IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v192y2024ics0301421524002684.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empowered or enchained? Exploring consumer perspectives on Direct Load Control

Author

Listed:
  • Nilsson, Anders
  • Bartusch, Cajsa

Abstract

Demand Response has become a central focus in policy discussions, attracting heightened attention for its potential key role in fostering enhanced demand flexibility. Direct Load Control (DLC) holds particular promise, requiring reduced consumer involvement compared to strategies relying on manual responses to time-varying pricing. However, the participation rate of residential consumers in DLC programs remains low, emphasizing the need for a more profound understanding of consumers' perspectives on DLC. Drawing from 15 in-depth interviews with Swedish households participating in a program involving direct load control of heat pumps, this study aims to explore the experiences and perceptions of consumers, providing in-depth understanding on factors that may serve as motivators, barriers and enablers for participation. Key findings include: financial benefits and interest in technology were the main motivations for participation; pre-existing knowledge and awareness of energy-related matters shaped consumers’ attitudes to DLC; trust in the service provider was a key enabling factor for participation. The study further suggests that DLC does not inevitably lead to a perceived loss of control among participants, but, if implemented in alignment with their specific conditions, needs and preferences, may also foster a sense of empowerment.

Suggested Citation

  • Nilsson, Anders & Bartusch, Cajsa, 2024. "Empowered or enchained? Exploring consumer perspectives on Direct Load Control," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:192:y:2024:i:c:s0301421524002684
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114248
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421524002684
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114248?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:192:y:2024:i:c:s0301421524002684. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.