IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/intman/v31y2025i3s1075425325000158.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The culprit behind bootleg music: The diverging roles of formal and informal institutions

Author

Listed:
  • Shaheer, Noman
  • Tang, Ryan W.
  • Yang, Jing Yu

Abstract

We revisit the roles of institutional environments in deterring ethically questionable activities conducted through digital channels, focusing on the release of digital bootleg music across countries. Whereas stronger digital regulations aim to deter such activities, we submit that informal institutions in some countries may diverge from formal regulations, creating demand-side opportunities that attract digital bootleggers. This divergence is further intensified in countries with high levels of digital usage, where advanced technological tools enable users to bypass regulatory barriers and access bootlegged content. Consequently, increasing digital usage intensifies the divergence between formal and informal institutions, undermining the effectiveness of digital regulations. Using a large dataset on bootleg music releases across 82 countries, we find empirical support for our theoretical contentions.

Suggested Citation

  • Shaheer, Noman & Tang, Ryan W. & Yang, Jing Yu, 2025. "The culprit behind bootleg music: The diverging roles of formal and informal institutions," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(3).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:intman:v:31:y:2025:i:3:s1075425325000158
    DOI: 10.1016/j.intman.2025.101237
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075425325000158
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.intman.2025.101237?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:intman:v:31:y:2025:i:3:s1075425325000158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/601266/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.