IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v283y2020i2p647-661.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Response transformation and profit decomposition for revenue uplift modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Gubela, Robin M.
  • Lessmann, Stefan
  • Jaroszewicz, Szymon

Abstract

Uplift models support decision-making in marketing campaign planning. Estimating the causal effect of a marketing treatment, an uplift model facilitates targeting marketing actions to responsive customers and efficient allocation of marketing budget. Research into uplift models focuses on conversion models to maximize incremental sales. The paper introduces uplift models for maximizing incremental revenues. If customers differ in their spending behavior, revenue maximization is a more plausible business objective compared to maximizing conversions. The proposed methodology entails a transformation of the prediction target, customer-level revenues, that facilitates implementing a causal uplift model using standard machine learning algorithms. The distribution of campaign revenues is typically zero-inflated because of many non-buyers. Remedies to this modeling challenge are incorporated in the proposed revenue uplift strategies in the form of two-stage models. Empirical experiments using real-world e-commerce data confirm the merits of the proposed revenue uplift strategy over relevant alternatives, including uplift models for conversion and recently developed causal machine learning algorithms. To quantify the degree to which improved targeting decisions raise return on marketing, the paper develops a decomposition of campaign profit. Applying the decomposition to a digital coupon targeting campaign, the paper provides evidence that revenue uplift modeling, as well as causal machine learning, can improve campaign profit substantially.

Suggested Citation

  • Gubela, Robin M. & Lessmann, Stefan & Jaroszewicz, Szymon, 2020. "Response transformation and profit decomposition for revenue uplift modeling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(2), pages 647-661.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:283:y:2020:i:2:p:647-661
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2019.11.030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221719309415
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.11.030?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Miruna Oprescu & Vasilis Syrgkanis & Zhiwei Steven Wu, 2018. "Orthogonal Random Forest for Causal Inference," Papers 1806.03467, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2019.
    2. Avi Goldfarb & Catherine Tucker, 2011. "Online Display Advertising: Targeting and Obtrusiveness," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(3), pages 389-404, 05-06.
    3. Robin Gubela & Artem Bequé & Stefan Lessmann & Fabian Gebert, 2019. "Conversion Uplift in E-Commerce: A Systematic Benchmark of Modeling Strategies," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(03), pages 747-791, May.
    4. Avi Goldfarb & Catherine Tucker, 2011. "Rejoinder--Implications of "Online Display Advertising: Targeting and Obtrusiveness"," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(3), pages 413-415, 05-06.
    5. Yao, Xiao & Crook, Jonathan & Andreeva, Galina, 2017. "Enhancing two-stage modelling methodology for loss given default with support vector machines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(2), pages 679-689.
    6. Imke Reimers & Claire (Chunying) Xie, 2019. "Do Coupons Expand or Cannibalize Revenue? Evidence from an e-Market," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(1), pages 286-300, January.
    7. Lu Tian & Ash A. Alizadeh & Andrew J. Gentles & Robert Tibshirani, 2014. "A Simple Method for Estimating Interactions Between a Treatment and a Large Number of Covariates," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 109(508), pages 1517-1532, December.
    8. Ballings, Michel & Van den Poel, Dirk, 2015. "CRM in social media: Predicting increases in Facebook usage frequency," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(1), pages 248-260.
    9. Atef Shaar & Talel Abdessalem & Olivier Segard, 2016. "Pessimistic uplift modeling," Post-Print hal-02376023, HAL.
    10. Magliozzi, T. L. & Berger, P. D., 1993. "List segmentation strategies in direct marketing," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 61-72, January.
    11. Lessmann, Stefan & Baesens, Bart & Seow, Hsin-Vonn & Thomas, Lyn C., 2015. "Benchmarking state-of-the-art classification algorithms for credit scoring: An update of research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 124-136.
    12. Stefan Lessmann & Kristof Coussement & Koen W. de Bock & Johannes Haupt, 2019. "Targeting customers for profit: An ensemble learning framework to support marketing decision-making," Post-Print hal-02275955, HAL.
    13. Matt Taddy & Matt Gardner & Liyun Chen & David Draper, 2016. "A Nonparametric Bayesian Analysis of Heterogenous Treatment Effects in Digital Experimentation," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(4), pages 661-672, October.
    14. Baesens, Bart & Viaene, Stijn & Van den Poel, Dirk & Vanthienen, Jan & Dedene, Guido, 2002. "Bayesian neural network learning for repeat purchase modelling in direct marketing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(1), pages 191-211, April.
    15. Imbens,Guido W. & Rubin,Donald B., 2015. "Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521885881, September.
    16. Verbeke, Wouter & Dejaeger, Karel & Martens, David & Hur, Joon & Baesens, Bart, 2012. "New insights into churn prediction in the telecommunication sector: A profit driven data mining approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(1), pages 211-229.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniel Baier & Björn Stöcker, 2022. "Profit uplift modeling for direct marketing campaigns: approaches and applications for online shops," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 92(4), pages 645-673, May.
    2. Bokelmann, Björn & Lessmann, Stefan, 2025. "Heteroscedasticity-aware stratified sampling to improve uplift modeling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 325(1), pages 118-131.
    3. Daniel Guhl & Friederike Paetz & Udo Wagner & Michel Wedel, 2024. "Predicting and optimizing marketing performance in dynamic markets," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 46(1), pages 1-27, March.
    4. Goic, Marcel & Rojas, Andrea & Saavedra, Ignacio, 2021. "The Effectiveness of Triggered Email Marketing in Addressing Browse Abandonments," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 118-145.
    5. Bokelmann, Björn & Lessmann, Stefan, 2024. "Improving uplift model evaluation on randomized controlled trial data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 313(2), pages 691-707.
    6. Robin M. Gubela & Stefan Lessmann & Björn Stöcker, 2024. "Multiple Treatment Modeling for Target Marketing Campaigns: A Large-Scale Benchmark Study," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 875-898, June.
    7. Arno de Caigny & Kristof Coussement & Wouter Verbeke & Khaoula Idbenjra & Minh Phan, 2021. "Uplift modeling and its implications for B2B customer churn prediction: A segmentation-based modeling approach," Post-Print hal-03599615, HAL.
    8. Vairetti, Carla & Gennaro, Franco & Maldonado, Sebastián, 2024. "Propensity score oversampling and matching for uplift modeling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 316(3), pages 1058-1069.
    9. Tobias Cagala & Ulrich Glogowsky & Johannes Rincke & Anthony Strittmatter, 2021. "Optimal Targeting in Fundraising: A Machine-Learning Approach," Economics working papers 2021-08, Department of Economics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria.
    10. Haupt, Johannes & Lessmann, Stefan, 2022. "Targeting customers under response-dependent costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(1), pages 369-379.
    11. Zhen-Yu Chen & Zhi-Ping Fan & Minghe Sun, 2023. "Machine Learning Methods for Data-Driven Demand Estimation and Assortment Planning Considering Cross-Selling and Substitutions," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 158-177, January.
    12. Tobias Cagala & Ulrich Glogowsky & Johannes Rincke & Anthony Strittmatter, 2021. "Optimal Targeting in Fundraising: A Causal Machine-Learning Approach," Papers 2103.10251, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2021.
    13. Johannes Haupt & Stefan Lessmann, 2020. "Targeting customers under response-dependent costs," Papers 2003.06271, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2021.
    14. Gabriel Okasa, 2022. "Meta-Learners for Estimation of Causal Effects: Finite Sample Cross-Fit Performance," Papers 2201.12692, arXiv.org.
    15. Yertai Tanai & Kamil Ciftci, 2025. "How to customize an early start preparatory course policy to improve student graduation success: an application of uplift modeling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 347(2), pages 913-936, April.
    16. Verbeke, Wouter & Olaya, Diego & Guerry, Marie-Anne & Van Belle, Jente, 2023. "To do or not to do? Cost-sensitive causal classification with individual treatment effect estimates," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(2), pages 838-852.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lechner, Michael, 2018. "Modified Causal Forests for Estimating Heterogeneous Causal Effects," IZA Discussion Papers 12040, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Michael C Knaus & Michael Lechner & Anthony Strittmatter, 2021. "Machine learning estimation of heterogeneous causal effects: Empirical Monte Carlo evidence," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 24(1), pages 134-161.
    3. Matthias Bogaert & Lex Delaere, 2023. "Ensemble Methods in Customer Churn Prediction: A Comparative Analysis of the State-of-the-Art," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-28, February.
    4. Min Tian & Paul R. Hoban & Neeraj Arora, 2024. "What Cookie-Based Advertising Effectiveness Fails to Measure," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(2), pages 407-418, March.
    5. Lessmann, Stefan & Coussement, Kristof & De Bock, Koen W. & Haupt, Johannes, 2018. "Targeting customers for profit: An ensemble learning framework to support marketing decision making," IRTG 1792 Discussion Papers 2018-012, Humboldt University of Berlin, International Research Training Group 1792 "High Dimensional Nonstationary Time Series".
    6. Weijia Dai & Hyunjin Kim & Michael Luca, 2023. "Frontiers: Which Firms Gain from Digital Advertising? Evidence from a Field Experiment," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(3), pages 429-439, May.
    7. Brett R. Gordon & Florian Zettelmeyer & Neha Bhargava & Dan Chapsky, 2019. "A Comparison of Approaches to Advertising Measurement: Evidence from Big Field Experiments at Facebook," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(2), pages 193-225, March.
    8. Kim, Su Jung & Wang, Rebecca Jen-Hui & Malthouse, Edward C., 2015. "The Effects of Adopting and Using a Brand's Mobile Application on Customers' Subsequent Purchase Behavior," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 28-41.
    9. Robin Gubela & Artem Bequé & Stefan Lessmann & Fabian Gebert, 2019. "Conversion Uplift in E-Commerce: A Systematic Benchmark of Modeling Strategies," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(03), pages 747-791, May.
    10. Gubela, Robin & Bequé, Artem & Gebert, Fabian & Lessmann, Stefan, 2018. "Conversion uplift in e-commerce: A systematic benchmark of modeling strategies," IRTG 1792 Discussion Papers 2018-062, Humboldt University of Berlin, International Research Training Group 1792 "High Dimensional Nonstationary Time Series".
    11. Haupt, Johannes & Lessmann, Stefan, 2022. "Targeting customers under response-dependent costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(1), pages 369-379.
    12. Jinping Hu, 2023. "Customer feature selection from high-dimensional bank direct marketing data for uplift modeling," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(2), pages 160-171, June.
    13. Vilma Todri, 2022. "Frontiers: The Impact of Ad-Blockers on Online Consumer Behavior," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(1), pages 7-18, January.
    14. Weijia Dai & Hyunjin Kim & Michael Luca, 2016. "Which Firms Gain from Digital Advertising? Evidence from a Field Experiment," Harvard Business School Working Papers 17-025, Harvard Business School, revised Jan 2023.
    15. Gabriel Okasa, 2022. "Meta-Learners for Estimation of Causal Effects: Finite Sample Cross-Fit Performance," Papers 2201.12692, arXiv.org.
    16. Shun-Yang Lee & Julian Runge & Daniel Yoo & Yakov Bart & Anett Gyurak & J. W. Schneider, 2023. "COVID-19 Demand Shocks Revisited: Did Advertising Technology Help Mitigate Adverse Consequences for Small and Midsize Businesses?," Papers 2307.09035, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2024.
    17. Potoglou, Dimitris & Palacios, Juan & Feijoo, Claudio & Gómez Barroso, Jose-Luis, 2015. "The supply of personal information: A study on the determinants of information provision in e-commerce scenarios," 26th European Regional ITS Conference, Madrid 2015 127174, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    18. Chou, Ping & Chuang, Howard Hao-Chun & Chou, Yen-Chun & Liang, Ting-Peng, 2022. "Predictive analytics for customer repurchase: Interdisciplinary integration of buy till you die modeling and machine learning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(2), pages 635-651.
    19. Yanwen Wang & Chunhua Wu & Ting Zhu, 2019. "Mobile Hailing Technology and Taxi Driving Behaviors," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(5), pages 734-755, September.
    20. Davide Viviano & Jelena Bradic, 2019. "Synthetic learner: model-free inference on treatments over time," Papers 1904.01490, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2022.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:283:y:2020:i:2:p:647-661. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.