IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v202y2025ics0301421525001156.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The winds of change? Attitudes toward wind projects and their electoral implications in Texas

Author

Listed:
  • Andrews, Talbot M.
  • Atkinson-Palombo, Carol
  • Bayulgen, Oksan
  • Gallaher, Adam
  • Scruggs, Lyle

Abstract

Wind power is increasingly cost-competitive, but there are growing concerns that partisan backlash will limit the rapid adoption of this low-carbon energy source. When evaluating wind projects, do voters consider the local costs and benefits of turbine construction? Or do their opinions reflect elite polarization on the issue? To answer these questions, we turn to the case of Texas: A state at the forefront of both wind project viability and elite polarization over the issue of wind power development. Surveying everyday Texans reveals that public opinion about wind power is driven primarily by considerations of local costs and benefits and is on average positive. These opinions affect vote choice: Turning to electoral outcomes from 2012 to 2022, turbine construction increased state legislative incumbent vote share. Despite increasing partisan differences on the topic of renewable energy, voters, on average, evaluate local costs and benefits and do not punish incumbent state legislators after local projects are constructed.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrews, Talbot M. & Atkinson-Palombo, Carol & Bayulgen, Oksan & Gallaher, Adam & Scruggs, Lyle, 2025. "The winds of change? Attitudes toward wind projects and their electoral implications in Texas," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:202:y:2025:i:c:s0301421525001156
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114608
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525001156
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114608?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:202:y:2025:i:c:s0301421525001156. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.