IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecanpo/v87y2025icp2330-2345.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ESG global trends: A comparative analysis of China and the international community

Author

Listed:
  • Qi, Meng
  • Fang, Wenjing

Abstract

The global community is increasingly prioritizing environmental sustainability, with numerous enterprises adopting ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) strategies to align their operations with green development. However, the current global research on ESG remains fragmented, marked by disparities and growing tensions among nations. This study conducts a bibliometric analysis of 4,047 publicly available articles from the Web of Science (WoS) published between 2012 and 2024, utilizing SPSS, CiteSpace, and VOSviewer. Additionally, it incorporates a comparative analysis of 935 articles from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). The findings reveal that China and the United States lead significantly in research output, yet their respective stages of ESG research differ markedly. The study also highlights a lack of interdisciplinary linkages in ESG research, with notable homogenization observed within the field. In China, the evolution of ESG-related knowledge has diversified over time, shifting from initial focus areas like investment to broader themes such as fiduciary duty and information disclosure. Given the existing research gaps and insufficient exploration of certain aspects, future studies should put forward practical response strategies to strengthen ESG regulation, and explore more comprehensive assessment methods to improve ESG capabilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Qi, Meng & Fang, Wenjing, 2025. "ESG global trends: A comparative analysis of China and the international community," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 2330-2345.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:87:y:2025:i:c:p:2330-2345
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2025.08.021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592625003418
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eap.2025.08.021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:87:y:2025:i:c:p:2330-2345. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.