of both the explicit factors and the latent psychological factors influencing women's decisions to utilize ride-hailing services at night. The study uses extensive survey data from a diverse group of women across different ages, professions, incomes, and living conditions to ensure comprehensive and representative data. The results indicate that factors such as marital status, car ownership, and living conditions significantly affect women's travel decisions. High-income women and those in specific occupations exhibit a greater propensity to choose ride-hailing services, highlighting the impact of income and social status on travel mode choices. Notably, younger women display heightened sensitivity to psychological factors, such as perceived risk, pleasure, and security, in their nighttime ride-hailing choices. This research enhances understanding of gender differences in ride-hailing and emphasizes the need to improve security, driver quality, and regulations. It provides insights for ride-hailing platforms and transportation authorities to develop better strategies for women's nighttime travel, supporting the sustainable development of the ride-hailing industry, and promoting gender equality and women's mobility.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Ke & Yao, Dongmin & Pei, Mingyang, 2025. "What factors influence Chinese Women's nighttime ride-hailing preferences? An ICLV model analysis," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:retrec:v:110:y:2025:i:c:s0739885925000216
    DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2025.101538
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0739885925000216
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.retrec.2025.101538?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:osf:osfxxx:x7ryj_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Young, Mischa & Farber, Steven, 2019. "The who, why, and when of Uber and other ride-hailing trips: An examination of a large sample household travel survey," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 383-392.
    3. Jaime Allen & Laura Eboli & Gabriella Mazzulla & Juan de Dios Ortúzar, 2020. "Effect of critical incidents on public transport satisfaction and loyalty: an Ordinal Probit SEM-MIMIC approach," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 827-863, April.
    4. Mazzulla, Gabriella & Eboli, Laura & Forciniti, Carmen, 2024. "Do women perceive pedestrian path attractiveness differently from men?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    5. Young, Mischa & Farber, Steven, 2019. "The Who, Why, and When of Uber and other Ride-hailing Trips: An Examination of a Large Sample Household Travel Survey," OSF Preprints x7ryj, Center for Open Science.
    6. Kumar, Akshay & Gupta, Akshay & Parida, Manoranjan & Chauhan, Vivek, 2022. "Service quality assessment of ride-sourcing services: A distinction between ride-hailing and ride-sharing services," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 61-79.
    7. Vij, Akshay & Walker, Joan L., 2016. "How, when and why integrated choice and latent variable models are latently useful," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 192-217.
    8. Circella, Giovanni & Alemi, Farzad & Tiedeman, Kate & Handy, Susan & Mokhtarian, Patricia, 2018. "The Adoption of Shared Mobility in California and Its Relationship with Other Components of Travel Behavior," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt1kq5d07p, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    9. Maria Cucciniello & Greta Nasi, 2014. "Transparency for Trust in Government: How Effective is Formal Transparency?," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(13), pages 911-921, November.
    10. Kapuściński, Grzegorz & Richards, Barry, 2016. "News framing effects on destination risk perception," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 234-244.
    11. Shixingyue Hu & Yazao Yang, 2024. "Safety of female ride-hailing passengers: Perception and prevention," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    12. Wei-Shiuen Ng & Ashley Acker, 2020. "The Gender Dimension of the Transport Workforce," International Transport Forum Discussion Papers 2020/11, OECD Publishing.
    13. Celine Klemm & Enny Das & Tilo Hartmann, 2016. "Swine flu and hype: a systematic review of media dramatization of the H1N1 influenza pandemic," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 1-20, January.
    14. Feng, Zhongxiang & Gao, Ya & Zhu, Dianchen & Chan, Ho-Yin & Zhao, Mingming & Xue, Rui, 2024. "Impact of risk perception and trust in autonomous vehicles on pedestrian crossing decision: Navigating the social-technological intersection with the ICLV model," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 71-86.
    15. Chowdhury, Subeh & van Wee, Bert, 2020. "Examining women's perception of safety during waiting times at public transport terminals," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 102-108.
    16. Alejandro Tirachini, 2020. "Ride-hailing, travel behaviour and sustainable mobility: an international review," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 2011-2047, August.
    17. Laila Ait Bihi Ouali & Daniel J. Graham & Alexander Barron & Mark Trompet, 2020. "Gender differences in the perception of safety in public transport," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 183(3), pages 737-769, June.
    18. Stevens, Jennifer L. & Spaid, Brian I. & Breazeale, Michael & Esmark Jones, Carol L., 2018. "Timeliness, transparency, and trust: A framework for managing online customer complaints," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(3), pages 375-384.
    19. Giacomantonio, Sarah & Mitra, Raktim & Ravensbergen, Léa, 2024. "Bicycle facilities and women's cycling frequency – An intersectional analysis of gendered travel behaviour," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    20. Chen, Aihui & Lu, Yaobin, 2021. "Protective behavior in ride-sharing through the lens of protection motivation theory and usage situation theory," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    21. Yang, Elaine Chiao Ling & Khoo-Lattimore, Catheryn & Arcodia, Charles, 2017. "A systematic literature review of risk and gender research in tourism," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 89-100.
    22. Pierluigi Coppola & Fulvio Silvestri, 2021. "Gender Inequality in Safety and Security Perceptions in Railway Stations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-15, April.
    23. Tirachini, Alejandro & del Río, Mariana, 2019. "Ride-hailing in Santiago de Chile: Users’ characterisation and effects on travel behaviour," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 46-57.
    24. Noor, Shamim & Iamtrakul, Pawinee, 2023. "Women's access to urban public transport: Toward addressing policy constraints in combating sexual harassment," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 14-22.
    25. Anuradha Joshi, 2013. "Do They Work? Assessing the Impact of Transparency and Accountability Initiatives in Service Delivery," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 31, pages 29-48, July.
    26. Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen & Peter John & Albert Meijer & Ben Worthy, 2019. "Do Freedom of Information Laws increase transparency of government? A replication of a field experiment," Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, Center for Experimental and Behavioral Public Administration, vol. 2(1).
    27. Carolyn Whitzman, 2007. "Stuck at the Front Door: Gender, Fear of Crime and the Challenge of Creating Safer Space," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(11), pages 2715-2732, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ho, Chinh Q. & Tirachini, Alejandro, 2024. "Mobility-as-a-Service and the role of multimodality in the sustainability of urban mobility in developing and developed countries," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 161-176.
    2. Shixingyue Hu & Yazao Yang, 2024. "Safety of female ride-hailing passengers: Perception and prevention," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Xiong, Ziyue & Jian Li, & Wu, Hangbin, 2021. "Understanding operation patterns of urban online ride-hailing services: A case study of Xiamen," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 100-118.
    4. Alejandro Tirachini, 2020. "Ride-hailing, travel behaviour and sustainable mobility: an international review," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 2011-2047, August.
    5. Yicong Yang & Carolyn McAndrews, 2025. "Gender gaps in ride-hail use in U.S. metropolitan areas," Transportation, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 715-739, April.
    6. Young, Mischa & Allen, Jeff & Farber, Steven, 2020. "Measuring when Uber behaves as a substitute or supplement to transit: An examination of travel-time differences in Toronto," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    7. Ghazaleh Azimi & Alireza Rahimi & Xia Jin, 2022. "Exploring the attitudes of Millennials and Generation Xers toward ridesourcing services," Transportation, Springer, vol. 49(6), pages 1765-1799, December.
    8. Zheng, Yunhan & Meredith-Karam, Patrick & Stewart, Anson & Kong, Hui & Zhao, Jinhua, 2023. "Impacts of congestion pricing on ride-hailing ridership: Evidence from Chicago," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    9. Nur Oktaviani Widiastuti & Muhammad Zudhy Irawan, 2024. "Ride-Hailing Preferences for First- and Last-Mile Connectivity at Intercity Transit Hubs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-20, April.
    10. Muhamad Rizki & Tri Basuki Joewono & Dimas Bayu Endrayana Dharmowijoyo & Dwi Prasetyanto, 2021. "The Effects of On- and Before- Journey Advantages Using Ride-Sourcing in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-20, October.
    11. Ong, Felita & Loa, Patrick & Nurul Habib, Khandker, 2024. "Ride-sourcing demand in Metro Vancouver: Looking through the lens of disability," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    12. Rezwana Rafiq & Michael G. McNally, 2023. "An exploratory analysis of alternative travel behaviors of ride-hailing users," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 571-605, April.
    13. Tirachini, Alejandro & del Río, Mariana, 2019. "Ride-hailing in Santiago de Chile: Users’ characterisation and effects on travel behaviour," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 46-57.
    14. Nejc Geržinič & Niels Oort & Sascha Hoogendoorn-Lanser & Oded Cats & Serge Hoogendoorn, 2023. "Potential of on-demand services for urban travel," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 1289-1321, August.
    15. Kim, Sung Hoo & Mokhtarian, Patricia L., 2024. "Latent class choice models with an error structure: Investigating potential unobserved associations between latent segmentation and behavior generation," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    16. Pierluigi Coppola & Fulvio Silvestri, 2021. "Gender Inequality in Safety and Security Perceptions in Railway Stations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-15, April.
    17. Ting Wang & Yong Zhang & Meiye Li & Lei Liu, 2019. "How Do Passengers with Different Using Frequencies Choose between Traditional Taxi Service and Online Car-Hailing Service? A Case Study of Nanjing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-18, November.
    18. Agrawal, David R. & Zhao, Weihua, 2023. "Taxing Uber," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    19. Brown, Anne, 2022. "Not all fees are created equal: Equity implications of ride-hail fee structures and revenues," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 1-10.
    20. Ahmad Nazrul Hakimi Ibrahim & Muhamad Nazri Borhan & Nur Izzi Md. Yusoff & Amiruddin Ismail & Muhamad Razuhanafi Mat Yazid & Nor Aznirahani Mhd Yunin & Sotaro Yukawa, 2021. "Gender and Age Do Matter: Exploring the Effect of Passengers’ Gender and Age on the Perception of Light Rail Transit Service Quality in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-18, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C25 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Discrete Regression and Qualitative Choice Models; Discrete Regressors; Proportions; Probabilities

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:retrec:v:110:y:2025:i:c:s0739885925000216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/620614/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.