IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v325y2025i1p118-131.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Heteroscedasticity-aware stratified sampling to improve uplift modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Bokelmann, Björn
  • Lessmann, Stefan

Abstract

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are conducted in many business applications including online marketing or customer churn prevention to investigate the effect of specific treatments (coupons, retention offers, mailings, etc.). RCTs allow for the estimation of average treatment effects and the training of (uplift) models for the heterogeneity of treatment effects across individuals. The problem with RCTs is that they are costly, and this cost increases with the number of individuals included. These costs have inspired research on how to conduct experiments with a small number of individuals while still obtaining precise treatment effect estimates. We contribute to this literature a heteroskedasticity-aware stratified sampling (HS) scheme. We leverage the fact that different individuals have different noise levels in their outcome and that precise treatment effect estimation requires more observations from the “high-noise” individuals than from the “low-noise” individuals. We show theoretically and empirically that HS sampling yields significantly more precise estimates of the ATE, improves uplift models, and makes their evaluation more reliable compared to RCT data sampled completely randomly. Due to these benefits and the simplicity of our approach, we expect HS sampling to be valuable in many real-world applications in business and beyond.

Suggested Citation

  • Bokelmann, Björn & Lessmann, Stefan, 2025. "Heteroscedasticity-aware stratified sampling to improve uplift modeling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 325(1), pages 118-131.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:325:y:2025:i:1:p:118-131
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2025.02.030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221725001535
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2025.02.030?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:325:y:2025:i:1:p:118-131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.