IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/glofin/v66y2025ics104402832500050x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ESG rating disagreement and the cost of equity capital

Author

Listed:
  • Lou, Zhukun
  • Li, Sujie
  • Tong, Jingyi
  • Zhao, Jing

Abstract

The growing controversy surrounding corporate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings is increasingly drawing the attention of investors and becoming a focal point in academic research. This paper advances two competing hypotheses concerning the impact of ESG rating disagreement on the cost of equity capital: the confidence channel hypothesis and the information channel hypothesis. Utilizing data from Chinese A-share listed companies on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges from 2015 to 2023 as our research sample, this study empirically investigates the effect of ESG rating disagreement on the cost of equity capital and its underlying mechanisms. The findings reveal that ESG rating disagreement increases firms' cost of equity capital, a relationship confirmed through extensive robustness tests. Mechanism analysis indicates that ESG rating disagreement elevates the cost of equity capital by undermining investor confidence (the confidence channel), while there is no evidence to support the notion that it reduces the cost of equity capital by decreasing information asymmetry (the information channel). Further analysis demonstrates that in heavily polluting industries, the adverse impact of ESG rating disagreement on the cost of equity capital is more pronounced. However, institutional investors' site visits and analyst coverage can alleviate the negative effects of ESG rating disagreement on the cost of equity capital.

Suggested Citation

  • Lou, Zhukun & Li, Sujie & Tong, Jingyi & Zhao, Jing, 2025. "ESG rating disagreement and the cost of equity capital," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:glofin:v:66:y:2025:i:c:s104402832500050x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.gfj.2025.101123
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S104402832500050X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.gfj.2025.101123?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:glofin:v:66:y:2025:i:c:s104402832500050x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620162 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.