IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/riibaf/v78y2025ics0275531925002879.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How do firms react to ESG news-based sentiment? A corporate risk-taking perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Zhuang, Pengtao
  • He, Qing
  • Ju, Wangjing
  • Xia, Qin

Abstract

This study investigates how firms respond to ESG news-based sentiment from the perspective of corporate risk-taking. Our findings reveal a significant negative relationship between ESG news sentiment and corporate risk-taking. Mechanism analyses reveal two primary transmission channels—reputational pressure and information obfuscation—through which heightened sentiment intensifies managerial risk aversion. Among the three ESG dimensions, governance-related sentiment has the strongest dampening effect on risk-taking. Heterogeneity analyses show that this negative impact is more pronounced in firms with lower third-party ESG ratings, weaker managerial ownership, and limited analyst coverage. These findings highlight the role of both external ESG information intermediaries and strong internal governance in moderating the influence of ESG news sentiment. However, the dampening effect of ESG news sentiment on risk-taking poses significant challenges to the long-term growth of corporate value.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhuang, Pengtao & He, Qing & Ju, Wangjing & Xia, Qin, 2025. "How do firms react to ESG news-based sentiment? A corporate risk-taking perspective," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:78:y:2025:i:c:s0275531925002879
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.103031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531925002879
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.103031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:78:y:2025:i:c:s0275531925002879. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ribaf .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.