IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i6p2413-d1608893.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does ESG Information Disclosure Improve Green Innovation in Manufacturing Enterprises?

Author

Listed:
  • Danni Wang

    (College of Economics and Finance, Huaqiao University, Quanzhou 362021, China)

  • Tingwei Wang

    (College of Economics and Finance, Huaqiao University, Quanzhou 362021, China)

Abstract

Based on the data of Chinese A-share manufacturing firms from 2015 to 2021, this paper employs the multiple regression method to explore the relationship between ESG information disclosure and corporate green innovation, while also examining the impact of local government environmental attention on this relationship. The results indicate that: (1) ESG information disclosure significantly promotes corporate green innovation, particularly in the eastern and central regions of China, as well as areas with a strong Confucian cultural background; (2) Alleviating financing constraints and reducing agency costs are important channels through which ESG information disclosure influences corporate green innovation; and (3) Local government environmental attention exhibits an “inverted U-shaped” regulating effect on the relationship between ESG disclosure and corporate green innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Danni Wang & Tingwei Wang, 2025. "Does ESG Information Disclosure Improve Green Innovation in Manufacturing Enterprises?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-17, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:6:p:2413-:d:1608893
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2413/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2413/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luo, Yuanda & Xiong, Guobao & Mardani, Abbas, 2022. "Environmental information disclosure and corporate innovation: The “Inverted U-shaped” regulating effect of media attention," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 453-463.
    2. Han Long & Gen-Fu Feng & Chun-Ping Chang, 2023. "How does ESG performance promote corporate green innovation?," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 2889-2913, August.
    3. Rubashkina, Yana & Galeotti, Marzio & Verdolini, Elena, 2015. "Environmental regulation and competitiveness: Empirical evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from European manufacturing sectors," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 288-300.
    4. Hua Tang, 2022. "The Effect of ESG Performance on Corporate Innovation in China: The Mediating Role of Financial Constraints and Agency Cost," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, March.
    5. Richard F. J. Haans & Constant Pieters & Zi-Lin He, 2016. "Thinking about U: Theorizing and testing U- and inverted U-shaped relationships in strategy research," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(7), pages 1177-1195, July.
    6. Annalisa Ferrando & Maria†Teresa Marchica & Roberto Mura, 2017. "Financial Flexibility and Investment Ability Across the Euro Area and the UK," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 23(1), pages 87-126, January.
    7. Emma Avetisyan & Kai Hockerts, 2017. "The Consolidation of the ESG Rating Industry as an Enactment of Institutional Retrogression," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 316-330, March.
    8. Gao, Xiang & He, Xixi & Sun, Chuanwang & Wu, Dongmei & Zhang, Jie, 2025. "Innovation in shouldering green responsibility: ESG performance and green technology innovation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    9. Miao Li & Rajah Rasiah, 2024. "Can ESG Disclosure Stimulate Corporations’ Sustainable Green Innovation Efforts? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-20, October.
    10. Xiaoshu Xu & Jiangpei Pan & Xuechen Meng, 2024. "Intelligent Manufacturing and Green Innovation—Evidence from China’s Listed Manufacturing Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-15, November.
    11. Lei Xi & Ziyi Guo, 2024. "The Impact of Top Management Team Heterogeneity on Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance and Corporate Green Innovation: Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-21, December.
    12. Yu-Shan Chen, 2008. "The Driver of Green Innovation and Green Image – Green Core Competence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 81(3), pages 531-543, September.
    13. Heying Liu & Chan Lyu, 2022. "Can ESG Ratings Stimulate Corporate Green Innovation? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, September.
    14. Emma Avetisyan & Kai Hockerts, 2017. "Consolidation of the ESG Rating Industry as an Enactment of Institutional Retrogression," Post-Print hal-01695693, HAL.
    15. Haoqiang Yuan & Haiyan Luan & Xi Wang, 2024. "The Impact of ESG Rating Events on Corporate Green Technology Innovation under Sustainable Development: Perspectives Based on Informal Environmental Regulation of Social Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-26, September.
    16. Rodolphe Durand & Robert M. Grant & Tammy L. Madsen & Sinziana Dorobantu & Aseem Kaul & Bennet Zelner, 2017. "Nonmarket strategy research through the lens of new institutional economics: An integrative review and future directions," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 114-140, January.
    17. Qingqing Zhao & Xintao Li & Siqi Li, 2023. "Analyzing the Relationship between Digital Transformation Strategy and ESG Performance in Large Manufacturing Enterprises: The Mediating Role of Green Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, June.
    18. Tao Zhu & Dongjiao Liu & Lequan Zhang, 2025. "Does ESG Performance Help Corporate Deleveraging? Based on an Analysis of Excessive Corporate Debt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-22, February.
    19. Cropper, Maureen L & Oates, Wallace E, 1992. "Environmental Economics: A Survey," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 30(2), pages 675-740, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tan, Xiujie & Liu, Gufeng & Cheng, Si, 2024. "How does ESG performance affect green transformation of resource-based enterprises: Evidence from Chinese listed enterprises," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    2. Guo, Shu & Zhang, ZhongXiang, 2023. "Green credit policy and total factor productivity: Evidence from Chinese listed companies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    3. Heying Liu & Chan Lyu, 2022. "Can ESG Ratings Stimulate Corporate Green Innovation? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, September.
    4. Ajithakumari Vijayappan Nair Biju & Snehith Jacob Kodiyatt & P. P. Nithi Krishna & Geetha Sreelekshmi, 2023. "ESG sentiments and divergent ESG scores: suggesting a framework for ESG rating," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(12), pages 1-21, December.
    5. Hasmik V. Khachatryan, 2022. "Divergence of ESG Ratings: Foreign Regulatory Trends," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 5, pages 89-104, October.
    6. Cai, Cen & Li, Yijia & Tu, Yongqian, 2024. "Big data capabilities, ESG performance and corporate value," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA).
    7. Ursule Yvanna Otek Ntsama & Chen Yan & Alireza Nasiri & Abdel Hamid Mbouombouo Mboungam, 2021. "Green bonds issuance: insights in low- and middle-income countries," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-9, December.
    8. Paolo Capelli & Federica Ielasi & Angeloantonio Russo, 2021. "Forecasting volatility by integrating financial risk with environmental, social, and governance risk," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5), pages 1483-1495, September.
    9. Qi, Guoyou & Zou, Hailiang & Xie, Xuemei & Meng, Xiaohua & Fan, Tijun & Cao, Yuanhe, 2020. "Obedience or escape: Examining the contingency influences of corruption on firm exports," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 261-272.
    10. Khan, Muhammad Arif, 2022. "ESG disclosure and Firm performance: A bibliometric and meta analysis," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    11. Press, Melea & Brzeszczyński, Janusz, 2022. "Do business models matter?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    12. Ellen Pei‐yi Yu & Christine Qian Guo & Bac Van Luu, 2018. "Environmental, social and governance transparency and firm value," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(7), pages 987-1004, November.
    13. Raphaela Helbig & Sven von Höveling & Andreas Solsbach & Jorge Marx Gómez, 2021. "Strategic analysis of providing corporate sustainability open data," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(3), pages 195-214, July.
    14. Sharma, Gagan Deep & Tiwari, Aviral Kumar & Talan, Gaurav & Jain, Mansi, 2021. "Revisiting the sustainable versus conventional investment dilemma in COVID-19 times," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    15. Gallucci, Carmen & Santulli, Rosalia & Lagasio, Valentina, 2022. "The conceptualization of environmental, social and governance risks in portfolio studies A systematic literature review," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    16. Zahra Adardour & Slimane Ed-Dafali & Muhammad Mohiuddin & Omar El Mortagi & Hicham Sbai & Brahim Bouzahir, 2025. "Exploring the drivers of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure in an emerging market context using a mixed methods approach," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-23, December.
    17. Ester Clementino & Richard Perkins, 2021. "How Do Companies Respond to Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) ratings? Evidence from Italy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 171(2), pages 379-397, June.
    18. Rodrigo Zeidan, 2022. "Why don't asset managers accelerate ESG investing? A sentiment analysis based on 13,000 messages from finance professionals," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3028-3039, November.
    19. Vincenzo Pacelli & Francesca Pampurini & Anna Grazia Quaranta, 2023. "Environmental, Social and Governance investing: Does rating matter?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 30-41, January.
    20. Zhou, Kuo & Luo, Haotian & Qu, Zhi, 2023. "What can the environmental rule of law do for environmental innovation? Evidence from environmental tribunals in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:6:p:2413-:d:1608893. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.