IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04185026.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

When smart meters backfire on energy transition internalization: Ethical electricity suppliers' mitigation of consumer data vulnerability and attendant psychological disempowerment

Author

Listed:
  • Françoise Simon

    (CREGO - Centre de Recherche en Gestion des Organisations - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) Mulhouse - Colmar - UB - Université de Bourgogne - UBFC - Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté [COMUE] - UFC - Université de Franche-Comté - UBFC - Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté [COMUE])

  • Virginie Schweitzer

    (CREGO - Centre de Recherche en Gestion des Organisations - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) Mulhouse - Colmar - UB - Université de Bourgogne - UBFC - Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté [COMUE] - UFC - Université de Franche-Comté - UBFC - Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté [COMUE])

Abstract

Policymakers and electricity suppliers are pursuing systematic strategies to install smart meters, replacing traditional meters in households, to improve the functioning of the smart grid and help consumers save energy by accessing detailed, real-time feedback on their energy consumption. Drawing on Self-Determination Theory, this paper develops a model of the process of consumer disempowerment associated with smart meter-induced data vulnerability. This process ultimately leads to the erosion of consumers' internalization of energy transition goals through the mediation of their perceived competency in using the device. Several aspects of electricity supplier behavior that could reduce the negative effects of smart meter-induced data vulnerability are explored, including managing data transparency in a relational way, ensuring fairness in the exchange with the customer, and avoiding pricing personalization based on the customer's private data. A quantitative survey conducted in France validated this model. Overall, this study contributes to the literature on customer data vulnerability and enriches the understanding of smart meter acceptability by identifying potential drawbacks of feedback-based smart devices for sustainable consumption. It also outlines how companies should engage in ethical practices when deploying smart technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Françoise Simon & Virginie Schweitzer, 2023. "When smart meters backfire on energy transition internalization: Ethical electricity suppliers' mitigation of consumer data vulnerability and attendant psychological disempowerment," Post-Print hal-04185026, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04185026
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122738
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://ube.hal.science/hal-04185026v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ube.hal.science/hal-04185026v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122738?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Valerie Good & Douglas E. Hughes & Ahmet H. Kirca & Sean McGrath, 2022. "A self-determination theory-based meta-analysis on the differential effects of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on salesperson performance," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 586-614, May.
    2. Chamaret, Cécile & Steyer, Véronique & Mayer, Julie C., 2020. "“Hands off my meter!” when municipalities resist smart meters: Linking arguments and degrees of resistance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    3. Hilary S. Boudet, 2019. "Public perceptions of and responses to new energy technologies," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 4(6), pages 446-455, June.
    4. Peter Seele & Claus Dierksmeier & Reto Hofstetter & Mario D. Schultz, 2021. "Mapping the Ethicality of Algorithmic Pricing: A Review of Dynamic and Personalized Pricing," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 170(4), pages 697-719, May.
    5. Buchanan, Kathryn & Banks, Nick & Preston, Ian & Russo, Riccardo, 2016. "The British public’s perception of the UK smart metering initiative: Threats and opportunities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 87-97.
    6. Simon, Françoise & Tossan, Vesselina, 2018. "Does brand-consumer social sharing matter? A relational framework of customer engagement to brand-hosted social media," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 175-184.
    7. Riegger, Anne-Sophie & Klein, Jan F. & Merfeld, Katrin & Henkel, Sven, 2021. "Technology-enabled personalization in retail stores: Understanding drivers and barriers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 140-155.
    8. Hanna Mela & Juha Peltomaa & Marja Salo & Kirsi Mäkinen & Mikael Hildén, 2018. "Framing Smart Meter Feedback in Relation to Practice Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-22, October.
    9. Richter, Laura-Lucia & Pollitt, Michael G., 2018. "Which smart electricity service contracts will consumers accept? The demand for compensation in a platform market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 436-450.
    10. Swani, Kunal & Milne, George R. & Slepchuk, Alec N., 2021. "Revisiting Trust and Privacy Concern in Consumers' Perceptions of Marketing Information Management Practices: Replication and Extension," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 137-158.
    11. Leonie A. Venhoeven & Jan Willem Bolderdijk & Linda Steg, 2013. "Explaining the Paradox: How Pro-Environmental Behaviour can both Thwart and Foster Well-Being," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-15, March.
    12. Larissa Nicholls & Yolande Strengers & Jathan Sadowski, 2020. "Social impacts and control in the smart home," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 5(3), pages 180-182, March.
    13. Brown, Christopher J. & Markusson, Nils, 2019. "The responses of older adults to smart energy monitors," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 218-226.
    14. Jain, Shalini Sarin & Jain, Shailendra Pratap, 2018. "Power distance belief and preference for transparency," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 135-142.
    15. Khare, Apoorv & Jain, Rajesh, 2022. "Mapping the conceptual and intellectual structure of the consumer vulnerability field: A bibliometric analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 567-584.
    16. Alexander Buhmann & Johannes Paßmann & Christian Fieseler, 2020. "Managing Algorithmic Accountability: Balancing Reputational Concerns, Engagement Strategies, and the Potential of Rational Discourse," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 163(2), pages 265-280, May.
    17. Prigge, Jana-Kristin & Dietz, Beatrix & Homburg, Christian & Hoyer, Wayne D. & Burton, Jennifer L., 2015. "Patient empowerment: A cross-disease exploration of antecedents and consequences," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 375-386.
    18. Peter Seele & Mario D. Schultz, 2022. "From Greenwashing to Machinewashing: A Model and Future Directions Derived from Reasoning by Analogy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(4), pages 1063-1089, July.
    19. Gosnell, Greer & McCoy, Daire, 2023. "Market failures and willingness to accept smart meters: Experimental evidence from the UK," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    20. Whittle, Colin & Jones, Christopher R. & While, Aidan, 2020. "Empowering householders: Identifying predictors of intentions to use a home energy management system in the United Kingdom," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    21. Hans Jørn Juhl & Morten H. J. Fenger & John Thøgersen, 2017. "Will the Consistent Organic Food Consumer Step Forward? An Empirical Analysis," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(3), pages 519-535.
    22. Fuller, Christie M. & Simmering, Marcia J. & Atinc, Guclu & Atinc, Yasemin & Babin, Barry J., 2016. "Common methods variance detection in business research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 3192-3198.
    23. Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Kivimaa, Paula & Hielscher, Sabine & Jenkins, Kirsten, 2017. "Vulnerability and resistance in the United Kingdom's smart meter transition," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 767-781.
    24. Françoise Simon & Vesselina Tossan, 2018. "Does brand-consumer social sharing matter? A relational framework of customer engagement to brand-hosted social media," Post-Print hal-01867273, HAL.
    25. Michael G. Luchs & Minu Kumar, 2017. "“Yes, but this Other One Looks Better/Works Better”: How do Consumers Respond to Trade-offs Between Sustainability and Other Valued Attributes?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(3), pages 567-584, February.
    26. Gimpel, Henner & Graf, Vanessa & Graf-Drasch, Valerie, 2020. "A comprehensive model for individuals’ acceptance of smart energy technology – A meta-analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    27. Alderighi, Marco & Nava, Consuelo R. & Calabrese, Matteo & Christille, Jean-Marc & Salvemini, Chiara B., 2022. "Consumer perception of price fairness and dynamic pricing: Evidence from Booking.com," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 769-783.
    28. Alessandro Pitì & Giacomo Verticale & Cristina Rottondi & Antonio Capone & Luca Lo Schiavo, 2017. "The Role of Smart Meters in Enabling Real-Time Energy Services for Households: The Italian Case," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-25, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thunshirn, Philipp & Mlinaric, Ines & Berg, Jana, 2025. "A qualitative analysis of consumer motivations and barriers towards active smart meter utilization," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Milchram, Christine & Künneke, Rolf & Doorn, Neelke & van de Kaa, Geerten & Hillerbrand, Rafaela, 2020. "Designing for justice in electricity systems: A comparison of smart grid experiments in the Netherlands," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    2. Gordon, Joel A. & Balta-Ozkan, Nazmiye & Nabavi, Seyed Ali, 2023. "Socio-technical barriers to domestic hydrogen futures: Repurposing pipelines, policies, and public perceptions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    3. Corina Paraschiv & Nawel Ayadi, 2025. "Ethicality of online dynamic pricing: an empirical investigation of consumer perception of ethical risks," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(3), pages 285-299, June.
    4. Shirani, Fiona & Groves, Christopher & Henwood, Karen & Pidgeon, Nick & Roberts, Erin, 2020. "‘I'm the smart meter’: Perceptions of smart technology amongst vulnerable consumers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    5. Ion Popa & Marian Mihai Cioc & Stefan Catalin Pop & Daniel Botez & Marius-Ioan Pantea, 2023. "Aligning Public Policy with REPowerEU Program Objectives by Adopting EESS Solutions: A Technology Acceptance Model Approach," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 25(64), pages 660-660, August.
    6. Große-Kreul, Felix, 2022. "What will drive household adoption of smart energy? Insights from a consumer acceptance study in Germany," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    7. Pizzi, Gabriele & Vannucci, Virginia & Shukla, Yupal & Aiello, Gaetano, 2022. "Privacy concerns and justice perceptions with the disclosure of biometric versus behavioral data for personalized pricing tell me who you are, I’ll tell you how much you pay. Consumers’ fairness and p," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 420-432.
    8. Thunshirn, Philipp & Mlinaric, Ines & Berg, Jana, 2025. "A qualitative analysis of consumer motivations and barriers towards active smart meter utilization," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    9. Tajvidi, Mina & Richard, Marie-Odile & Wang, YiChuan & Hajli, Nick, 2020. "Brand co-creation through social commerce information sharing: The role of social media," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 476-486.
    10. Flecha-Ortíz, José & Santos-Corrada, María & Dones-González, Virgin & López-González, Evelyn & Vega, Alberto, 2021. "Millennials & Snapchat: Self-expression through its use and its influence on purchase motivation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 798-805.
    11. Nguyen, Phan Dinh & Tran, Lobel Trong Thuy & Baker, John, 2021. "Driving university brand value through social media," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    12. Lim, Weng Marc & Rasul, Tareq, 2022. "Customer engagement and social media: Revisiting the past to inform the future," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 325-342.
    13. Milchram, Christine & Hillerbrand, Rafaela & van de Kaa, Geerten & Doorn, Neelke & Künneke, Rolf, 2018. "Energy Justice and Smart Grid Systems: Evidence from the Netherlands and the United Kingdom," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 1244-1259.
    14. S. Ananda & Raghavendra Prasanna Kumar & Dharmendra Singh, 2023. "A mediation analysis of perceived service quality, customer satisfaction and customer engagement in the banking sector," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(3), pages 570-584, September.
    15. Moorlock, Emily & Dekel-Dachs, Ofer & Stokes, Peter & Larsen, Gretchen, 2023. "Constructing Consumer-Masstige brand relationships in a volatile social reality," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(PA).
    16. Anna Kowalska-Pyzalska & Katarzyna Byrka & Jakub Serek, 2020. "How to Foster the Adoption of Electricity Smart Meters? A Longitudinal Field Study of Residential Consumers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    17. Qi Gong & Jiahui Gu & Zhaoyang Kong & Siyan Shen & Xiucheng Dong & Yang Li & Chade Li, 2025. "The Impact of ESG Ratings on Corporate Sustainability: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-25, June.
    18. Vo Nga Thi & Chovancová Miloslava & Tri Ho Thanh, 2019. "A major boost to the website performance of up-scale hotels in Vietnam," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 14-30, March.
    19. April Yue, Cen, 2022. "The paradox of using public social media for work: The influence of after-hours work communication on employee outcomes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 748-759.
    20. Gosnell, Greer & McCoy, Daire, 2023. "Market failures and willingness to accept smart meters: Experimental evidence from the UK," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04185026. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.