IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v172y2025ics019074092500129x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

University students’ perceptions of spanking as a child discipline strategy

Author

Listed:
  • Love, Darius O.
  • Saljic, Irma
  • Kuthe, Amruta
  • McGoron, Lucy

Abstract

Corporal punishment is a child discipline method in which a caregiver deliberately inflicts pain upon a child in response to child’s behavior. The immediate aim of corporal punishment is usually to alter children’s behavior. Multiple groups focused on promoting children’s health and well-being (e.g., The American Academy of Pediatrics) urge parents to use alternative discipline practices instead of spanking. Despite such recommendations, research suggests that spanking remains a common disciplinary practice—although some research does suggest that the prevalence has decreased across generations. There is still a need to understand the prevalence of spanking and the factors that impact attitudes toward spanking. This investigation examined rates of being spanked as a child and perceptions of using spanking as a disciplinary practice in 271 students recruited at a university with a diverse student body. The impact of multiple sociocultural factors and the relation between the history of being spanked as a child and current perceptions of spanking were examined. Results showed that approximately 70% of students reported being spanked as a child with some differences emerging from being an immigrant or first generation American and reported race. Additionally, students who reported being spanked had statistically significant higher rates of positive views towards using spanking as a disciplinary practice. Results are discussed within the context of public health campaigns aimed at reducing spanking rates.

Suggested Citation

  • Love, Darius O. & Saljic, Irma & Kuthe, Amruta & McGoron, Lucy, 2025. "University students’ perceptions of spanking as a child discipline strategy," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:172:y:2025:i:c:s019074092500129x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108246
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019074092500129X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108246?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:172:y:2025:i:c:s019074092500129x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.