IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v165y2018ipap562-571.html

Rural households' willingness to accept compensation for energy utilization of crop straw in China

Author

Listed:
  • He, Ke
  • Zhang, Junbiao
  • Zeng, Yangmei

Abstract

Many studies have investigated energy utilization of crop straw; however, there has been little analysis in the literature from the perspective of willingness to accept compensation. This study is one of the first studies to introduce the variable trust into the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology, and it mainly the factors influencing rural households' willingness to accept compensation for energy utilization of crop straw. The results show that a certain amount of compensation—approximately 0.95%–1.62% of the average family annual income —encourages households to participate in energy utilization of crop straw. This means that a reasonable compensation standard is an important means of coordinating the relationship between economic development and protection of the natural environment. This paper also finds that, in addition to the factors (time cost expectation, economic cost expectation, influence from persons with high education, influence from persons with high income) in the original Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology model, trust in neighbors, as one aspect of the interpersonal trust, and trust in village cadres, as one aspect of the institutional trust, all exert a significant influence on rural households' willingness to accept. This paper therefore recommends linking energy utilization of crop straw to broader attempts to strengthen trust.

Suggested Citation

  • He, Ke & Zhang, Junbiao & Zeng, Yangmei, 2018. "Rural households' willingness to accept compensation for energy utilization of crop straw in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PA), pages 562-571.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:165:y:2018:i:pa:p:562-571
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.09.023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544218317833
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2018.09.023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Godwin Udo & Kallol Bagchi & Moutusy Maity, 2016. "Exploring Factors Affecting Digital Piracy Using the Norm Activation and UTAUT Models: The Role of National Culture," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(3), pages 517-541, May.
    2. Chen, Yu & Hu, Wei & Chen, Paul & Ruan, Roger, 2017. "Household biogas CDM project development in rural China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 184-191.
    3. Ceglarz, Andrzej & Beneking, Andreas & Ellenbeck, Saskia & Battaglini, Antonella, 2017. "Understanding the role of trust in power line development projects: Evidence from two case studies in Norway," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 570-580.
    4. Jan, Inayatullah & Akram, Waqar, 2018. "Willingness of rural communities to adopt biogas systems in Pakistan: Critical factors and policy implications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 3178-3185.
    5. Srinuanpan, Sirasit & Cheirsilp, Benjamas & Prasertsan, Poonsuk, 2018. "Effective biogas upgrading and production of biodiesel feedstocks by strategic cultivation of oleaginous microalgae," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 766-774.
    6. Abbas, Tahir & Ali, Ghaffar & Adil, Sultan Ali & Bashir, Muhammad Khalid & Kamran, Muhammad Asif, 2017. "Economic analysis of biogas adoption technology by rural farmers: The case of Faisalabad district in Pakistan," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 431-439.
    7. Montero, Gisela & Coronado, Marcos A. & Torres, Ricardo & Jaramillo, Beatriz E. & García, Conrado & Stoytcheva, Margarita & Vázquez, Ana M. & León, José A. & Lambert, Alejandro A. & Valenzuela, Edgar, 2016. "Higher heating value determination of wheat straw from Baja California, Mexico," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 612-619.
    8. Godwin Udo & Kallol Bagchi & Moutusy Maity, 2016. "Erratum to: Exploring Factors Affecting Digital Piracy Using the Norm Activation and UTAUT Models: The Role of National Culture," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(3), pages 605-605, May.
    9. Radner, Roy & Rothschild, Michael, 1975. "On the allocation of effort," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 358-376, June.
    10. Shadbahr, Jalil & Zhang, Yan & Khan, Faisal & Hawboldt, Kelly, 2018. "Multi-objective optimization of simultaneous saccharification and fermentation for cellulosic ethanol production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 100-107.
    11. Ke He & Junbiao Zhang & Junhui Feng & Ting Hu & Lu Zhang, 2016. "The Impact of Social Capital on farmers' Willingness to Reuse Agricultural Waste for Sustainable Development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(2), pages 101-108, March.
    12. James Heckman, 2013. "Sample selection bias as a specification error," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 31(3), pages 129-137.
    13. Kan, Xiang & Zhou, Dezhi & Yang, Wenming & Zhai, Xiaoqiang & Wang, Chi-Hwa, 2018. "An investigation on utilization of biogas and syngas produced from biomass waste in premixed spark ignition engine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 210-222.
    14. G. Cornelis Kooten, 2017. "FELLOWS ADDRESS California Dreaming: The Economics of Renewable Energy," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 65(1), pages 19-41, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kresimir Zigic & Jiri Strelicky & Michal Kunin, 2020. "Private and Public IPR Protection in a Vertically Differentiated Software Duopoly," CERGE-EI Working Papers wp671, The Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education - Economics Institute, Prague.
    2. Jabeen, Gul & Yan, Qingyou & Ahmad, Munir & Fatima, Nousheen & Jabeen, Maria & Li, Heng & Qamar, Shoaib, 2020. "Household-based critical influence factors of biogas generation technology utilization: A case of Punjab province of Pakistan," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 650-660.
    3. Dan Wu & Guofang Nan & Minqiang Li, 2020. "Optimal Piracy Control: Should a Firm Implement Digital Rights Management?," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 947-960, August.
    4. Ahmar, Muhammad & Ali, Fahad & He, Chengying & Jiang, Yuexiang, 2025. "Understanding the role of socio-economic, demographic, environmental, infrastructural, and institutional attributes in the uptake of biogas technology in Pakistan: Proposing and implementing a novel s," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    5. Shaheer, Noman & Tang, Ryan W. & Yang, Jing Yu, 2025. "The culprit behind bootleg music: The diverging roles of formal and informal institutions," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(3).
    6. Syed M Amir & Yonggong Liu & Ashfaq A Shah & Umer Khayyam & Zafar Mahmood, 2020. "Empirical study on influencing factors of biogas technology adoption in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan," Energy & Environment, , vol. 31(2), pages 308-329, March.
    7. Ahmad, Wasim & Kim, Woo Gon & Choi, Hyung-Min & Haq, Junaid Ul, 2021. "Modeling behavioral intention to use travel reservation apps: A cross-cultural examination between US and China," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    8. Chanhee Kwak & Junyeong Lee & Heeseok Lee, 2022. "Could You Ever Forget Me? Why People Want to be Forgotten Online," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(1), pages 25-42, August.
    9. Elena Higueras-Castillo & Vedant Singh & Virender Singh & Francisco Liébana-Cabanillas, 2024. "Factors affecting adoption intention of electric vehicle: a cross-cultural study," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(11), pages 29293-29329, November.
    10. Jaime Díaz-Arancibia & Jorge Hochstetter-Diez & Ana Bustamante-Mora & Samuel Sepúlveda-Cuevas & Isidora Albayay & Jeferson Arango-López, 2024. "Navigating Digital Transformation and Technology Adoption: A Literature Review from Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-31, July.
    11. Ashenafi Getaneh & Kasahun Eba & Gudina Terefe Tucho, 2024. "Assessment of Biomass Energy Potential for Biogas Technology Adoption and Its Determinant Factors in Rural District of Limmu Kossa, Jimma, Ethiopia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-15, May.
    12. José Roberto Díaz-Reza & Jorge Luis García-Alcaraz & José Roberto Mendoza-Fong & Valeria Martínez-Loya & Emilio Jiménez Macías & Julio Blanco-Fernández, 2017. "Interrelations among SMED Stages: A Causal Model," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-10, August.
    13. Kos Koklic, Mateja & Kukar-Kinney, Monika & Vida, Irena, 2022. "Consumers’ de-ownership as a predictor of dark-side digital acquisition behavior: Moderating role of moral intensity and collectivism," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 108-116.
    14. Roubík, Hynek & Mazancová, Jana & Rydval, Jan & Kvasnička, Roman, 2020. "Uncovering the dynamic complexity of the development of small–scale biogas technology through causal loops," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 235-243.
    15. Žigić, Krešimir & Střelický, Jiří & Kúnin, Michael, 2023. "Copyright and firms’ own IPR protection in a software market: Monopoly versus duopoly," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    16. Li, Yanjiao & Qing, Chen & Zhou, Wenfeng & Xu, Dingde, 2025. "Exploring the role of environmental regulations in biogas development in China, from the perspective of peer effect," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    17. Zanxin Wang & Saqib Ali & Ahsan Akbar & Farhan Rasool, 2020. "Determining the Influencing Factors of Biogas Technology Adoption Intention in Pakistan: The Moderating Role of Social Media," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-20, March.
    18. Susan (Sixue) Jia & Jiaying Ding, 2024. "Will Customers’ Understanding of the Trolley Dilemma Hinder Their Adoption of Robotaxi?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-18, April.
    19. Wang, Yi-Jia & Wang, Yue & Huang, George Q. & Lin, Ciyun, 2024. "Public acceptance of crowdsourced delivery from a customer perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 317(3), pages 793-805.
    20. Mukeshimana, Marie Claire & Zhao, Zhen-Yu & Ahmad, Munir & Irfan, Muhammad, 2021. "Analysis on barriers to biogas dissemination in Rwanda: AHP approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1127-1137.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:165:y:2018:i:pa:p:562-571. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.