IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v203y2025ics0301421525001302.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A qualitative analysis of consumer motivations and barriers towards active smart meter utilization

Author

Listed:
  • Thunshirn, Philipp
  • Mlinaric, Ines
  • Berg, Jana

Abstract

Smart meter technology provides a range of benefits to residential endusers from reducing their energy consumption, increase renewable energy deployment and generate cost savings. Although the infrastructure in Vienna, Austria, is nearly fully deployed, the active utilization of smart meter functionalities, which is key to leverage its full potential, remains poor. This research explores motivational factors and barriers using qualitative data from 26 semi-structured interviews conducted in Vienna, Austria. In general, the willingness to use smart meters is high; however, awareness about their functionalities is low. Besides well-known factors of pro-environmental behavior and cost-savings analyzed in available literature, our results point out the relevance of self-determination, which is key for utilization. On the other side, information decifit, cognitive load, risk-aversion, have been identified as key barriers to utilization. Based on our results, we compare the findings to other countries with different rollout strategies. Finally, practical policy recommendations are discussed to increase active smart meter utilization.

Suggested Citation

  • Thunshirn, Philipp & Mlinaric, Ines & Berg, Jana, 2025. "A qualitative analysis of consumer motivations and barriers towards active smart meter utilization," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:203:y:2025:i:c:s0301421525001302
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114623
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525001302
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114623?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Burchell, Kevin & Rettie, Ruth & Roberts, Tom C., 2016. "Householder engagement with energy consumption feedback: the role of community action and communications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 178-186.
    2. Chamaret, Cécile & Steyer, Véronique & Mayer, Julie C., 2020. "“Hands off my meter!” when municipalities resist smart meters: Linking arguments and degrees of resistance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    3. Yash Chawla & Anna Kowalska-Pyzalska, 2019. "Public Awareness and Consumer Acceptance of Smart Meters among Polish Social Media Users," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-27, July.
    4. Zander, Kerstin K., 2020. "Unrealised opportunities for residential solar panels in Australia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    5. Christine Milchram & Geerten Van de Kaa & Neelke Doorn & Rolf Künneke, 2018. "Moral Values as Factors for Social Acceptance of Smart Grid Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-23, August.
    6. Tushar, Wayes & Yuen, Chau & Saha, Tapan K. & Morstyn, Thomas & Chapman, Archie C. & Alam, M. Jan E. & Hanif, Sarmad & Poor, H. Vincent, 2021. "Peer-to-peer energy systems for connected communities: A review of recent advances and emerging challenges," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    7. Gosnell, Greer & McCoy, Daire, 2023. "Market failures and willingness to accept smart meters: Experimental evidence from the UK," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    8. Hargreaves, Tom & Nye, Michael & Burgess, Jacquelin, 2010. "Making energy visible: A qualitative field study of how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 6111-6119, October.
    9. Roberts, Mike B. & Sharma, Arijit & MacGill, Iain, 2022. "Efficient, effective and fair allocation of costs and benefits in residential energy communities deploying shared photovoltaics," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    10. Good, Nicholas & Ellis, Keith A. & Mancarella, Pierluigi, 2017. "Review and classification of barriers and enablers of demand response in the smart grid," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 57-72.
    11. Azarova, Valeriya & Cohen, Jed & Friedl, Christina & Reichl, Johannes, 2019. "Designing local renewable energy communities to increase social acceptance: Evidence from a choice experiment in Austria, Germany, Italy, and Switzerland," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1176-1183.
    12. Schleich, Joachim & Klobasa, Marian & Gölz, Sebastian & Brunner, Marc, 2013. "Effects of feedback on residential electricity demand—Findings from a field trial in Austria," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 1097-1106.
    13. Alejandro Moreno & Asta Bareisaite, 2015. "Scaling Up Access to Electricity : Pay-as-You-Go Plans in Off-Grid Energy Services," World Bank Publications - Reports 21360, The World Bank Group.
    14. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    15. Haider, Haider Tarish & See, Ong Hang & Elmenreich, Wilfried, 2016. "A review of residential demand response of smart grid," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 166-178.
    16. Schallehn, Frauke & Valogianni, Konstantina, 2022. "Sustainability awareness and smart meter privacy concerns: The cases of US and Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    17. Filip Tokarski & Mohammad Akbarpour & Scott Duke Kominers & Piotr Dworczak, 2023. "A market-design response to the European energy crisis," GRAPE Working Papers 81, GRAPE Group for Research in Applied Economics.
    18. Buchanan, Kathryn & Banks, Nick & Preston, Ian & Russo, Riccardo, 2016. "The British public’s perception of the UK smart metering initiative: Threats and opportunities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 87-97.
    19. Penelope Buckley, 2021. "A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies on Residential Consumer Experience with Smart Meters and Dynamic Pricing," Post-Print hal-03335199, HAL.
    20. Krishnamurti, Tamar & Schwartz, Daniel & Davis, Alexander & Fischhoff, Baruch & de Bruin, Wändi Bruine & Lave, Lester & Wang, Jack, 2012. "Preparing for smart grid technologies: A behavioral decision research approach to understanding consumer expectations about smart meters," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 790-797.
    21. Mi, Lingyun & Gan, Xiaoli & Sun, Yuhuan & Lv, Tao & Qiao, Lijie & Xu, Ting, 2021. "Effects of monetary and nonmonetary interventions on energy conservation: A meta-analysis of experimental studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    22. Shariatzadeh, Farshid & Mandal, Paras & Srivastava, Anurag K., 2015. "Demand response for sustainable energy systems: A review, application and implementation strategy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 343-350.
    23. Christensen, Toke Haunstrup & Friis, Freja & Bettin, Steffen & Throndsen, William & Ornetzeder, Michael & Skjølsvold, Tomas Moe & Ryghaug, Marianne, 2020. "The role of competences, engagement, and devices in configuring the impact of prices in energy demand response: Findings from three smart energy pilots with households," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    24. Siddharth Sareen, 2020. "Social and technical differentiation in smart meter rollout: embedded scalar biases in automating Norwegian and Portuguese energy infrastructure," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-8, December.
    25. Yash Chawla & Anna Kowalska-Pyzalska & Burcu Oralhan, 2020. "Attitudes and Opinions of Social Media Users Towards Smart Meters’ Rollout in Turkey," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-27, February.
    26. Sudarshan, Anant, 2017. "Nudges in the marketplace: The response of household electricity consumption to information and monetary incentives," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 320-335.
    27. Angela Ramnarine Rieks & Jason Dedrick & Jeffrey Stanton, 2020. "Risks, benefits, and control of information: Two studies of smart electric meter privacy," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(9), pages 1060-1073, September.
    28. Olmos, Luis & Ruester, Sophia & Liong, Siok-Jen & Glachant, Jean-Michel, 2011. "Energy efficiency actions related to the rollout of smart meters for small consumers, application to the Austrian system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 4396-4409.
    29. Françoise Simon & Virginie Schweitzer, 2023. "When smart meters backfire on energy transition internalization: Ethical electricity suppliers' mitigation of consumer data vulnerability and attendant psychological disempowerment," Post-Print hal-04185026, HAL.
    30. Sousa, Tiago & Soares, Tiago & Pinson, Pierre & Moret, Fabio & Baroche, Thomas & Sorin, Etienne, 2019. "Peer-to-peer and community-based markets: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 367-378.
    31. Antti Silvast & Robin Williams & Sampsa Hyysalo & Kjetil Rommetveit & Charles Raab, 2018. "Who ‘Uses’ Smart Grids? The Evolving Nature of User Representations in Layered Infrastructures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-21, October.
    32. Fabra, Natalia, 2023. "Reforming European electricity markets: Lessons from the energy crisis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    33. McKenna, Eoghan & Richardson, Ian & Thomson, Murray, 2012. "Smart meter data: Balancing consumer privacy concerns with legitimate applications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 807-814.
    34. Yash Chawla & Anna Kowalska-Pyzalska & Widayat Widayat, 2019. "Consumer Willingness and Acceptance of Smart Meters in Indonesia," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-23, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Kowalska-Pyzalska & Katarzyna Byrka & Jakub Serek, 2020. "How to Foster the Adoption of Electricity Smart Meters? A Longitudinal Field Study of Residential Consumers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    2. Valor, Carmen & Escudero, Carmen & Labajo, Victoria & Cossent, Rafael, 2019. "Effective design of domestic energy efficiency displays: A proposed architecture based on empirical evidence," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Kowalska-Pyzalska, Anna, 2018. "What makes consumers adopt to innovative energy services in the energy market? A review of incentives and barriers," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 3570-3581.
    4. Nilsson, Anders & Bartusch, Cajsa, 2024. "Empowered or enchained? Exploring consumer perspectives on Direct Load Control," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    5. Yash Chawla & Anna Kowalska-Pyzalska & Burcu Oralhan, 2020. "Attitudes and Opinions of Social Media Users Towards Smart Meters’ Rollout in Turkey," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-27, February.
    6. Chawla, Yash & Kowalska-Pyzalska, Anna & Skowrońska-Szmer, Anna, 2020. "Perspectives of smart meters’ roll-out in India: An empirical analysis of consumers’ awareness and preferences," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    7. Zahra Fallahi & Gregor P. Henze, 2019. "Interactive Buildings: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-26, July.
    8. Yash Chawla & Anna Kowalska-Pyzalska, 2019. "Public Awareness and Consumer Acceptance of Smart Meters among Polish Social Media Users," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-27, July.
    9. Anna Kowalska-Pyzalska & Katarzyna Byrka, 2019. "Determinants of the Willingness to Energy Monitoring by Residential Consumers: A Case Study in the City of Wroclaw in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, March.
    10. Buchanan, Kathryn & Banks, Nick & Preston, Ian & Russo, Riccardo, 2016. "The British public’s perception of the UK smart metering initiative: Threats and opportunities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 87-97.
    11. Yash Chawla & Anna Kowalska-Pyzalska & Widayat Widayat, 2019. "Consumer Willingness and Acceptance of Smart Meters in Indonesia," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-23, November.
    12. Charbonnier, Flora & Morstyn, Thomas & McCulloch, Malcolm D., 2022. "Coordination of resources at the edge of the electricity grid: Systematic review and taxonomy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 318(C).
    13. Märkle-Huß, Joscha & Feuerriegel, Stefan & Neumann, Dirk, 2018. "Large-scale demand response and its implications for spot prices, load and policies: Insights from the German-Austrian electricity market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 1290-1298.
    14. Nizami, Sohrab & Tushar, Wayes & Hossain, M.J. & Yuen, Chau & Saha, Tapan & Poor, H. Vincent, 2022. "Transactive energy for low voltage residential networks: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    15. Gjorgievski, Vladimir Z. & Cundeva, Snezana & Markovska, Natasa & Georghiou, George E., 2022. "Virtual net-billing: A fair energy sharing method for collective self-consumption," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PB).
    16. Strong, Derek Ryan, 2017. "The Early Diffusion of Smart Meters in the US Electric Power Industry," Thesis Commons 7zprk, Center for Open Science.
    17. Antoine Boche & Clément Foucher & Luiz Fernando Lavado Villa, 2022. "Understanding Microgrid Sustainability: A Systemic and Comprehensive Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-29, April.
    18. Chamaret, Cécile & Steyer, Véronique & Mayer, Julie C., 2020. "“Hands off my meter!” when municipalities resist smart meters: Linking arguments and degrees of resistance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    19. Yildiz, B. & Bilbao, J.I. & Dore, J. & Sproul, A.B., 2017. "Recent advances in the analysis of residential electricity consumption and applications of smart meter data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 402-427.
    20. Mitridati, Lesia & Kazempour, Jalal & Pinson, Pierre, 2021. "Design and game-Theoretic analysis of community-Based market mechanisms in heat and electricity systems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:203:y:2025:i:c:s0301421525001302. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.