A plant-specific bottom-up approach for assessing the cost-effective energy conservation potential and its ability to compensate rising energy-related costs in the German iron and steel industry
Germany produces more steel than any other European country (42.7Mt steel in 2012). The steel production accounts for 22% of Germany's final industrial energy consumption. We assessed the potential of 32 identified energy conservation measures by deriving fuel, electricity and CO2 conservation cost curves. We developed a methodology which respects the current efficiency of individual plants and two different system boundaries: a process boundary for benchmarking measures and a facility boundary for calculating the total energy conservation potential. With moderate electricity and carbon price developments for the investigation period 2013–2035, the cost-effective conservation potentials are estimated to be 11.7% for fuel, 2.2% for electricity and 12.2% for fuel and process-related CO2 emissions compared to the industry's final energy use and CO2 emissions in 2012. For the sensitivity analysis, we varied electricity and carbon prices and our results showed that adopting cost-effective energy conservation measures can compensate for rising energy prices but the extent differs between the production routes. While the EAF route could compensate up to 50% higher electricity prices, the options for the BF/BOF route to reduce the fossil fuel consumption are limited. Thus, the energy-related production costs of the BF/BOF route increased in average by 6–13% between 2013 and 2035.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Hasanbeigi, Ali & Morrow, William & Sathaye, Jayant & Masanet, Eric & Xu, Tengfang, 2013. "A bottom-up model to estimate the energy efficiency improvement and CO2 emission reduction potentials in the Chinese iron and steel industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 315-325.
- Tanaka, Kanako, 2008. "Assessment of energy efficiency performance measures in industry and their application for policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 2877-2892, August.
- Guo, Z.C. & Fu, Z.X., 2010. "Current situation of energy consumption and measures taken for energy saving in the iron and steel industry in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(11), pages 4356-4360.
- Arens, Marlene & Worrell, Ernst & Schleich, Joachim, 2012.
"Energy intensity development of the German iron and steel industry between 1991 and 2007,"
Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 786-797.
- Marlene Arens & Ernst Worrell & Joachim Schleich, 2012. "Energy Intensity Development of the German Iron and Steel Industry between 1991 and 2007," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-00805730, HAL.
- Pardo, Nicolás & Moya, José Antonio, 2013. "Prospective scenarios on energy efficiency and CO2 emissions in the European Iron & Steel industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 113-128.
- Tanaka, Kanako, 2012. "A comparison study of EU and Japan methods to assess CO2 emission reduction and energy saving in the iron and steel industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 578-585.
- Taylor, J. H., 1977. "The 'process step scoring' method for making quick capital estimates," Engineering and Process Economics, Elsevier, vol. 2(4), pages 259-267, November.
- Hasanbeigi, Ali & Morrow, William & Masanet, Eric & Sathaye, Jayant & Xu, Tengfang, 2013. "Energy efficiency improvement and CO2 emission reduction opportunities in the cement industry in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 287-297.
- McKane, Aimee & Hasanbeigi, Ali, 2011. "Motor systems energy efficiency supply curves: A methodology for assessing the energy efficiency potential of industrial motor systems," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(10), pages 6595-6607, October.
- Oda, Junichiro & Akimoto, Keigo & Sano, Fuminori & Tomoda, Toshimasa, 2007. "Diffusion of energy efficient technologies and CO2 emission reductions in iron and steel sector," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 868-888, July.
- Fleiter, Tobias & Worrell, Ernst & Eichhammer, Wolfgang, 2011. "Barriers to energy efficiency in industrial bottom-up energy demand models--A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(6), pages 3099-3111, August.
- Bisio, G. & Rubatto, G., 2000. "Energy saving and some environment improvements in coke-oven plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 247-265.
- Siitonen, Sari & Tuomaala, Mari & Ahtila, Pekka, 2010. "Variables affecting energy efficiency and CO2 emissions in the steel industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 2477-2485, May.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:67:y:2014:i:c:p:431-446. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Zhang, Lei)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.