IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v172y2025ics019074092500129x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

University students’ perceptions of spanking as a child discipline strategy

Author

Listed:
  • Love, Darius O.
  • Saljic, Irma
  • Kuthe, Amruta
  • McGoron, Lucy

Abstract

Corporal punishment is a child discipline method in which a caregiver deliberately inflicts pain upon a child in response to child’s behavior. The immediate aim of corporal punishment is usually to alter children’s behavior. Multiple groups focused on promoting children’s health and well-being (e.g., The American Academy of Pediatrics) urge parents to use alternative discipline practices instead of spanking. Despite such recommendations, research suggests that spanking remains a common disciplinary practice—although some research does suggest that the prevalence has decreased across generations. There is still a need to understand the prevalence of spanking and the factors that impact attitudes toward spanking. This investigation examined rates of being spanked as a child and perceptions of using spanking as a disciplinary practice in 271 students recruited at a university with a diverse student body. The impact of multiple sociocultural factors and the relation between the history of being spanked as a child and current perceptions of spanking were examined. Results showed that approximately 70% of students reported being spanked as a child with some differences emerging from being an immigrant or first generation American and reported race. Additionally, students who reported being spanked had statistically significant higher rates of positive views towards using spanking as a disciplinary practice. Results are discussed within the context of public health campaigns aimed at reducing spanking rates.

Suggested Citation

  • Love, Darius O. & Saljic, Irma & Kuthe, Amruta & McGoron, Lucy, 2025. "University students’ perceptions of spanking as a child discipline strategy," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:172:y:2025:i:c:s019074092500129x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108246
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019074092500129X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108246?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gianmarco I. P. Ottaviano & Giovanni Peri & Greg C. Wright, 2021. "Immigration, Offshoring, and American Jobs," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Firms and Workers in a Globalized World Larger Markets, Tougher Competition, chapter 10, pages 291-326, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    2. ., 2021. "ETS design in practice: North America," Chapters, in: Carbon Markets Around the Globe, chapter 4, pages 59-76, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Feely, Megan & Seay, Kristen D. & Loomis, Alysse M., 2019. "Harsh physical punishment as a mediator between income, re-reports and out-of-home placement in a child protective services-involved population," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 70-78.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schneemann, Christian & Maier, Tobias & Mönnig, Anke & Linhard, Theresa & Weber, Enzo & Zika, Gerd, 2021. "Langfristprojektionen im QuBe-Projekt: US-Konjunkturprogramme beflügeln auch Wirtschaft und Arbeitsmarkt in Deutschland (Long-term projections in the QuBe project: US economic stimulus programs are al," IAB-Kurzbericht 202123, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    2. Tahlyan, Divyakant & Said, Maher & Mahmassani, Hani & Stathopoulos, Amanda & Walker, Joan & Shaheen, Susan, 2022. "For whom did telework not work during the Pandemic? understanding the factors impacting telework satisfaction in the US using a multiple indicator multiple cause (MIMIC) model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 387-402.
    3. Lorenzo Caliendo & Luca David Opromolla & Fernando Parro & Alessandro Sforza, 2021. "Goods and Factor Market Integration: A Quantitative Assessment of the EU Enlargement," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 129(12), pages 3491-3545.
    4. Osea Giuntella & Fabrizio Mazzonna & Catia Nicodemo & Carlos Vargas-Silva, 2019. "Immigration and the reallocation of work health risks," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 32(3), pages 1009-1042, July.
    5. Colantone, Italo & Crinò, Rosario, 2014. "New imported inputs, new domestic products," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(1), pages 147-165.
    6. Cantarella, Michele & Strozzi, Chiara, 2019. "Workers in the Crowd: The Labour Market Impact of the Online Platform Economy," IZA Discussion Papers 12327, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    7. Eckel, Carsten & Irlacher, Michael, 2017. "Multi-product offshoring," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 71-89.
    8. Andrei Zlate & Federico Mandelman, 2013. "Offshoring, Low-skilled Immigration and Labor Market Polarization," 2013 Meeting Papers 1073, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    9. David Hummels & Jakob R. Munch & Chong Xiang, 2018. "Offshoring and Labor Markets," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 56(3), pages 981-1028, September.
    10. Elena Kulchina, 2016. "A path to value creation for foreign entrepreneurs," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(7), pages 1240-1262, July.
    11. Ejaz Ghani & William R. Kerr & Christopher Stanton, 2014. "Diasporas and Outsourcing: Evidence from oDesk and India," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(7), pages 1677-1697, July.
    12. Sanchis-Guarner, Rosa, 2023. "Decomposing the impact of immigration on house prices," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    13. Jiang, Zhe (Jasmine), 2024. "Offshoring, firm-level adjustment and labor market outcomes," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    14. Guy Michaels & Ferdinand Rauch & Stephen J Redding, 2019. "Task Specialization in U.S. Cities from 1880 to 2000," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 17(3), pages 754-798.
    15. Mitaritonna, Cristina & Orefice, Gianluca & Peri, Giovanni, 2017. "Immigrants and firms’ outcomes: Evidence from France," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 62-82.
    16. Olubukola Oduntan & Ian Ruthven, 2021. "People and places: Bridging the information gaps in refugee integration," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(1), pages 83-96, January.
    17. Tomasz Serwach, 2022. "The European Union and within-country income inequalities. The case of the New Member States," Working Papers hal-03548416, HAL.
    18. Ottaviano, Gianmarco I.P. & Peri, Giovanni & Wright, Greg C., 2018. "Immigration, trade and productivity in services: Evidence from U.K. firms," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 88-108.
    19. Galbis, Eva Moreno, 2020. "Differences in work conditions between natives and immigrants: preferences vs. outside employment opportunities," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    20. Nikolaj Malchow-Møller & Jakob Roland Munch & Claus Aastrup Seidelin & Jan Rose Skaksen, 2013. "Immigrant Workers and Farm Performance: Evidence from Matched Employer-Employee Data," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 95(4), pages 819-841.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:172:y:2025:i:c:s019074092500129x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.